Antisemitism in Leeds
A Woman of SubstanceAntisemitism in Leeds is depicted not as a single act of hostility but as a climate of prejudice that exposes Jewish residents to harassment and violence while leaving them to rely largely on their own precautions. Emma Harte first encounters it when she intervenes as boys stone Abraham Kallinski. His explanation of the danger, and her subsequent welcome at his family’s Friday-evening meal, give her a direct view of both persecution and the community it targets. The experience shapes her lasting readiness to defend her Jewish friends.
Street hostility and limited protection
The immediate incident is stark: boys throw stones at Abraham because he is Jewish. Emma, who does not initially understand what that means, asks why his identity should make him a target. Abraham explains the prejudice as fear of people perceived as unfamiliar or different, hardened into hatred without a reasonable basis. His account widens the scene beyond the boys in the street: Jewish residents may face insults, assaults, broken windows, attacks on their homes, and other acts of cruelty when hostile crowds grow violent.
The threat is compounded by the weakness of public protection. Asked whether the police can stop such attacks, Abraham describes their response as inconsistent and often indifferent. At times officers intervene; often, he says, they turn a blind eye. Jewish residents consequently protect themselves by keeping to themselves, going quietly about their business, and avoiding confrontations that might become dangerous. The account presents prejudice as more than private animosity: it shapes how a community moves through the city and how much safety its members can expect from the authorities.
Migration and the meaning of persecution
Abraham places Leeds’s Jewish community within a wider history of migration. He comes from Kiev, then in Russia, and says that many Jewish immigrants in Leeds came from Russia or Poland. They had come to escape pogroms and harassment. Although hostility persists in England, he regards it as less severe than what he experienced in Russia and values the freedom he has found there. His comparison gives the danger in Leeds a particular measure: relative safety does not mean an absence of discrimination.
The conversation also reveals the distance between Emma’s experience and Abraham’s. She comes from Ripon and admits she had not known that many Jewish immigrants lived in Leeds or that they were widely despised. Abraham patiently explains that Jewish customs, dietary rules, and worship differ from those of the surrounding Christian population, while also emphasizing the common ground between them. Emma responds by recognizing how ignorance and social division can foster cruelty. His account prompts her to connect religious prejudice with the class divisions she knows in England, without treating the two forms of injustice as identical.
The Kallinski household as counterpoint
Emma’s understanding deepens when she is welcomed into the Kallinski home for the Friday-evening meal. Janessa Kallinski sets a place for her, and Emma observes the family’s observances: the lighting and blessing of candles, prayers, a blessing over wine, and the breaking of bread before the meal. David Kallinski explains that his father has recited the Kiddush. The customs are unfamiliar to Emma, but the family makes space for her to watch, learn, and eat with them.
The scene counters the assumptions behind the hostility Abraham has described. At the table, Emma perceives affection, hospitality, and ease among Abraham, Janessa, David, and Victor. The bread passed around has a specific history in this encounter: it is the loaf Emma rescued from the street. What had been caught up in an act of public hostility becomes part of a shared meal. The contrast does not erase the danger outside the home; instead, it shows the humanity and ordinary family life that prejudice refuses to see.
Emma’s lasting response
Abraham’s explanation also leads Emma to examine her own hatred of Edwin Fairley, who betrayed her. She distinguishes her anger at a particular injury from the indiscriminate hostility Abraham describes. That moment makes the encounter more than an introduction to an unfamiliar community: it tests how Emma understands the grounds and consequences of hatred. She remains convinced that her grievance is not the same as prejudice directed at people simply for being different, but she has been made to consider the moral distinction carefully.
The Friday meal becomes a lasting point of reference for Emma. The narrative states that she continues throughout her life to defend her Jewish friends and to feel shock and grief at the racism directed against them in Leeds. Her response grows from a concrete encounter: she first sees Abraham being targeted, then listens to him explain the risks faced by his community, and finally experiences the welcome of the household that the surrounding prejudice stigmatizes. Antisemitism is therefore shown through both its public consequences and the intimacy it threatens, while Emma’s changed understanding gives the episode a continuing place in her moral outlook.