Readify

PLUA

Another Day of Life

PLUA, the Party of the Struggle of the Africans of Angola, was founded in 1953 as the first liberation organization in Angola. Its importance in the book’s account lies both in that early step toward organized resistance and in its place among the groups that came together to form the MPLA in Luanda in 1956.

Identity and Early Context

The book places PLUA’s creation within a wider emergence of Angolan cultural and political activity. In 1948, a group of young Angolan intellectuals established the cultural movement Vamos descobrir Angola. The movement published two issues of the literary periodical The Message before the police closed it. Its editor and leader, Viriato da Cruz, worked closely with the poets Agostinho Neto and Mário de Andrade; the account identifies these three figures with the rise of the Angolan liberation movement.

This earlier cultural activity provides context for PLUA’s appearance five years later, but the account does not describe a direct organizational link between the movement and the party. It presents them instead as successive developments in a growing liberation struggle: first a cultural initiative led by intellectuals, then an organization dedicated to political liberation.

Founding and Clandestine Operation

PLUA was created in 1953 as the first liberation organization in Angola. The account gives its full name as the Party of the Struggle of the Africans of Angola and emphasizes the conditions in which it operated: like the subsequent liberation organizations in Angola, it came into being and worked clandestinely. It provides no further detail about the party’s internal structure, membership, or specific operations, so its early significance is established chiefly through its pioneering status and covert conditions.

Relation to the MPLA

On 10 December 1956, PLUA united with other small liberation groups, and the MPLA arose from that union in Luanda. The newly formed movement was led by the thirty-four-year-old doctor and poet Agostinho Neto. The book thus identifies PLUA as part of the organizational foundation from which the MPLA emerged, while describing the transition as a union of several groups rather than attributing the MPLA’s creation to PLUA alone.

The chronology makes PLUA an early link between the first organized liberation efforts and the later movement that became central to the struggle. The evidence does not trace PLUA as a separate organization after the 1956 union, or specify how its personnel and structures were incorporated; its documented trajectory runs from clandestine founding to participation in the formation of the MPLA.