Normality and bodily difference
Black Water (Joyce Carol Oates Edition)Normality and bodily difference is a recurring concept in Kelly Kelleher’s story, where the wish to appear normal reaches from childhood eye surgery to adult efforts to manage her skin, weight, and public self. The novel makes bodily difference concrete, but also shows that its meaning is shaped by the gaze of parents and lovers, by medical intervention, and by Kelly’s own discipline. Normality is presented both as relief and as a demanding standard: a condition others declare achieved, but one that must repeatedly be maintained.
The childhood history of correction
From birth, Kelly had strabismus: the muscles of her left eye were weaker than those of her right. During the first two years of her life, she experienced overlapping images rather than a single, coordinated view; the left-eye image could seem to float loose, while she instinctively relied on the stronger right eye. To her parents, Artie Kelleher and Madelyn Kelleher, this appeared as an eye that wandered left while the other met a viewer’s gaze. The account insists on both the defect’s physical reality and the distress that gathered around it: her parents watched her eyes, tested her responses, and worried about what the difference might mean.
The Kellehers’ response was divided between competing forms of treatment. One doctor recommended exercises and a strict regimen; another advised an operation, warning that the weaker eye might become permanently atrophied if the condition continued. Madelyn and her mother, Grandma Ross, hoped the exercises would work, with support from an optimistic therapist. Artie, however, imagined the prospect of Kelly being teased at school and pressed Madelyn to consider the consequences if treatment failed. His alarm arose alongside his love for his daughter, but it was also connected to his emphasis on physical health, well-being, attractiveness, and normality. The family’s concern was thus not only about how Kelly saw, but also about how other people might see her.
Eventually Artie took a weekday morning off, and the elder Kellehers drove Kelly from Gowanda Heights in Westchester County to Beth Israel Hospital on East End Avenue in New York City, a forty-minute journey. Surgery corrected the eye. Recovery was quick, though not painless as promised, and afterward the eyes and the child seemed, by outward signs, normal. This resolution is deliberately framed through appearance: the operation changes the visible sign of difference, while the earlier experience and family anxiety remain part of Kelly’s history.
Appearance and the work of normality
As an adult, Kelly describes her eyes as wide-set, large, attractive, and normal, but not especially distinctive. They are more gray than green, like pebbles, and their lashes are so pale and thin that they are scarcely visible without mascara, which she dislikes. The description makes normality less a simple medical endpoint than a judgment made through everyday appearance: the corrected eyes can be called normal, yet Kelly continues to notice and assess the details of her face.
Her skin makes that scrutiny more painful. At twenty-six years and eight months, she is distressed by adolescent-like acne, small bumps at her hairline, hives, rashes, and allergies that inflame her eyes. She regards her thin, fair skin as too thin and too fair, and experiences these conditions with shame and anger. Such complaints are not equivalent to her childhood strabismus, but together they show how closely self-worth is tied to bodily appearance. The face that once bore a visible condition now becomes the site of renewed worry about whether she looks sufficiently well and attractive.
The novel also connects bodily presentation to preparation and control. Before the island excursion with The Senator, Kelly takes unusual care to file and polish her fingernails, choosing a subdued pale pink-coral-bronze to match her lipstick. This small act is distinct from medical correction, but it belongs to the same field of attention: appearance is something she can arrange, refine, and bring into line with an anticipated occasion. The polished nails register deliberate self-presentation rather than an effortless state of being normal.
Weight, discipline, and recovery
Kelly’s efforts to regulate her body extend beyond appearance. Since her freshman year at Brown University, she has starved herself to exercise rigorous control, lighten her menstrual periods, and, after her relationship with G-----, punish herself for having loved him more than he seemed to love her. The practice gives bodily control several different functions: it manages a physical process, asserts discipline, and turns emotional pain inward. The novel does not treat thinness as a neutral preference, because the behavior is explicitly linked to punishment and deprivation.
During the year before the island excursion, Kelly resolves to be healthy. She forces herself to eat regularly and regains eleven of the twenty pounds she had lost. She also sleeps without sleeping pills and no longer needs even the single glass of red wine that she and G----- had made a bedtime ritual during the three months he lived with her. These changes mark recovery through concrete routines: eating, sleeping, and relinquishing a shared habit. Kelly calls the result regained health and normality, but the effort required to reach it shows that normality is neither automatic nor simply bestowed by medical treatment.
Her declaration that she is an American girl who wants to look her best and give her all turns the recovered body into an outward-facing ideal. The phrase links wellness to national identity and performance: the body should be healthy, presentable, and ready to act. That ideal sits beside the private history of starvation, distress after G-----, and ongoing attention to skin and features. What appears to be confident normality is therefore also work—an effort to make bodily health signify restored personal command.
The injured body and the limits of control
The concept becomes more urgent after the Toyota leaves the road and sinks into black water. Kelly is trapped, and a sudden exertion allows her to lift herself partly free of whatever is clamping her knee. Her right foot is entirely without sensation; she cannot move its toes or feel them, and the foot seems almost nonexistent to her. She considers whether it might be severed, then reasons that she would have bled to death if so much time had passed. Even the words for toes and foot quickly lose clarity in her mind. In this scene the body is not being evaluated for attractiveness or corrected toward an outward norm; it is a damaged, uncertain field of sensation whose condition governs what movement remains possible.
Kelly’s characteristic optimism persists as the terms of bodily normality collapse. The loss of sensation does not become evidence that she has ceased to be herself; instead, she stops dwelling on the confusing concepts of her foot and continues trying to survive. When she bargains with the imagined rescue team, she offers her right leg, even both legs, for amputation and promises to sign a release and not sue. The bargain gives her a way to express the priority of survival over bodily wholeness. She even imagines taking the blame herself, as Artie Kelleher would do in a legal dispute, while insisting that she would explain the circumstances.
Across these episodes, normality is neither a single medical fact nor an uncomplicated ideal. Surgery makes Kelly’s eye appear corrected; adult self-discipline helps her regain weight and ordinary sleep; and the accident confronts her with a body whose capacities cannot be secured by appearance, habit, or will. The narrative’s insistence on those different circumstances separates bodily conditions from the judgments placed on them. It also reveals the cost of treating normality as a standard that a person must continually achieve: Kelly is made to monitor her face and weight, while in the submerged car the urgent question is no longer whether her body looks right, but what it can still endure and do.
