Dissociative amnesia
Call Me YoursDissociative amnesia shapes Kayla Renae Morrison’s understanding of her own life by leaving crucial personal experiences inaccessible while allowing isolated fragments to surface. She cannot remember the appearance of Adi’s father, the birth of Adi, or her early childhood; she also cannot recall loving or wanting her daughter. These gaps reach beyond forgotten facts: they disrupt Kayla’s sense of herself as a mother and make her relationship with Adi feel as though it began without a remembered past.
The Pattern of Missing Memory
Kayla’s recollections are incomplete rather than uniformly absent. When an ugly memory intrudes, she recognizes it as connected to Adi’s father and to the night Adi was conceived, but what returns is only a narrow sequence: Kayla and the man are alone in a deserted park, sitting at the back of his truck, and he kisses her. She remembers consenting and pleading with him to make her his woman, yet cannot remember what he looked like. The scene gives her a past event without restoring the person at its center.
The narrative makes the distinction between an available fragment and a missing life especially stark. Kayla is glad that her mind has shut the man out, but the same erasure has taken other memories with it: when Adi was born, portions of Kayla’s early childhood, and any memory of loving or wanting Adi. Her account therefore does not describe a single blank around one painful encounter. It encompasses both an obscured conception and the ordinary, formative experiences that might have connected mother and daughter across time.
Motherhood Without a Remembered Beginning
For Kayla, the absence surrounding Adi’s birth has an intimate consequence. She experiences her daughter almost as someone who appeared in her life fully formed: she feels as if she woke one day to discover she had a sixteen-year-old daughter. The shock is compounded by Adi’s resentment. Kayla must face the relationship in its present tense without access to the memories that might explain its beginnings or supply a felt history of maternal attachment.
That gap is not proof that Kayla never loved or wanted Adi. The account is precise about what is unavailable to her: she does not remember those feelings. This difference matters. Her amnesia makes the emotional history inaccessible, while Adi’s resentment makes the consequences of that absence visible within the family. Kayla’s difficulty is thus not simply that she cannot retrieve a date or event; she cannot rely on memory to assure her of a bond whose importance is being tested in the present.
Childhood Recalled Through Clothing and the Mirror
A later childhood recollection gives Kayla access to a different, deeply personal part of her past. In a remembered scene, she looks at her reflection in her mother’s vanity and sees a little blonde girl with blue eyes. Her mother enters and asks why Jamie is wearing a dress. The child has found dresses in boxes in the attic and wants to know why they were hidden. The recollection gives a concrete setting to a childhood experience that Kayla had not been able to narrate as part of an accessible personal history.
The clothes become evidence of a conflict between the child’s sense of self and the identity imposed on her. Kayla remembers that her mother had bought girls’ clothing from infancy through age twelve; she secretly wore dresses, even when some were too small, and disliked both boys’ clothes and being called Jamie. She recalls seeing her mother look longingly at other girls and feeling unseen beside her. When her mother tells Jamie that she loves her son, the child understands the reassurance through the pain of not being recognized as a girl. The memory therefore restores more than a sequence of childhood actions: it gives Kayla a remembered account of concealment, longing, and the effort to be seen.
Kayla also recalls what followed. When her parents were out, she wore her mother’s clothes, wig, and shoes, and learned makeup, posture, and speech. She connects the need to pretend to be Jamie with her lack of close relationships, and remembers leaving home for good at eighteen. These details make the recovered childhood material a sustained history rather than a single image. They also contrast with the missing memories of Adi’s birth: some parts of Kayla’s past return with objects, scenes, and a clear sense of feeling, while other foundational events remain beyond her recall.
Photographs, Other People, and the Work of Knowing
Where personal memory fails, Kayla encounters family history through other people and physical records. Jessica Cooper places a family photo album before her. Its early pages show Jessica’s wedding to Jamie Cooper, with their names written beneath the pictures; they appear happy together. Kayla looks at the photographs and learns that Jessica is married. The album supplies visible evidence of a relationship and a past that Kayla does not already know, but looking at the images is not the same as recovering a memory of them.
In another exchange, Kayla takes a picture from her purse and offers it to Jamie, introducing the image as someone he should meet. The photograph shows a round-cheeked baby in a bassinet. It is a deliberate act of sharing an image where her own account of the past is incomplete: the picture can be seen and passed between them even when the memories attached to family history cannot simply be assumed. Together, the album and the baby photograph underscore the difference between evidence of a life and remembered experience of it.
Narrative Significance
The story presents amnesia through uneven returns rather than a complete recovery. A memory of the conception night breaks into the present but stops before the man’s identity can be recalled; a childhood scene becomes legible through the mirror, the attic clothes, and the mother’s words; photographs make relationships visible without giving Kayla those relationships as memories. Each form of evidence has a different limit. A fragment can recover an action without a face, a recollection can restore a child’s feelings without repairing what was lost, and a photograph can document a family without supplying a remembered bond.
This structure makes the gaps consequential in two directions. They shape how Kayla understands her own identity, and they affect how she can inhabit relationships with other people, especially Adi. The narrative does not equate lack of recollection with lack of feeling or treat every blank as resolved by a recovered scene. Instead, it shows Kayla assembling an account from what returns, what others reveal, and what images preserve—while the missing beginnings remain a real part of her present.