Readify

The marriage of Semyon Marmeladov and Katerina Ivanovna

Crime and Punishment

The marriage between Semyon Zaharovitch Marmeladov and Katerina Ivanovna is founded on an attempt to relieve suffering, but becomes entangled with poverty, dependence, and Marmeladov’s alcoholism. He remembers offering marriage because he could not bear to see her destitution; she accepted when she had no other place to turn. Later, his drinking repeatedly undermines the household, even as he describes himself as emotionally attached to his wife and painfully aware of the cost his conduct imposes on her.

Katerina’s Earlier Marriage and Loss

Before marrying Marmeladov, Katerina had been the wife of an infantry officer and the mother of three children. She had married her first husband for love and left her father’s home with him. He later succumbed to gambling, got into trouble, and died. Marmeladov says that her first husband beat her toward the end of their marriage, yet Katerina continued to remember him with tears and to recall their former happiness. Marmeladov says he was glad she could still imagine herself as having once been happy, a glimpse of tenderness within his account of their difficult life together.

After her first husband’s death, Katerina was left with the children in a remote district and in extreme poverty. Her relatives had turned away from her. Marmeladov stresses that she was proud as well as educated, and that she came from a distinguished family. She had attended a high-class school for the daughters of noblemen and, on graduating, danced before the governor and other officials. She received a gold medal and a certificate of merit. The medal had long since been sold, but she kept the certificate in her trunk and showed it to their landlady. That act preserved a record of the standing and achievement that hardship had not erased from her sense of herself.

A Marriage Offered as Rescue

Marmeladov was a widower when he offered Katerina his hand, and he had a fourteen-year-old daughter from his first marriage. He presents his offer as a response to Katerina’s suffering: he says he could not bear to see it. In his telling, her agreement was itself evidence of how severe her circumstances had become. She married him despite her education, family background, and pride because she had nowhere else to turn. His account therefore makes the marriage neither a simple courtship nor a secure escape from hardship, but a decision made under the pressure of poverty and abandonment.

For a year after the marriage, Marmeladov says, he performed his duties conscientiously and did not drink. He emphasizes this period as proof that he had feelings and had tried to be a responsible husband. Nevertheless, he says he could not please Katerina. He then lost his position in changes at the office, which he says were not his fault, and resumed drinking. His explanation distinguishes that initial loss of employment from a later one: after the family came to Saint Petersburg, he obtained another position but eventually lost it through his own weakness. The account presents his decline as a sequence in which genuine efforts and external reversals give way to a destructive relapse.

Domestic Hardship and Marmeladov’s Relapse

The family had been in Saint Petersburg for about a year and a half by the time Marmeladov tells his story. They lived in part of a room at Amalia Fyodorovna Lippevechsel’s, alongside other residents, amid dirt and disorder. Katerina worked from morning to night, cleaning and washing the children; Marmeladov says she had been accustomed to cleanliness since childhood. He describes her chest as weak and says that she had begun coughing blood. He also admits that he sold her stockings and a mohair shawl that had been given to her, using the proceeds for drink. These admissions make the contrast in their marriage stark: she labors to maintain the household while his drinking consumes even her belongings.

Marmeladov does not describe himself as unaware of the damage. He says that the more he drank, the more he felt Katerina’s illness and the family’s suffering, and that he sought sympathy in drink even while it intensified his distress. He also says that Katerina sometimes pulled his hair and insists on interpreting the gesture as an expression of pity. That interpretation reveals how insistently he searches for signs that she still feels for him, but it does not undo the imbalance he has described between her daily labor and his repeated failures.

Theft, Separation, and the Household’s Crisis

The immediate breakdown he recounts follows a brief return to employment and a renewed hope of helping the family. Marmeladov says he had spent a day imagining that he would provide clothes for the children, give Katerina rest, and bring his daughter back into the family’s care. The next day, however, he secretly took the key to Katerina’s box and stole what remained of his earnings. He had been away from home for five days by the time he told the story. His uniform was left at a tavern near the Egyptian Bridge, exchanged for the clothes he was wearing, and he understood that his employment was over.

When he finally returned, Katerina searched him and found no money. Twelve silver roubles had been left in the chest, and she realized that he had drunk the money away. She dragged him into the room by his hair; Marmeladov submitted rather than resisting. The children woke or became frightened amid the confrontation, while Katerina pointed to them as hungry. The scene gives the marriage’s recurring crisis a concrete form: his professed remorse and attachment coexist with the theft that leaves the household without money, and Katerina’s anger is bound to the immediate needs of the children. The account does not resolve their relationship; it ends with the consequences of his return exposed in the room they share.