Readify

Victoria Bergman’s sexual abuse by her father

Crow Girl

Victoria Bergman’s sexual abuse by her father began in early puberty and took place within a family in which the adults who might have protected her did not stop it. The narrative presents the abuse through fragmented memories and later recollection, linking the violence not to a single isolated incident but to a recurring pattern that shaped Victoria’s sense of safety and self.

Childhood and the Beginning of the Abuse

Victoria was the only child of Bengt Bergman, an investigator for the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, and Birgitta Bergman, a housewife. She grew up in Grisslinge, in Värmdö outside Stockholm, and spent summers in Dala-Floda. Highly intelligent, she began school a year early, attended private school from the age of nine, and was moved from year eight to year nine. These markers of precocious ability sit beside a childhood whose memories are described as fragmentary and difficult to place in a coherent sequence.

The abuse began around puberty. The account identifies Victoria’s father as the perpetrator, while the broader recollections are often presented as disconnected associations rather than as a continuous explanation. At school, Victoria was two years younger than her classmates and less physically and emotionally developed than they were; the contrast underscores how young and vulnerable she was during this period, without making her precocity a protection against what was happening at home.

A journey to Dala-Floda exposes the pattern of coercion and silence within the family. Before leaving, Victoria said she did not want to go with her father and would rather stay home. He responded by pouring milk over her, while Birgitta looked away. Victoria was taken on the journey nonetheless, carrying intense anxiety. Her refusal did not change the decision, and her mother’s silence left her without an effective ally in the immediate situation.

A Repeated Pattern of Coercion and Silence

The journey to Dala-Floda reveals that the abuse was not confined to one encounter. After leaving Victoria at the cottage, her father drove away; she expected him to return on the pretext that he had forgotten something, and knew the same demand would follow. The departures and returns made the abuse predictable without making it avoidable. Victoria’s certainty about what would happen next shows how thoroughly the pattern had shaped her expectations, while the adults’ earlier silence had left her with no reliable protection.

A later recollection on a therapy recording extends this pattern to regular sauna visits. Victoria remembered her father’s unwanted attention, her own silence, and washing afterward, while also recalling the family explanation that his conduct was meant to prepare her for future relationships and make her resilient. She had learned to comply and to take pride in doing what he praised, a response that turned coercion into apparent competence. The recording also preserves her sense that cleanliness could not undo what had happened. By placing these rationalizations beside her unease and self-silencing, the narrative shows how abuse was sustained not only through repeated acts but through a family language that presented endurance as strength.

Fragmented Memory and Detachment

A separate scene set in Dala-Floda in 1980 places Victoria’s childhood distress alongside an episode of glue inhalation: as its effects intensify, she experiences herself as if viewed from above, and the narrative calls this detached figure Crow Girl. The scene does not explain the episode as a direct consequence of the abuse, but its placement within the childhood material adds another form of distance to the fragmented memories surrounding that period. Where the recurring coercion made Victoria anticipate what would happen next, the altered perspective makes the self appear briefly separate from the person undergoing experience. Together, these narrative choices present her childhood not as a continuous account she can readily command, but as memories and states of perception disclosed in pieces.

Consequences in Adolescence and Retrospective Meaning

The account follows Victoria beyond the childhood episodes into a troubled adolescence, while stopping short of reducing every later difficulty to a single cause. From around fourteen or fifteen, she had suicidal thoughts and was prone to risk-taking; her early teenage years were later characterized as weak, and self-destructive behavior recurred. At Sigtuna boarding school, she was two years younger than her classmates and substantially less physically and emotionally developed, making the social distance between her and her peers part of the portrait of this conflicted period. These details extend the account from repeated abuse and enforced silence to the vulnerability that continued into her youth. The memories arrive in fragments, and Sofia Zetterlund’s later recognition of how difficult Victoria’s school years had been gives those fragments a retrospective frame without turning them into a complete or uncomplicated explanation.