David Copperfield—Uriah Heep
David CopperfieldDavid Copperfield’s connection with Uriah Heep is a gradual contest over knowledge and influence: Heep presents himself as a deferential acquaintance while learning what David knows about the people around him, then turns David’s own earlier suspicions into leverage. The relation shifts from wary curiosity to manipulation and open repudiation, with David’s eventual blow marking the moment he refuses to be used as Heep’s unwitting ally.
An Uneasy First Impression
David first encounters Uriah Heep in the office of Mr. Wickfield, where Heep is copying a document at a desk in a small circular room. The sheet hanging from a brass frame partly screens him, but David notices Heep’s sleepless eyes slipping below it to watch him. David tries to distract himself by looking at a map and reading a newspaper, yet keeps finding his attention drawn back to the stare. The scene establishes their connection as one of mutual observation, though the two are not equally alert to what is happening: David is uncomfortable and curious, while Heep appears to conceal his attention behind the performance of work.
A later encounter makes that uneasy impression physical. After walking in the street near the old houses and the Cathedral, David finds Heep shutting the office and greets him in a friendly mood. He shakes Heep’s hand, then recoils from its clamminess. The contact remains in his memory after he returns to his room; even a face carved on a beam-end seems to him like Heep, and he shuts the imagined figure out of the window. David’s response is not yet a considered judgment of Heep’s character, but his instinctive revulsion stands in sharp contrast to the civility he has just offered. The relationship begins with an unresolved mixture of friendliness, fascination, and bodily distrust.
Deference and the Gathering of Information
When David later visits Heep and his mother, Heep’s manner encourages confidence. He describes himself as very humble, and his mother insists that they know their station and are thankful for it. The pair attend to David and offer him the best food at their table, though the meal itself is not especially fine. Their show of respect helps him feel like the patron of his hosts rather than the object of their inquiry. As David later recognizes, however, their attention and conversational skill work together to draw out information.
The questioning begins with familiar subjects: aunts, parents, and family life. David tells them about his aunt and the people who raised him, but stops when the conversation reaches his stepfather, because his aunt had told him to keep silent about that subject. He does not tell them about his time at Murdstone and Grinby or his journey to Canterbury. Instead, Heep and his mother turn the conversation toward Mr. Wickfield and Agnes Wickfield, shifting smoothly among Mr. Wickfield’s business and resources, David’s admiration for Agnes, their home life, and the amount Mr. Wickfield drinks. David finds himself repeatedly disclosing things he had no intention of revealing, and notices Heep’s nostrils twitching as he does so. The exchange makes their relationship asymmetrical: David believes he is speaking freely among respectful acquaintances, while Heep and his mother guide the discussion toward matters useful to them.
Heep’s self-description reinforces that imbalance. When David asks whether he is already a great lawyer, Heep denies it and calls himself the humblest person going. He adds that his mother is humble, their home is humble, and his father’s former occupation was humble. The repetition frames Heep as socially modest, but in David’s encounters it accompanies a persistent attentiveness to other people’s affairs. David is drawn to Heep even when he is uneasy about him: on another evening, he chooses Heep’s small office over Mr. Wickfield’s room, where he had been invited to sit and read. He finds Heep absorbed in a large book, tracing its lines with a long finger, and stays to talk. That voluntary return shows how Heep’s strangeness exerts a fascination alongside David’s distrust; the young man has not yet converted his discomfort into distance.
From Acquaintance to Complicity
The decisive rupture comes when Heep tries to draw David into a dispute involving Doctor Strong and Annie Strong. Mr. Wickfield admits that he had doubted Annie and had sometimes resented her close relation with Agnes, though he says he never intended those suspicions to become known. Doctor Strong responds with compassion. Heep then intervenes, saying that David had noticed the matter too. David immediately challenges his right to bring him into it. Heep insists that David understood what he meant when they had spoken before and treats David’s denial as something that should not be made.
Heep’s appeal makes David’s earlier uncertainty serve Heep’s purpose. David recognizes that the allusion to his old misgivings is not an innocent recollection: Heep has forced a confidence on him in order to distress him and has deliberately set a trap. The betrayal is particularly sharp because Heep presents David as a participant in a shared understanding, converting an unspoken impression into apparent corroboration. David cannot undo the fact that his face has betrayed his former suspicions, but he rejects Heep’s attempt to turn that weakness into consent.
The Break and Its Meaning
After the encounter, Heep addresses David meekly and claims that the situation has gone well enough for the family to be safe. David, enraged by the sound of his voice, accuses him of entrapping him in his schemes. Seeing Heep’s stealthy exultation, David strikes him across the cheek with an open hand. Heep catches David’s hand, and the two remain facing each other until the white marks of David’s fingers fade into the deep red of the blow. The physical confrontation gives visible form to a conflict that had previously worked through watching, conversation, and insinuation.
David then defines the break in direct terms: he has taken leave of Heep and will know no more of him. He says that he has shown his contempt before and has now shown it more plainly, and that he no longer fears Heep’s doing his worst to those around him. That last claim matters because David had previously held back in communicating with Heep out of concern for the people Heep might harm. The blow and the refusal to continue the relationship mark a change from guarded silence to open resistance. Their connection is therefore not merely an antagonism between two unlike personalities: it records Heep’s effort to make David’s candour and past doubts useful to him, and David’s eventual decision to refuse that imposed complicity.