Anne and Daddy
Diary of Anne FrankAnne and Daddy is a relationship of deep attachment and incomplete understanding. Anne regards Otto Frank as the person she loves most and turns to him for safety and sympathy; at the same time, she longs for a more personal recognition than his affection as a father seems to provide. The diary records this bond not as simple harmony but as the emotional center of a family conflict, especially as Anne’s relationship with her mother grows more difficult.
Early Trust and the Decision to Hide
In a walk around the neighborhood square, Otto raised the prospect of hiding and explained that the family had been moving clothes, food, and furniture for more than a year. They wanted to prevent their belongings from being seized and, above all, to avoid falling into German hands; leaving voluntarily, he said, would be preferable to waiting to be taken away. Anne asked when this would happen. His seriousness frightened her, but he told her not to worry and urged her to enjoy her carefree life while she could. His words offer reassurance, yet the conversation also introduces the danger that will soon define their shared life.
Otto’s care is also reflected in the preparation of the hiding place. Once Margot’s call-up notice forced the family to move their departure forward by ten days, Anne learned that the refuge was in her father’s office building. The office staff who knew of the plan included Mr. Kugler, Mr. Kleiman, Miep, and Bep Voskuijl; the warehouse workers were not informed. Otto’s work and relationships thus became part of the practical structure that protected his family, even as the choice to hide exposed Anne to the loss of ordinary freedom and the strain of living in confinement.
A Bond That Sustains and Hurts
Anne’s feelings toward Otto stand in sharp contrast to the estrangement she describes with her mother. After a quarrel, Anne said that she loved her father more than her mother. Otto treated this as a passing phase, but Anne did not believe that explanation. She wrote that his death seemed inconceivable to her, whereas she could imagine her mother dying, and worried that he might read what she had written. The distinction is not presented as a settled judgment about either parent so much as an account of the intense, unequal attachments through which Anne was trying to understand herself.
In a later reflection on family favoritism, Anne describes the pain of seeing Otto approve of Margot’s actions, praise her, and embrace her. She insists that her feeling is not envy of Margot’s intelligence or beauty: what she wants is to know that her father loves her for herself, not merely because she is his child. The distinction gives her longing its particular force. She does not ask only for affection; she wants to be taken seriously as Anne, with a separate character and inner life.
That need is sharpened by Anne’s sense that Otto avoids discussions about her mother’s failings. She clings to him because she feels her attachment to her mother weakening, yet his reluctance to hear her complaints leaves her without a way to resolve the conflict. Anne recognizes that she cannot simply confront her mother with every grievance, but also feels unable to keep accepting blame. In describing herself as having to mother herself, she links her independence to a gap in the care she believes a mother should provide. Otto remains her emotional refuge, but he cannot make that gap disappear.
Confidentiality, Writing, and Self-Reliance
Anne writes that Otto is always kind and understands her, while wishing they could have a heart-to-heart conversation without her immediately bursting into tears. This juxtaposition captures the closeness and distance in their bond: she trusts his goodwill, but feels unable to communicate everything she needs to say. She also recognizes that her age may contribute to the difficulty. The diary becomes the private place where thoughts that cannot be spoken openly can be developed and examined.
When Anne asks who else could comfort her, she returns to the diary because Kitty is patient. She promises to keep going, find her own way, and hold back her tears, while wishing for encouragement from someone who loves her. The promise shows how attachment to Otto and the pursuit of independence coexist. She wants his understanding, but she also begins to imagine a self-directed course that does not depend on receiving the recognition she hopes for.
The Relationship in the Diary’s Later History
The surviving account of Anne and Otto’s relationship reaches readers through several textual stages. Anne first kept the diary for herself; after hearing Gerrit Bolkestein call for wartime letters and diaries to be collected after the war, she decided to make a book from her writing. She revised it as version b while continuing the original, version a, omitting some passages and adding others from memory. The intimate record of her family life therefore includes both contemporaneous diary writing and a deliberate later effort to shape it for readers.
After Anne’s arrest, Miep Gies found the diaries scattered on the floor and put them away unread. Once it became clear that Anne was dead, she gave them to Otto. He selected material from versions a and b to create the shorter version c, published as The Diary of a Young Girl. His editorial decisions were shaped by the limits of the Dutch publisher’s series, the conventions of the 1947 young-adult market, and his wish to spare the dead, including his wife and the other residents of the Secret Annex, from unflattering passages. The relationship thus appears in a text partly preserved and partly mediated by the father whose place in it matters so much to Anne.
After Otto’s death in 1980, he willed Anne’s manuscripts to the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation. Following investigation of the diary’s authenticity, the Institute published the versions and its findings in a critical edition. The Anne Frank-Fonds later commissioned Mirjam Pressler to prepare an expanded edition for general readers, supplementing Otto’s selection with passages from versions a and b and adding approximately 30 percent more material. These editions do not erase Otto’s role as the parent who received Anne’s diary and chose to publish it. They do, however, let readers encounter more of the differences between Anne’s original record, her own revision, and her father’s posthumous selection—an editorial history that gives the documented intimacy and incompleteness of their relationship an afterlife beyond the family.