Inferno
Don't Leave God Alone: How to Get God's Attention, Remain in His Presence, and Even Change His Mind to Make a Difference in Your WorldHell is not described as a physical setting visited by the characters but as part of the spiritual geography invoked to explain death, delay, and release. Its decisive significance lies in the claim that prayer, exercised with persistence and spiritual authority, can challenge the powers that appear to hold people, answers, or “dead dreams” beyond reach.
Definition and Spiritual Setting
Hell appears alongside death and the grave as a realm whose apparent claim can be resisted. In the discussion of Lazarus, the delay before Jesus arrived is interpreted as more than a postponement: it announced to “the spirits of death, hell, and the grave” that they would no longer retain the keys. The raising of Lazarus therefore becomes a model for the book’s wider argument that what has entered a seemingly final domain may still be summoned back into life.
The book’s language makes Hell part of an unseen conflict rather than an ordinary location. Spiritual barriers can stand between prayer and its earthly answer, and the believer is urged to use authority against those barriers. Hell consequently functions as the extreme image of confinement: the place associated with irreversible loss, yet also the place whose apparent finality is challenged by divine intervention.
Death, Crisis, and the Threat of Finality
Several narratives place human beings at the edge of death, giving Hell its strongest thematic context. On an interstate at night, the narrator found a young man who had been struck while trying to cross the highway. The victim’s head was so swollen and bloodied that his features were difficult to recognize, and the narrator considered it a miracle that he was still alive and breathing. He prayed over him, commanded life to return, and encouraged him to call on Jesus, after which the injured man repeated a request for Jesus to enter his heart.
A hospital case presents an even more explicit spiritual emergency. The narrator said that an elderly relative in a coma would die at 4:00 p.m. that day, then learned that she had never asked Jesus to be her Lord and Savior. He instructed the family to clear the room, awaken her in Jesus’s name, and share the gospel before the stated time. In this account, the danger of Hell is not treated as an abstract afterlife doctrine but as the urgent possibility of entering eternity without faith in Jesus.
The family’s later “Lazarus situation” develops the same movement from medical extremity toward spiritual resistance. On July 4, the narrator’s wife’s father developed a fever of 104 degrees. By December, the fever returned, and emergency surgery revealed diverticulitis with a ruptured bowel. Septic shock followed months of undetected infection. After surgery, he was placed in a medical coma, swelled to three times his normal size, developed a fever of 105 degrees, and suffered failure of his liver, kidneys, and lungs while receiving dialysis, ventilation, and nineteen intravenous bags of medicines, fluids, blood, and food under the care of eight physicians. The crisis turned the language of grave and Hell into a framework for refusing to accept death as the final word.
Prayer Against Spiritual Delay
The book connects Hell with the possibility that answers may be delayed by hostile spiritual forces. The delay of Jesus’s arrival before Lazarus’s resurrection is treated as purposeful, while Daniel’s prayer is cited as an example of a twenty-one-day obstruction: his prayer was heard from the first day, but a spirit called the prince of Persia delayed the answer until Michael was sent. These examples establish a distinction between God’s failure to hear and an answer’s being hindered before it becomes visible.
Within this framework, prayers are carried before God and returned as answers to the earth, while evil spirits may stand as stones or barriers that prevent what is desired from manifesting. The believer is therefore told to command dreams to come forth and to exercise authority over the spirits influencing the delay. Hell signifies the opposing side of that contest, but the narrative insists that its forces are not sovereign.
Persistence, Healing, and Release
The same principle is applied to illness. The woman with the issue of blood had suffered through many physicians, spent all she had, and become “nothing bettered, but rather grew worse.” Her condition is presented as a downward spiral that could be stopped only by reaching toward Jesus, the true physician. Her persistence becomes an image of refusing to abandon the sole source of healing even when ordinary remedies have failed.
The narrator applies this teaching to a severe cough that worsened after repeated medical visits. Doctors identified it only as some kind of virus and continued prescribing medicines without determining whether they could cure it. After the narrator and Brenda became determined about their healing covenant with God, they used their Bibles, spoke God’s Word over the condition, and commanded the coughing to stop in Jesus’s name. The account says that victory came after a short period of refusing to leave God alone. Hell is thus not presented only as a destination after death; it also represents the spiritual logic of defeat, bondage, and apparent inevitability that persistent prayer is meant to break.
A similar pattern appears in the church’s prayers for a newborn girl whose platelet count was extremely low and whose incurable disease attacked her liver and blood. Doctors gave her only an 11 percent chance of living, and the situation continued to deteriorate despite days of prayer. The narrator nevertheless rejected the conclusion that the child’s condition had to end in death, while her parents and others joined that determination. The episode reinforces the book’s central contrast between visible medical probability and the spiritual authority it believes can summon life from the edge of the grave.
Public Risk and Collective Responsibility
Hell’s significance extends beyond private crises into collective responsibility. After the September 11 attacks, churches and prayer meetings filled as people sought God amid confusion, but the renewed dependence lasted only briefly. The book warns that seeking God only when trouble arrives is dangerous because people may accept Jesus as Savior without making Him Lord through regular commitment.
The same warning is applied to the war in Iraq. The narrator contrasts the seizure of Baghdad after twenty-one days with the later period of military deaths and widespread violence, attributing the difference, in his interpretation, to the decline of prayer for service members. The initial conflict had been met with a mandate of prayer, but prayer coverage later weakened. Leaving God alone on that matter, the book argues, placed military lives at risk. In this account, Hell belongs to a wider theology of exposure: when prayer is abandoned, individuals and communities are imagined as moving away from God’s protective hand.
Hell therefore operates as the negative horizon of the book’s call to daily fellowship with God. It names the ultimate threat of separation, but it also gathers together the forces of death, delay, fear, and defeat that the narratives repeatedly confront. Against that horizon, the book’s recurring discipline is sustained prayer—not merely emergency prayer after disaster, but a continuing hunger for communion that seeks divine intervention before crisis becomes final.