Gerard Inchon
Down Cemetery RoadGerard Inchon is a wealthy, socially assured businessman whose controlled manners sit alongside a bluntly transactional view of war, money, and other people. Sarah Trafford first encounters him as a conspicuous figure in Mark Trafford’s business world, then comes to suspect him of helping to shape the danger around her. When his financial dealings are finally laid bare, he proves neither a simple benefactor nor merely the villain Sarah imagined: he has laundered sanctioned money to fund arms purchases, yet he does not turn Sarah and Michael Downey away when they seek help finding Dinah Singleton.
Identity and Public Persona
Sarah’s first impression of Gerard is of a man in his mid-thirties whose appearance seems older: paunchy and heavy-featured, with oily dark hair scraped back from a widow’s peak and a double chin. Mark describes him as a forceful mover in business, expanding east while others retreat. Sarah’s private translation of that reputation is less flattering. She sees a veneer of civilization covering something predatory, and understands why Mark would call him a catch only in the language of commerce.
Gerard’s physical presence does not make him clumsy. At a gathering in Sarah’s home, he moves with small, controlled gestures, punctuating his speech with an unlit cigar held between long, chubby fingers. He asks permission to smoke and accepts Sarah’s refusal without visible irritation. The restraint, however, does not make him seem gentle to her: she judges him a bastard, and the cigar’s deliberate, almost emblematic movements sharpen rather than soften that impression. Her reaction establishes the distance between his composed surface and her suspicion of what it conceals.
His social manner varies according to his audience. He talks easily with Mark about finance, in terms that leave the other guests outside the conversation; with Sarah he is slyly polite, while with Wigwam and Rufus he seems positively dangerous. At dinner he eats everything served, but Sarah finds conversation harder to manage than his appetite. Rather than establish common ground, he probes people and seems to choose subjects that might unsettle them. His civility is therefore less a sign of openness than a flexible instrument of social control.
Business, War, and Moral Outlook
Gerard states his most unsettling business principle in a discussion of escalating tension in the Middle East: “Nothing boosts the economy like a good war.” He is not talking about the rising price of ordinary goods, but about large contracts, helicopter production, employment in whole towns, and the media excitement surrounding conflict. The remark makes explicit the economic viewpoint beneath his polished manners: war is not only a human catastrophe but also a market opportunity. The contrast with Wigwam’s shame and horror places Gerard on the side of those who can watch the crisis through television and stock listings.
Sarah later associates him with the bombing of the Singleton house. At his Cotswold home, his welcoming manner becomes, in retrospect, the moment she identifies as the point when she decided Gerard had planted the bomb. That is Sarah’s suspicion, not a confirmation of his responsibility. Her conviction nevertheless shapes how she interprets subsequent events: when she fears that he has withdrawn support from Mark, she imagines it as indirect revenge for her investigation, and remembers that Gerard collects guns. The disparity between what she believes and what the evidence establishes is central to his role in her story.
The same uncertainty follows Sarah’s reading of Joe Silvermann’s murder and the attempt to frame her. She names Gerard as the likely force behind the plot, reasoning that somebody has removed evidence of her work with Joe and hidden Dinah. But even as she suspects Gerard, she cannot picture him personally planting drugs in her purse or using Joe’s razor to kill Joe. She concludes that he must have accomplices; the narrative at this stage sustains her fear without proving that her attribution is correct.
Sarah’s Return and the Financial Revelation
After Sarah and Michael reach London, she goes to Gerard’s large detached home in Hampstead. A high, immaculately kept hedge screens the property; potted bay trees flank the front door, and the gravel drive appears so perfectly maintained that even the nearby car seems scarcely to have moved. The house projects expenditure without the need to display it, a suburban counterpart to Gerard’s polished public image. Sarah has found the address through what she remembers of conversations about Hampstead. Gerard answers the door himself, apparently surprised to see her and Michael.
Inside, Sarah’s purpose is practical: she needs help, and Michael makes clear that what she needs is a gun. Gerard asks whether they have money and says he would be happy to help, while appearing amused by the request. His response is not a declaration of innocence or a surrender of control; it is a limited offer made in a conversation where Sarah and Michael need something from him. His willingness to entertain their request complicates the threatening figure Sarah has constructed without resolving the distrust between them.
Michael explains what he has found: Gerard laundered sanctioned, rather than criminal, money arriving from near the Persian Gulf. He channelled it through offshore trusts in Jersey, Liechtenstein, and the Cayman Islands; a small portion remained in an account bearing his number, while the rest emerged as stateless money to fund arms purchases. Gerard is expected to claim that he was duped, but Michael says the paper trail is conspicuous and that he investigates before taking on investment advisers. He adds that Mark should have known what Gerard was doing. The revelation ties Gerard’s financial conduct to the arms trade and recasts the business acumen Sarah once heard praised as a direct route from offshore finance to weapons.
Michael has not turned Gerard in to the police. He disapproves of the conduct but says that taking the matter to the authorities is something he cannot stomach, a reluctance he connects to the adventure stories of his childhood and his distaste for informing. Gerard’s exposure therefore does not end in a straightforward report or public reckoning within this encounter. The financial facts are established, while the consequences remain shaped by Michael’s refusal to involve the police.
Relationships and Ending
Gerard’s dealings with Mark connect his private financial arrangements to Sarah’s domestic life. Sarah fears that Gerard’s withdrawal would cost Mark his job and blames herself for having challenged him. She imagines being made to pay through Mark, then tries to retreat into the household routines of making sandwiches and cleaning. This is not proof that Gerard has deliberately targeted Mark; it shows how his power over business and Sarah’s sense of exposure make even an uncertain threat press on her marriage and everyday choices.
At the end of the meeting, Sarah apologizes to Gerard, then reminds him that Rufus tried to kill her. She explains that she and Michael are looking for a little girl and mean to find her. The appeal makes her purpose plain, but she does not ask Gerard to share it or claim that he has become trustworthy. She places a hand on his shoulder and kisses him on the cheek before leaving with Michael. Gerard does not say goodbye or touch his cheek. The restrained exchange closes on an unresolved relation: Sarah has accepted practical help from a man she suspects, while her final words insist on the danger she has survived and the child she still intends to find.


