Rider and Schafer
Five Days at MemorialThe partnership between Rider and Schafer develops through shared investigation, private grief, and an eventual difference in how they process defeat.
increasing
Bearing strength in each event
decreasing
A Working Partnership

A Working Partnership
Complementary Skills
Virginia Rider and Butch Schafer began working together on the hospital deaths. Rider followed evidence methodically, while Schafer brought decades of prosecutorial experience.
A Shared Case
They treated the investigation as a joint undertaking rather than a division between investigator and prosecutor. Their conversations and daily work built unusual trust.
A Case That Consumes Them

A Case That Consumes Them
Long Days
Rider and Schafer spent months reviewing records, interviewing witnesses, and returning to damaged Memorial. Their partnership became the place where each could discuss the entire case.
Personal Grief
Schafer was mourning his daughter while conducting interviews with bereaved families. The work sharpened his empathy but also forced him to guard against allowing grief to dictate the case.
A Warning Against Attachment

A Warning Against Attachment
Schafer’s Advice
Schafer warned Rider not to become emotionally involved. He knew that promising cases could fail and that legal outcomes rarely followed a neat moral narrative.
Rider’s Conviction
Rider continued to believe that a complete investigation could bring truth into public view. The warning became poignant as the case began encountering political and institutional resistance.
The No-Bill

The No-Bill
Two Responses
The grand jury’s refusal to indict devastated Rider. Schafer understood her disappointment but adopted a more resigned view of the case’s outcome.
Friendship Under Strain
Their different reactions did not erase their mutual respect. Rider’s departure from the unit changed a partnership that had become central to both their professional lives.
Work and Loss

Work and Loss
Rider Leaves
Rider pursued other work after losing faith in the investigation’s direction. She carried the case into her own thinking about advance directives and patient autonomy.
Schafer Remains
Schafer accepted that prosecution does not guarantee conviction. He continued to believe the investigation had been conducted honestly and that the victims’ stories mattered even without a trial.
September 2005
Late 2005
October 2005
July 24, 2007
After the grand jury decision