“Leave no living patients behind”
Five Days at Memorial“Leave no living patients behind” is the alleged directive Susan Mulderick gave during the Memorial Medical Center crisis. Recalled by coroner Frank Minyard while he reviewed the case, the phrase troubled him precisely because he could not determine what it meant: its stark wording carried an implication he could not comfortably resolve, while the evidence before him did not settle its meaning.
Wording and Attribution
Minyard identified the phrase as Mulderick’s alleged directive, not as an established explanation of what happened. Its force lies in the contrast between “living patients” and the instruction that none be left behind. The wording raises an urgent question about the patients’ fate, but Minyard acknowledged that he did not know what the directive meant; the phrase alone cannot establish a specific action or intention.
Minyard’s Response
The words disturbed Minyard. His response was sharpened by convictions he had formed as coroner: he had repeatedly seen death arrive unexpectedly, and believed that respecting life mattered most. Against that outlook, an instruction framed around leaving no living patients behind sounded ominous, yet remained unresolved. He remarked privately that the phrase would make a striking movie title—a reaction that registered its dramatic horror without answering the factual question it posed.
Unresolved Implications
Minyard had also heard that other Memorial doctors might have done what Anna Pou did. He could not bring himself to investigate those additional deaths and alleged perpetrators while he was already struggling through the case involving Pou. His hesitation leaves the directive suspended between accusation and ambiguity: a disturbing phrase under review, not a settled account of its meaning or reach.