Readify

Former Flint-Goodridge Hospital site in New Orleans

Five Days at Memorial

The Former Flint-Goodridge Hospital site in New Orleans is presented as both a place of refuge within a segregated medical system and a marker of that system’s limits. Flint-Goodridge Hospital was once the city’s only private hospital where Black patients could receive care and their doctors could pursue residency training. Decades later, the site became the setting for Jannie Burgess’s retirement housing, linking the history of unequal access to the life of a nurse who had worked for years in hospitals where she herself could not be treated.

A Place Apart in a Segregated Medical Landscape

Before the civil-rights era, Flint-Goodridge Hospital occupied a distinctive position in New Orleans: it was the only private hospital in the city where Black patients could receive care and Black physicians could pursue residency training. Its significance was therefore practical as well as symbolic. In a city where private hospitals could employ Black nurses while excluding them as patients, Flint-Goodridge offered a rare point of access for patients and a professional training ground for doctors.

That history throws the experience of Jannie Burgess into relief. She took up nursing to support her children and worked in New Orleans hospitals and nursing homes, but her light-brown skin shaped where she could receive care. Memorial had opened in 1926 as Southern Baptist Hospital, only a few months before Burgess was born; more than four decades passed before she could be a patient there. The distinction between caring for patients and being admitted as one exposes how racial exclusion could persist inside the same medical system that depended on Black workers.

Burgess and the Site’s Later Life

After retiring, Burgess moved into senior housing at Flint-Goodridge Apartments, located on the former hospital site. Her relocation brought her back to a place whose earlier purpose had been shaped by the barriers she had encountered throughout her working life. The account describes her as having endured poor treatment from patients by gritting her teeth, smiling, and continuing her work; in retirement, she also cared for an ailing brother at home.

The site’s transformation from hospital to senior housing gives it a layered history rather than a single function. It had once served people shut out of other private hospitals; later, its apartments became home to a retired nurse whose career had unfolded within that exclusionary landscape. The book uses Burgess’s presence there to place an individual life against the longer history of segregated care, without treating the site’s earlier role as a resolution of that history.

Historical Contrast and Narrative Significance

The former hospital site sharpens the contrast between access to care and the power to define who belongs in a hospital. Burgess could work in institutions that would not admit her as a patient, while Flint-Goodridge had provided a rare alternative for Black patients and physicians. Her later residence at its former grounds makes that history intimate: the location is not simply a reference to an earlier institution, but part of the geography through which her professional life and later vulnerability are understood.

That history also complicates the account of Burgess’s final hospitalization at Memorial. In 2005, she was among the intensive-care patients assigned last priority for evacuation because she had a Do Not Resuscitate order. The narrative identifies her as a Black nurse who had once cared for patients in hospitals where she could not receive treatment herself. Against the earlier history represented by Flint-Goodridge, the evacuation decision raises the stakes of how institutions classify patients and determine whose needs receive priority.

Related StoryFlow