University of Texas Medical Branch
Five Days at MemorialThe University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston was a large teaching hospital whose promise of care for patients unable to pay became harder to sustain as financial pressures changed who could receive treatment. It offered Anna Pou a place to teach and care for poor people, then confronted her with the limits of that mission: costly cancer treatment depended on resources that uninsured patients could not readily obtain.
Teaching Hospital and Public Mission
When Pou completed her training in 1997, she and her husband, Vince Panepinto, moved to Galveston after she accepted a position at the University of Texas Medical Branch. It was the island’s only large hospital, had existed for more than a century, and had trained about a quarter of all Texas-trained doctors. Like many teaching hospitals, it joined patient care to medical education: patients, often poor, received treatment regardless of their ability to pay, while developing physicians learned through clinical practice. The hospital also served people in prison. This combination suited Pou, who enjoyed teaching and was drawn to caring for poor patients, as her father had been.
The arrangement placed vulnerable patients at the center of both the hospital’s care and its educational work. Its importance was not simply that it trained future doctors, but that it provided a setting in which people with limited means could receive treatment. The same dependence on institutional resources that made this mission possible, however, made it susceptible to budget decisions.
Financial Screening and Rationed Care
The year after Pou was hired, the hospital began rationing care for patients who could not afford to pay. It faced an $80 million budget deficit and declining state support. Just over a quarter of its patients had no insurance, and many others had inadequate coverage. Patients were now financially screened and charged an entry fee before seeing a doctor. Those unable to pay, or already indebted to the hospital, could be turned away. Children and emergency patients were exceptions under the law; most other decisions fell to a committee of doctors and administrators.
The committee received $25,000 each month to allocate among patients who lacked means, deciding who would receive medication, surgery, or other treatment. The process made access to care a formal institutional choice rather than an automatic feature of the hospital’s teaching mission. In this respect, the book compares the committee’s decisions with the earlier charity-care judgments of Louis J. Bristow at Southern Baptist Hospital: in both settings, clinicians and administrators had to select which financially needy patients would receive limited assistance.
Pou’s Work and the Limits of Treatment
Pou’s specialty made the effects of rationing especially consequential. The complex head and neck cancer operations she had spent years learning to perform were expensive, and a patient’s recovery often required a team spanning more than half a dozen other disciplines, including radiation therapy and rehabilitation. Her own surgical skill could not substitute for that network of care. When patients lacked insurance, finding the resources to assemble the treatment their recovery required became difficult.
Pou voiced her frustration in calls with friends, often recounting difficult days in dramatic terms. Some colleagues and acquaintances considered her prone to exaggeration or too quick to blame others when a patient’s care went wrong. Her intensity also affected professional relationships: she was not always willing to step back while other specialists did their work, and some regarded her as controlling. Yet the same insistence on doing her best for patients made her a forceful advocate. She was promoted to director of the Division of Head and Neck Surgery in her department.
Her life in Galveston also showed how work dominated her priorities. Nearly two years after moving into her house, she invited colleagues over and discovered, after turning on the oven, that packing materials were still inside; the house filled with smoke. Despite a packed schedule, she also accepted a surgeon’s wife’s request to help with a Junior League mailing. Rather than use printed labels, Pou spent her spare time at night addressing the invitations by hand, following a New Orleans practice even after being reminded that she was in Texas. These episodes sit alongside her professional drive: domestic details and social obligations repeatedly gave way to the standards and habits she carried from home.
Departure and Return to New Orleans
The circumstances that had drawn Pou to Galveston eventually changed. Her father died, leaving her mother a widow in New Orleans, and the department chair who had mentored Pou stepped down. His successor, four years younger and trained in both medicine and research, was not close to her. The department appeared to be moving toward a stronger emphasis on research, while Pou’s central commitment was patient care. She decided to leave and considered offers from as far away as San Diego.
At national specialty meetings, Pou had developed a friendly relationship with Daniel W. Nuss, the head of otolaryngology at Louisiana State University. Nuss practiced at Memorial Medical Center and had built a program in tumors and reconstruction, the same area of work that interested Pou. The program also served patients at Charity Hospital, including prisoners and many people without health insurance. Nuss and Pou had both trained in Pittsburgh and grown up in New Orleans; he had asked her several times whether she would consider moving back. In April 2004, Pou accepted an offer to join the university faculty.
The transition linked her return to New Orleans with Memorial Medical Center as well as the university. The state university employed Pou and provided her liability insurance, while Memorial advanced the university more than $350,000 for her first-year salary and expenses, to be repaid from her future earnings as a surgeon. In return, she joined Memorial’s medical staff and took emergency-room call there without additional pay. For Memorial’s owner, Tenet Healthcare, the arrangement also made the hospital eligible for additional Medicare funds as a teaching hospital. Pou’s departure therefore closed one chapter of her career at the University of Texas Medical Branch while carrying forward the same combination of teaching, complex cancer care, and service to patients with limited resources into her New Orleans work.
