Readify

Bereavement

Here There Is No Why

Bereavement is a continuing condition in Judah Loeb’s life, not a grief that ends when a funeral is over. The deaths of Chaim Lerner and Mary Loeb alter how Judah cries, remembers, and speaks to Hannah; later losses reopen those histories rather than replacing them. At the novel’s conclusion, sorrow enters a new marriage through the ritual breaking of a glass, making remembrance part of joy rather than its opposite.

Grief Before and After Mary’s Death

Judah’s first adult tears come not at a death but after intimacy with Michal. The morning after their first intercourse, he holds her from behind and weeps, startled by the vulnerability the tears expose. His departure follows: Michal tells him that Yoav Lerner will arrive soon, declines to answer his declaration of love, and watches him dress. The scene gives grief an early form in the novel: an attachment can be precious and formative even when it cannot become a shared future. Judah remembers the exact date and time, details that acquire significance many years later, so that an apparently private farewell is preserved as a point of return.

For much of his adult life, Judah suppresses tears and believes he has few reasons to cry. Mary’s illness and death break through that restraint. In the later account he gives Hannah, he describes crying at films, television, school plays, and songs, with the difficulty not being how to weep but how to stop. Grief is therefore both a response to Mary and a change in Judah’s emotional life: what had been held back becomes involuntary and recurrent. When Hannah asks whether he is still sleeping with Michal, Judah closes his eyes and begins to weep in front of his daughter. He has to steady himself with three breaths and squeeze her hand three times before he can explain that Michal sometimes came to New York after Mary’s death. The disclosure places physical intimacy, bereavement, and a father’s effort to speak honestly in the same conversation, without making them interchangeable.

Chaim’s Death, Memory, and Guilt

Chaim’s death remains an unresolved loss partly because Judah’s account of it changes as new testimony comes to light. Twelve years after Chaim’s death, the publicly accepted story is that the Holocaust survivor was its slow-acting final victim. Judah has never told Mary anything that would cast doubt on the suicide verdict, although his own suspicions persist. When Mary raises Michal in conversation, Judah later understands that the subject has led her toward Chaim and suicide, a topic already on her mind. In bed that night, his fear for Mary mingles with memories of Michal and the Lerners; remembering Chaim’s prayer experiment, he repeats it and directs its fifth petition toward a cure and more time with Mary. That petition overwhelms his other wishes. The scene makes bereavement anticipatory as well as retrospective: before Mary is gone, the possibility of losing her already reorganizes Judah’s hopes.

Chaim’s widow, Zehava Lerner, refuses to treat the question of his suicide as self-explanatory. She says that the more urgent questions are why he did not die sooner and how he remained alive for so many years after the Holocaust. Her questions do not offer a definitive explanation; they redirect attention from a single final act toward the long endurance that preceded it. That reframing meets Judah’s own tendency to search for a cause, while leaving the wound open rather than resolving it into a neat answer.

The war supplies another strand of guilt around Chaim’s death. Yoav Lerner recounts firing two bursts at what he believed were armed Hezbollah fighters and discovering that the targets were two ten-year-old boys. His account connects the killing to his father’s recurring nightmare of becoming a Nazi colonel in the Israeli army and murdering Arab children. Yoav concludes that Chaim could not live with what his son had done and that his own act caused his father’s suicide. This is Yoav’s belief, not an independently established explanation of Chaim’s death. Its force lies in how bereavement becomes bound to moral self-accusation: a son experiences his father’s death as a judgment on an earlier action, while the novel preserves the difference between that conviction and certainty about Chaim’s motives.

Shared Loss and Its Delayed Returns

The novel makes grief relational rather than private. After reading Kamal’s message, Hannah’s tears continue even while her voice stays clear and analytical; when she puts her phone away, she sobs into Judah’s shoulder. Judah comforts her, having learned that crying alongside Hannah is not usually the way to help her. As he holds her, he wonders how many more times she will cry in his arms. Their different outward responses do not cancel one another: Hannah’s composed reading and later sobbing mark the moment when analysis gives way to feeling, while Judah’s role is to remain present.

Mary’s absence also reaches Hannah through what she never received. On a flight with Judah, Hannah acknowledges that she was five when Mary died and could not have read a suicide note even if one had been left. A tear escapes as she says this. Judah places his hand over hers, and the small gesture answers what explanation cannot restore: neither a note nor retrospective understanding could have made her old enough to meet her mother as an adult. The exchange lets Hannah name the limits of what she could have known while still registering the loss of what was withheld.

Chaim’s and Mary’s deaths continue to shape Judah’s choices years after the events themselves. After Charlie dies in a bombing, Michal writes to offer condolences, and Judah replies for the first time. Fifteen years later, Michal tells Judah and Hannah that Zehava has died and urges them to attend the funeral because she has something to tell Judah in person. He and Hannah travel to Jerusalem for three nights, arriving on the morning of the funeral at Mount Herzl Cemetery. The crowd includes hundreds, perhaps thousands, and Hannah translates the Hebrew eulogies for her father. These details show grief extending beyond the household into public commemoration, while the invitation from Michal draws Judah back into a past he had largely avoided. Her earlier farewells had held; the deaths of Charlie and Zehava create occasions for contact, mourning, and renewed disclosure.

Mourning Within a New Marriage

Judah’s later wedding to Liora does not erase Mary, Michal, Chaim, or Charlie. Under a marriage canopy made from four poles and Judah’s late father’s wedding tallit, Hannah leads the ceremony and reads from the ketubah. The contract promises care even in old age, a pledge made concrete by the couple’s stage of life. Judah and Liora exchange rings and share the sweet wine; then the ceremony turns to the breaking of a glass.

Hannah has explained that its shards symbolize a broken world and that breaking it admits sorrow into a moment of great joy. Judah’s thoughts move through the names of Mary, Michal, Yoav, Charlie, and Israel, and then return to Chaim. The list makes mourning cumulative: one loss does not displace another, and private bereavements sit beside the wider history attached to Israel. Before the ceremony, Judah has practiced the action at home by breaking three thin wine goblets, wedding presents from his first marriage. At the wedding, Hannah places the glass beneath his foot, covered by a handkerchief, and he smashes it. The action does not resolve grief; it gives grief a recognized place in a new commitment. Bereavement remains part of Judah’s life, but it no longer requires that life to be organized solely around the dead.