Readify

Jonathan Devlin

In the Woods

Jonathan Devlin is a father, husband, and chairman of the Move the Motorway campaign whose family life becomes entangled with the murder of his daughter Katy. Introduced while the police are bringing him the news of her death, he is already strained by the search for her; later, as allegations implicate his surviving daughter Rosalind, his account reveals a long-standing uncertainty that he had neither resolved nor brought to the police.

Identity and Family Background

Jonathan lives with his family on the Knocknaree estate, in a modest semi-detached house several streets from the archaeological site. When Cassie Maddox and Rob Ryan arrive to tell him that Katy is dead, he is about forty and has apparently returned from looking for her. His ordinary breakfast and the effort of resuming the search place the news within the intimate routine of a family home: the police arrive with knowledge that will divide his life into before and after.

He is married to Margaret Devlin and is the father of Katy, Rosalind, and Jessica. The older resident Pamela Fitzgerald remembers him as having once been a wayward young man. In her account, Margaret’s pregnancy prompted him to find a job and a house, and the couple married. Jonathan later recalls that they were both frightened when they learned Margaret was pregnant, and that he briefly raised the possibility of her going to England. He says he does not regret marrying her. The history makes his attachment to the family clear, while also giving weight to his later anguish about what he believes might have happened had he understood Rosalind’s nature earlier.

The Move the Motorway Campaign

Jonathan is not simply a grieving parent encountered by the investigation. He founded and chairs the Move the Motorway campaign, which opposes a planned road crossing the archaeological site. He argues that the site should be protected as a heritage site and objects that the government is proceeding without properly consulting local people. The campaign pickets government buildings, writes to politicians, and pursues legal challenges.

The effort brings Jonathan into contact with people across Knocknaree. He has personally asked residents, including members of the archaeological team, to join. The campaign is sufficiently active to seek injunctions and make repeated court appearances, although its prospects are poor. Sam O’Neill later learns from his uncle that hearings took place around the end of April, the beginning of June, and the middle of July; those dates correspond with the threatening calls Jonathan reports to the police. An injunction is eventually obtained, but Jonathan is warned that it is likely to be overturned on appeal.

The calls turn the campaign from a public dispute into a threat directed at Jonathan’s household. One caller tells him to stop opposing the motorway; a later call reaches Katy and warns her that the caller knows where the family lives. Jonathan recalls that the first call came late at night and the second, on 3 June at about half past one in the morning. He describes the caller’s voice as older-sounding, with a country accent he cannot place, and thinks the man may have been drunk. At first Jonathan assumes the call is a wrong number. He only connects it to the campaign after the second call, and he tells the detectives he had initially taken the threats as evidence that the campaign was having an effect.

Grief and the Search for Answers

When the detectives visit, Jonathan is focused on the threat calls and on the possibility that the motorway dispute is connected to Katy’s death. He asks the investigators to identify the caller and establish whether the threats had anything to do with the murder. His anger is directed outward, at whoever threatened his daughter, but his insistence also shows how the campaign has become the first explanation he can grasp in the immediate aftermath of her death.

Jessica briefly speaks during the family’s interview, saying that the caller had frightened Katy. When Cassie asks whether there was anyone else Katy feared, Jessica begins to withdraw and asks whether what is happening is real. Later, Rosalind tries to prompt Jessica to tell Rob about a man she saw talking to Katy. The police insist on hearing Jessica’s account directly rather than relying on Rosalind’s version, because a secondhand report would not be admissible as evidence. Jessica eventually says she saw a man speak with Katy on the road as they returned from the shop. When asked when it happened, she corrects the suggestion that Katy had gone away: Katy was killed. Her testimony establishes a possible encounter, but the exchange also shows how difficult it is for her to remain engaged with the questioning.

The investigation does not find a material basis for suspecting the Devlin household in the murder. A search of the house produces no bloodstains or relevant trace evidence, and the family’s financial records show modest means, little savings, and no unusual activity or insurance policy on Katy. Jonathan and Margaret do not call the police during the first week after Katy’s death to ask how the investigation is proceeding. Rob registers their silence as unsettling, though it does not establish what either parent knows or feels.

Suspicion, Allegations, and Silence

The later case against Rosalind brings Jonathan’s private doubts into view. Damien Donnelly tells the police that Rosalind had described serious abuse within the family and had presented Katy as a source of danger to her sisters. These are allegations reported by Damien, not established facts. The investigation finds no evidence to substantiate the accusations against Jonathan and finds significant contradictions, including the absence of medical records supporting the specific injuries Damien says Rosalind described.

After the trial, Rob speaks with Jonathan outside the courthouse. Jonathan distinguishes suspicion from knowledge: he says he had wondered whether Rosalind was involved, but he knew she could not have carried out the murder herself because she was with her cousins, and he knew nothing about Damien. He had known Rosalind all her life and had considered her capable of troubling behavior, but he had hoped that the threats came from a property developer. His uncertainty matters: his silence was not a concealed certainty about the murder, yet he acknowledges that he had doubts about his daughter long before the case exposed them.

Jonathan explains that he had once wanted Rosalind to see a psychologist because of what he regarded as her lying. Margaret reacted strongly and threatened to leave with the girls, and Jonathan says he lacked proof that would have allowed him to make a meaningful accusation. He had also believed that telling the police would accomplish little. Rob nevertheless sees the cost of that silence in the family’s accumulated damage. Jonathan’s answer does not erase the question of what he might have done; it gives his inaction a context of divided loyalty, insufficient evidence, and fear of losing his family.

Aftermath and Narrative Significance

The case leaves the family facing public suspicion as well as private grief. Jonathan says that bricks have been thrown through the windows and that someone has painted a misspelled accusation on the family car. Although the police find no evidence to substantiate the allegations against him, the accusation circulates among neighbors, illustrating how suspicion can outlast the investigation that produced it.

Jonathan decides to keep Rosalind at home under supervision and send her to counseling, as the judge has directed. He plans for her to attend Trinity in October to study music, but tells her that she will have to remain at home rather than live independently. Margaret continues to believe that Rosalind did nothing and that the police set her up, yet agrees to keep her at home for a while. Jonathan also plans for Jessica to live with his sister in Athlone, hoping to remove her from further harm. His arrangements are an attempt to protect one daughter while containing the risk he associates with another; they do not resolve the family’s divisions.

The campaign’s eventual failure supplies a public counterpart to this private aftermath. Move the Motorway delays construction through injunctions and legal challenges, and protesters calling themselves Knocknafree occupy the site for several more weeks. The motorway nevertheless proceeds along its planned route. Jonathan’s effort has mattered enough to delay the project, but not enough to stop it, leaving open whether he expected public opposition to prevail or simply felt obliged to try.

Jonathan’s significance lies in this unresolved combination of action and omission. He is capable of organizing a sustained public campaign, confronting threats, and making difficult decisions for his daughters; within the family, however, his uncertainty about Rosalind remains entangled with loyalty to her and to Margaret. His story does not make suspicion equivalent to knowledge or explain away his silence. Instead, it shows how a father can keep acting in the present while being unable to recover the certainty that might have changed the past.

Related StoryFlow