Statistics Korea
Kim Ji-young, Born 1982Statistics Korea appears in the novel’s documentary framework as a source for demographic evidence. Its citations link the story’s account of gendered family expectations to population-level information, while the narrative places statistical claims beside the specific choices and constraints faced by its characters.
Cited Demographic Sources
The novel’s references include a Statistics Korea source titled “Sex Ratio at Birth by Birth Order” and another titled “Statistical Indicators and Ratios in Demography.” These citations establish a connection between the agency and the book’s treatment of birth patterns and demographic change. Rather than presenting Statistics Korea as a participant in the events, the text invokes its materials to give demographic context to family experiences shaped by son preference.
Statistics Alongside Individual Experience
The agency’s documentary role belongs to a wider method in the novel: broad social patterns are set beside ordinary institutional and domestic routines. The account moves between demographic evidence and scenes in which gendered expectations are treated as customary, including the assumption that boys take precedence in school and family settings. Statistics Korea’s cited materials offer a population-level frame for such experiences, which the narrative renders through individual lives rather than reducing them to figures.
Scope of the Evidence
The novel also includes employment, pay, and childcare statistics, but the cited passages do not identify Statistics Korea as the source for all of those figures. Some are explicitly connected to other sources, including a job-search website survey and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development data. The distinction matters: Statistics Korea’s clearly identified contribution here is demographic documentation, while the book’s larger statistical argument draws on several sources.
Narrative Significance
Statistics Korea helps the novel connect intimate histories to measurable social patterns without making the numbers a substitute for lived experience. Its demographic citations provide an evidentiary counterpoint to scenes in which inequality is accepted as natural or routine. The result is a narrative that treats statistical information as context for recognizing structural patterns, while leaving the people affected by those patterns at the center of the account.