Stanford University
Les Choses humainesStanford University is both Alexandre Farel’s promised future and one of the clearest measures of the future he loses. He reaches it after an elite academic ascent, but his return to France and the legal case arising from his encounter with Mila Wizman prevent him from completing the path he had imagined. The university’s importance therefore shifts from credential and opportunity to an absent destination, before Alexandre turns the experience of isolation associated with his imprisonment into the public origin story for a company offering virtual intimacy.
Place in Alexandre’s education
Alexandre arrives at Stanford at twenty-one, after entering École polytechnique at nineteen in third place. His achievements form a conspicuously polished record: exceptional school results, admission to a highly selective science preparatory program, and acceptance to a university he regards as among the world’s best. Stanford is not merely another institution on that list; he has been living in California for six months, and its annual tuition of sixty thousand euros underscores the scale of the family’s investment in this stage of his education.
That record sits beside a less visible history of distress. During his first weeks at École polytechnique, Alexandre struggled with the school’s military instruction and discipline. After three weeks of training at the military camp of La Courtine, he attempted suicide and was hospitalized in a state of extreme exhaustion and distress. His parents protected him, and he believed the episode would remain unknown. His later success at Stanford thus does not erase the earlier crisis: the outward story of achievement and the concealed history of vulnerability coexist from the start.
Stanford also enters the narrative as a gateway to professional selection. While preparing for interviews for a Google position, Alexandre is conscious of the competition and the distinction between the many applicants and the few chosen. His education, connections, and ambition orient him toward a future in the United States, where professional achievement appears to be the next step in a life already organized around performance.
Return to France and the turning point
The immediate disruption comes during a visit to France. After a night out with Mila, Alexandre wakes in the family apartment, troubled by what he can remember and by his recollection of her distress. He tells himself that alcohol and drugs may have affected his behavior, but that explanation does not settle his anxiety. He takes a Xanax, books an earlier return to San Francisco for the following day, and tells his parents that he has an important interview at Google. Their lack of response deepens his sense of isolation, even as he presents his departure as a professional necessity.
That planned return does not restore the life Stanford represents. In the initial questioning, Alexandre identifies himself as a Stanford student who must get back to the United States and says he cannot miss his courses. At the same time, he understands that he is accused of rape. His academic urgency and the accusation occupy the same exchange: the future he wants to resume is already entangled with a case he cannot simply leave behind.
His family name makes the collision between private crisis and public identity explicit. Speaking to his young lawyer, Alexandre asks that the matter not be made public and explains that he is Jean Farel’s son and that his mother is the essayist Claire Farel. Stanford belongs to his own record of achievement, but the disclosures about his parents reveal that he is also entering a legal and media story shaped by their prominence.
The cost of the proceedings
Alexandre is initially placed under judicial supervision rather than held in custody. He has no criminal record, has family members able to house him, and is pursuing brilliant studies; the judge nevertheless bars him from approaching Mila or leaving France. The restriction makes the conflict concrete: he is formally at liberty, yet cannot return to the American university where his education and intended career are based. He gives up his Stanford studies and the possibility of building his career in the United States while the investigation continues.
The proceedings extend across two years, punctuated by sudden requests from his lawyer, letters from the investigating judge, police inquiries, psychiatric and psychological examinations, hearings, and a further confrontation with Mila. Months of apparent quiet do not end the case; instead, each new summons brings back the possibility of imprisonment. An effort by his lawyer, Maître Célérier, to have the charge reclassified as sexual assault fails after the civil party refuses, and the case proceeds to the assize court. A financial settlement is also explored but does not end the prosecution.
A later encounter with Mila near the Saint-Martin Canal changes Alexandre’s legal position. He approaches her unexpectedly; she screams and tries to get away, and he grabs her shoulders and shakes her. Passers-by call the police. His judicial supervision is revoked, and he is imprisoned at Fresnes. In the defense’s closing argument, the loss of Stanford is placed among the consequences of the case: Alexandre has not obtained his engineering degree and has been unable to settle in the United States to study as planned. The argument also describes the damage done by intense media attention, while the trial itself leaves the central events contested rather than offering a shared account of what happened.
Stanford as an unfinished future
The university’s significance lies partly in how plainly its absence can be measured. Alexandre had reached Stanford after years of academic distinction, and he had imagined it as the setting for further study and a professional life in the United States. The restrictions imposed during the investigation interrupt that trajectory before the degree is completed. In the defense’s account, he never receives the engineering diploma and cannot establish himself in the country where he hoped to continue his education.
The narrative does not present Stanford as proof that Alexandre is innocent or as an answer to Mila’s account. It is instead one strand in the contrast between his social advantages and his eventual exclusion from the future those advantages seemed to guarantee. His elite education contributes to the public image that the media and the courtroom scrutinize, while the lost opportunity becomes part of the defense’s claim that the proceedings and their publicity have damaged his life. Stanford is therefore both a real institution in his history and a symbol of a path interrupted, without resolving the different accounts of responsibility at the center of the case.
From prison experience to Loving
Years later, Alexandre appears as one of the founders of Loving, an emotional-AI company developed with a former Stanford engineer of Japanese origin. The company raises five million dollars and offers users customizable virtual companions for friendship or romance, promising connection without the risks or harms of ordinary relationships. At twenty-six, Alexandre presents himself to investors as an entrepreneur whose difficult personal experience led him to recognize what he needed.
In that presentation, he describes a romantic rupture, a loss of confidence in himself and in others, and a period of mistakes he regrets. He says the idea for Loving came to him during the weeks he spent in prison, when he felt alone, rejected, and unable to communicate with anyone; he does not tell the investors why he was imprisoned. The omission matters to the public story he constructs: Stanford appears not as a completed education but through the former university connection of his co-founder, while Alexandre’s own institutional future has been replaced by a commercial promise to make attachment feel safer and more controllable.
The name of Stanford thus marks two different positions in Alexandre’s life. It first stands for the demanding, expensive, carefully cultivated education he has earned and expects to continue. After the case, it is the future he cannot recover; later, it survives indirectly in the credentials of the collaborator who helps him build Loving. His new venture converts isolation into an argument for virtual companionship, but it does not restore the interrupted education or settle the disputed events that preceded his imprisonment.