Readify

Indian removal

Little House on the Prairie

Indian removal is the historical policy of the U.S. government that forms the invisible engine of the entire narrative. It is the reason the Ingalls family leaves their comfortable home in Wisconsin, the reason they are able to claim land in Indian Territory, and finally the reason they must abandon the little house they built with such hope. The concept is not presented as a distant historical fact but as a living, contradictory force that shapes every major decision the family makes, from Pa's initial dream of the West to the quiet, sorrowful morning they drive away forever.

The Dream of the West and the Logic of Displacement

The family's journey begins with a vision of empty land. Pa tells Ma that in the Western country "the land is flat and the grass grows thick and high," and that "animals run freely and there are no settlers. Only Indians live there." This framing is crucial: the presence of Indians is acknowledged, but they are presented not as the owners of the land but as part of the natural landscape, like the wild animals that Pa loves to see "looking at him in the forest and eating fruit from the trees." The possibility that the Indians might have a claim to the territory is never seriously entertained. Instead, Pa's desire to live in a country "where the animals lived without fear" is a desire for a world that is, in his imagination, empty of human competition. The family leaves Wisconsin because Pa believes there are "too many people" there, and the West offers the promise of solitude and abundance. This logic of displacement is the foundation of the entire enterprise: the Ingalls family moves west not to conquer but to find a place that feels like home, and in doing so they participate in a larger, impersonal process of removal that they themselves will eventually suffer.

Pa's Explanation: The Government and the Inevitability of Removal

The concept of Indian removal is made explicit in a conversation between Pa and Laura after the family has settled in their new home. When Pa returns from a trip and hears about Indians visiting the house, he reassures the family with the proverb "all's well that ends well," and adds, "soon all the Indians here will move west." Laura, curious and troubled, asks why they go west. Pa's answer is blunt and revealing: "When white settlers arrive in a place, the Indians have to move away from there." When Laura presses further, asking why, Pa explains, "The government makes them. Laura. That's why we're here. Lots of white people are going to come and live here. We came first to choose the best land." This speech is the ideological heart of the novel's treatment of removal. Pa presents the policy as a natural, inevitable process, a simple fact of life rather than a matter of justice or injustice. He does not express guilt or regret, but neither does he celebrate the policy. He simply states it as the way things are, and he includes his own family in the wave of white settlement that is pushing the Indians westward. Laura, sensing something troubling, asks, "But. Pa, I thought this was Indian Territory. Won't the Indians be angry if they have to-" but Pa cuts her off: "No more questions, Laura. It's time for bed." The conversation is closed, and the moral question is left unanswered, buried under the authority of the father and the demands of bedtime.

The Dream of Living Like Kings and the Threat of Removal

The family's hope for the future is expressed in Pa's repeated promise that they will "live like kings." After trading for a plough and seeds, Pa tells Ma, "when these seeds grow in this rich land of ours, we'll be living like kings!" The phrase becomes a refrain, a vision of self-sufficiency and prosperity that justifies the hardship of the journey and the labor of building a home. But this dream is immediately shadowed by the threat of removal. Pa reports that "people in Independence say the government is going to move the white settlers out of Indian Territory." Ma's response is anguished: "Oh. no! Not when we have done so much." The irony is profound: the Ingalls family has benefited from the removal of the Indians, but now they face the same fate themselves. Pa, however, refuses to believe the rumor. "The government has always let settlers keep the land," he says. "I think they'll make the Indians move west again." This faith in the government's favor is the foundation of the family's security, and it is precisely this faith that will be betrayed.

The Osage People: A Presence That Complicates the Narrative

The Indians who appear in the novel are not abstract figures but vivid, specific presences. Laura first sees them as "tall, thin, fierce-looking men" with "reddish-brown" skin, "black and shining" eyes, and "feathers on their heads." They walk directly into the house, and Laura feels cold and her legs tremble. Later, a single Indian man visits, sitting silently by the fire with Pa, wearing "trousers made of animal skins" and "moccasins covered with beads," with "beautiful eagle feathers in his hair" that do not move because he is so still. The encounter is marked by silence and a failed attempt at communication: Pa says "No speak," and the Indian leaves "without a sound." The Osage people are also seen in a great procession, riding past the house with their families. Laura watches the "little naked brown Indians, no bigger than Mary and Laura," riding with "their straight black hair" blowing in the wind and "their black eyes" shining with happiness, and she feels "a sudden wish to be a little Indian girl, to ride naked in the wind and the sun." This moment of identification is remarkable: Laura, the white settler child, envies the freedom of the Indian children. The Osage are not merely victims of removal; they are a people with their own culture, their own beauty, and their own claim to the land. Their presence complicates the simple narrative of progress and settlement, and it makes the policy of removal feel not like an abstraction but like a human tragedy.

The Betrayal and the Departure

The family's dream is shattered when the rumor proves true. Pa comes home with his face "very red and his eyes like blue fire," and Laura is frightened because she has never seen him look like that. He tells Ma, "Scott and Edwards say the government is sending soldiers to make the settlers leave Indian Territory." His anger is directed not at the Indians but at the government in Washington, which had "told us it was all right to build our houses here" and now wants them to go. "I won't stay here until the soldiers take me away like a criminal," Pa declares. "We're going now!" The decision is made in a moment of fury and pride, and the family packs the wagon the next morning. The plough, the symbol of their hope for a prosperous future, is the one thing they cannot take. As they drive away, Pa looks at the empty prairie and says, "It's a great country, Caroline. But there will be wild Indians and wolves here for many years." The statement is a strange mixture of admiration and warning, and it reveals the deep ambivalence at the heart of the family's experience. They have lost their home, but they have not lost their belief in the greatness of the country. Ma, looking sad, says gently, "A year gone. Charles." Pa answers with a smile, "What's a year? We have all the time in the world." The novel ends with Laura feeling "all excited inside," and with the narrator's reflection: "You never know what will happen next, nor where you will be tomorrow, when you are travelling in a covered wagon." The excitement is real, but so is the loss. The family's journey is a cycle of hope and displacement, and Indian removal is the force that sets the cycle in motion and, ultimately, brings it to an end.