Brighton
My PolicemanBrighton is the city Marion Taylor identifies as home: a lively, familiar place of cafés, abundant shops, and the always-bright, sometimes menacing Palace Pier. More than a backdrop, it is a social landscape whose public pleasures and private risks shape how Marion, Tom Burgess, and Patrick Hazlewood move through their lives. Its remembered sea views, formal streets, cultural institutions, and clandestine meeting places contrast with the quiet domestic order of Peacehaven, making the city both a source of belonging and a setting where privacy is difficult to secure.
A lifelong home and a point of contrast
Marion’s attachment to Brighton is clearest in her resistance to leaving it. When Tom decides that they should retire to Peacehaven, she measures the proposed move against the city she has known all her life: Brighton has cafés that are full, shops with more than anyone could imagine needing, and a pier that remains bright and open. The comparison is not simply between two addresses. Brighton represents variety, activity, and the familiar press of a lived-in city, while Peacehaven promises quiet, predictability, and distance from Tom’s former work. Marion does not welcome that exchange, even though the bungalow they eventually occupy offers a view of the sea.
The city’s importance also rests on particular views and streets rather than on a general image of seaside life. Patrick’s flat on Chichester Terrace gave him a daily prospect of the sea, the Volk’s railway, the Duke’s Mound gardens, and the breakwater, whose crest of white appeared on windy days. Marion remembers this outlook despite rarely visiting him. From the terraced house she shared with Tom on Islingword Street, by contrast, the view was of the neighbours’ windows and their reflections. The difference marks a quiet imbalance between Patrick’s open, changing prospect and the more enclosed domestic setting Marion and Tom had made their own.
Chichester Terrace itself is remembered as hushed and solid. Its glossy doors stand back from the pavement behind Doric columns and black-and-white tiled steps; brass knockers, white façades, straight railings, and clean windows give the street a composed formality. Marion describes it as grand but restrained, unlike the more assertive Sussex Square or Lewes Crescent. When Tom and Marion walk there together, the street’s stillness and ordered architecture become part of a turning moment in their relationship. Brighton’s landscape can hold both a public, recognizable city and the intimate emotional weight of a particular walk.
Cultural institutions and social codes
Marion’s first visit to Brighton Museum and Art Gallery comes just after she has become a teacher at St Luke’s Infants’ School. Looking back, she is astonished that she had never entered an art gallery before. The visit makes the museum a marker of her emerging cultural experience, but it does not initially feel welcoming or neutral to her. She compares its green tiles, mosaic floor, mahogany staircase, and cabinets of stuffed specimens to a butcher’s shop, and reads its quiet rooms as a man’s world in which women may visit without belonging behind the scenes.
Her own appearance intensifies that sense of being out of place. She arrives in a new lilac dress and kitten-heeled shoes on a frosty December day, while the other visitors wear brown serge or navy wool. The heels click across the mosaic and seem conspicuous in the dark, serious silence. The scene sets the museum’s formal cultural authority against Marion’s uncertainty about its codes: she is a new teacher entering a space she has not previously claimed as part of her life.
For Patrick, the museum is also a workplace and a point of connection. After meeting Marion and Tom there, he takes them to the Clock Tower Café, a familiar haunt he shares with Tom when he wants hearty, unpretentious food. Patrick deliberately chooses it rather than an elegant restaurant, believing Marion to be the sort of schoolteacher who expects silver cutlery and a tablecloth. His first impression of her is shaped by her heels and assured manner: he imagines that she wants to lead Tom toward a respectable future of domestic comforts and possible promotion. Yet he also recognizes that he is being unfair, and that gaining her trust could help him continue seeing Tom. The café thus becomes a meeting ground where the three-way relationship is negotiated through class assumptions, hospitality, and Patrick’s fear of losing his place in Tom’s life.
The city’s discreet geography
Brighton’s cosmopolitan appearance does not, in Patrick’s account, make it an easy place to remain anonymous. He recalls avoiding the Argyle Hotel for years after becoming a curator because a familiar face might see him near its entrance: Jackie Butters, Mr Houghton, or one of the women from the museum. He describes precautions for visiting bars associated with men like himself: go after dark and alone, avoid catching anyone’s eye, and stay away from places near home. His occasional nights in London with Charlie feel easier because anonymity is more attainable there. Brighton may look cosmopolitan, Patrick suggests, but it is still small enough for recognition to endanger discretion.
His return to the Argyle follows a rare feeling of optimism. He has arranged for Tom to visit his flat alone, and the prospect makes the bar seem full of possibility rather than loneliness. Even so, the journey is conducted carefully. On a wet, mild night, Patrick walks along the seafront past Palace Pier, crosses King’s Road to avoid the town centre, and turns into Middle Street with his head down. Near half past nine, he slips through the Argyle’s black door, signs in under a name he uses for such places, and puts away his wet umbrella. The route connects Brighton’s visible seafront to a concealed social world, while the assumed name makes clear that entering the city’s nightlife requires a managed identity.
Other Brighton interiors offer contrasting forms of privacy. At the Queen’s Park Tavern, Marion and Julia Harcourt sit in the snug on a bright afternoon, choosing a gloomy booth in a nearly empty room with heavy green curtains and dark panelling. The middle-aged men at the bar stare as the two women order; Marion finds that she does not care. Julia lights Marion’s cigarette, and they share a moment of conspiratorial ease. The pub’s shadowed enclosure allows a temporary release from the expectations that govern Marion’s public respectability, although the watching men remain part of the scene.
The Friends’ Meeting House presents another kind of gathering. Marion attends a local Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament meeting with Julia, expecting that she may not fit the dress conventions she associates with the Aldermaston march. Instead, she finds a room of fewer than thirty people, sunlight at high windows, tea set out at the back, and a banner identifying the Brighton campaign. A speaker stands before the gathered audience without a platform or pulpit, and the room falls silent as sunlight backlights him. Here Brighton is not only a place of private relationships and coded nightlife but also a city where people assemble around a shared political cause.
Brighton as memory and narrative space
The novel’s use of Brighton is shaped by memory and by contrasts between what can be shown publicly and what must be hidden. Marion’s account makes the city tactile through pavements, doorways, clothes, windows, and the changing sea. Patrick’s memories likewise give the city a double geography: the orderly museum and formal terraces coexist with bars approached after dark and visits arranged under assumed names. These are not separate cities, but different ways of navigating the same one, determined by work, class, gender, and the danger of being recognized.
Brighton also holds distinct stages of Marion’s life. It is the home she is reluctant to leave, the place where she begins teaching and first enters a museum, and the setting for encounters that reveal the competing claims on Tom Burgess. The city’s crowded cafés and shops suggest the abundance Marion values; its narrow social knowledge makes Patrick cautious. Against Peacehaven’s repetitive streets and quieter routine, Brighton remains animated but not wholly free. Its public openness can offer culture, company, and political fellowship, while its small-town intimacy sharpens the need for secrecy.


