Clare Kendry’s letters
Passing (Nella Larsen Edition)Clare Kendry’s letters are the means by which her attempts to recover a connection with Irene Redfield survive Irene’s resistance. Their material form makes each arrival feel intrusive, while their contents expose a sharp divide: Clare writes of longing and reunion; Irene reads those appeals through humiliation, resentment, and the danger surrounding Clare’s chosen life. The first letter is destroyed, but a later one revives the encounter it could not erase.
Form and Arrival
The later letter appears last in Irene’s morning mail, among correspondence that is ordinary and clearly addressed. Its long envelope, thin Italian paper, and almost illegible scrawl seem alien to the rest. It bears no return address, yet Irene recognizes Clare as its sender. The envelope is postmarked in New York the day before, placing Clare in the city and making the letter’s arrival an immediate pressure on Irene’s decision whether to read it.
The letter also recalls an earlier one, received about two years before and similar in outward appearance: furtive, but in Irene’s recollection also faintly flaunting, with purple ink and foreign paper of extraordinary size. Such details give Clare’s correspondence a distinctive presence before its language is considered. The letters announce themselves as both secretive and conspicuous, much like Irene’s understanding of Clare, who repeatedly approaches danger without retreating from it.
The Chicago Letter
The earlier letter reaches Irene the morning after Clare has insisted on seeing her, on the day Irene is leaving for New York. Irene initially tells herself she will not open it; she is tired after a wretched night and does not want to revisit the previous afternoon. During the journey east, however, curiosity overcomes that resolve. Clare thanks her for visiting, acknowledges that she should not have insisted under the circumstances, and says how happy she was to meet Irene and how much she wanted to see her again—and to see their other friends, whom she could not meet.
Clare’s note does not reconcile them. Irene regards its flattering acknowledgment of her wisdom as powerless against the humiliation of the visit. With unusual methodicalness, she tears the letter into tiny ragged squares on her black crêpe de Chine lap, gathers them, and drops them over the train railing. She watches the pieces scatter across the tracks, cinders, grass, and dirty water. The deliberate destruction turns a private refusal into a physical act: Irene tells herself that the matter is finished and imagines that, even if she sees Clare again, she can refuse to recognize her.
The Later Appeal
About two years later, Irene opens the new letter despite her reluctance. Its plea is more expansive than the earlier note. Clare writes that she is lonely and longs to be with Irene again; she describes her present existence as pale beside the life she once thought herself glad to leave. She calls that longing an unceasing ache and partly blames Irene for it, because seeing her in Chicago rekindled the desire.
Irene’s reaction is divided. The letter’s extravagance and unreserved expression renew her suspicion that Clare is acting, though Irene allows that Clare may not be fully conscious of it. She also sees the appeal as selfish: Clare chose to leave her former life, Irene reasons, and cannot fairly expect others to bear the cost of that choice. The letter’s wording therefore does not settle what Clare’s longing means. It gives Irene evidence of a desire, but Irene reads that evidence through mistrust rather than accepting it at face value.
Memory, Obligation, and Concealment
The later letter makes the past present again. As Irene sits in her room in October sunlight holding it, she is surprised not simply by her anger but by the fear and panic that remain attached to the earlier encounter. Clare’s reference to Chicago singles out the meeting that Irene associates with John Bellew’s racist words and manner. The letter thus does more than request another meeting: it reopens the circumstances in which Irene concealed her own origin and did not challenge Bellew’s assertions, because she feared that defending Black people might expose her identity and reveal Clare’s.
That response complicates Irene’s stated refusal to sympathize with Clare’s yearning for her own people. Irene recognizes a duty to Clare grounded in racial ties, even as she resents Clare for bringing her into danger and distrusts her self-presentation. The letters hold these opposed judgments together without resolving them. Clare’s voice reaches Irene through written appeals, but the reader receives those appeals inside Irene’s memories and interpretations; the correspondence therefore reveals both Clare’s effort to reconnect and the limits of what Irene is willing—or able—to hear.


