Darryl McGaffen
Presumed InnocentDarryl McGaffen is a mild-mannered banker whose defense of his wife, Colleen, becomes a central obstacle in the prosecution’s case against her for abusing their son, Wendell. He presents the boy’s injuries as the result of an accident he witnessed and portrays Colleen as a devoted mother; at trial, his anguished account turns the family’s ordeal into an appeal for sympathy. The prosecution’s decision to call Wendell in rebuttal exposes the limits of that appeal and makes Darryl’s testimony one of the case’s defining contests over whose account the jury will believe.
Background and Family
Darryl works for his brother Joey, a conspicuous gangster, at a bank in McCrary. Joey uses the bank to launder large amounts of criminal money, while Darryl keeps the accounts and avoids his brother’s flamboyant public style. The contrast between them is part of the narrator’s initial description: Joey attracts attention, while Darryl appears to be an ordinary man trying to do his work without becoming the story.
The family has already endured the death of a young daughter, who died at three after falling from a terrace at the family home. Joey later testified before a grand jury that the child’s death weighed heavily on him and clouded his judgment in a separate matter involving bonds delivered to the bank. The detail places Darryl’s later crisis within a family history of loss, although the account does not establish how he himself understood that earlier tragedy.
Darryl and Colleen have another child, Wendell. When the boy is five, Colleen brings him to hospital unconscious after a serious fall. The medical examination raises suspicion that his injuries were not accidental, and the authorities investigate the home. The evidence against Colleen includes medical findings and material recovered during a search. Darryl rejects the accusation that his wife harmed their son, insisting that the family has become the target of a wrongful intervention.
Public Defense of Colleen
As the case grows prominent, Darryl supports Colleen openly. He describes her as a loving, devoted mother and says that Wendell’s injuries came from a terrible accident he witnessed. In his account, the family’s distress is compounded by doctors and lawyers conspiring to take their sick child away. This is a position he advances in the face of the medical evidence, not a conclusion the narration confirms as true.
The dispute takes place amid intense public attention. Joey ensures that cameras are present when Darryl arrives at the courthouse, and Darryl’s accusation that Raymond Horgan is pursuing a vendetta against the family becomes part of the public framing of the case. Horgan initially intends to try the matter himself, then returns it to Carolyn Polhemus as the campaign season intensifies and recommends that she work with a senior deputy. Rusty Sabich joins her. Darryl is thus more than a witness in a private family crisis: his defense of Colleen is drawn into a highly visible confrontation involving the prosecuting office and Horgan’s political standing.
Testimony and the Trial
At trial, the prosecution presents physical evidence, doctors’ testimony, and their test results before resting its case. Alejandro Stern, representing Colleen, takes a restrained approach. He calls a psychiatrist to describe her gentle nature, then reverses the usual order of the defense presentation: Colleen testifies first, denying the allegations, and Darryl follows.
Darryl’s testimony is emotional. He weeps as he recounts the death of his first child and insists that he witnessed Wendell’s fall. Rusty, who is prosecuting the case with Carolyn, regards Darryl’s inability to cope with the family’s circumstances as genuinely moving. The difficulty for the prosecution is that the jury can sympathize with a father trying to preserve what remains of his family even while questioning his account. Stern’s presentation gives that sympathy a further purpose: the jury is invited to take Darryl’s forgiveness of his wife as a reason to forgive her too.
The prosecution’s answer is to call Wendell in rebuttal. Rusty later describes the boy’s testimony as the only effective response to his father’s account. Carolyn stands beside Wendell in the witness box as the courtroom falls silent. The contrast is stark: Darryl’s testimony asks the jury to accept a parent’s account of an accident and to honor the family’s bond; Wendell’s appearance supplies the prosecution’s response from the child at the center of the case.
Narrative Role and Significance
Darryl’s role in the trial is not simply to provide an alternative factual account. His testimony makes family loyalty a competing form of evidence. The prosecution has doctors, tests, and material recovered in the investigation; the defense places before the jury a husband who grieves openly and insists that his wife is loving. The emotional force of his account complicates the courtroom task without resolving the factual dispute on its own.
His presence also shows how a case can become entangled with public and political performance. Joey helps bring cameras to the courthouse, while the claim of a vendetta gives the family’s defense a larger audience. Inside the courtroom, Stern turns Darryl’s sorrow and forgiveness into a deliberate appeal to the jury. Against that appeal, Carolyn and Rusty rely on Wendell’s testimony. Darryl therefore stands at the intersection of the case’s intimate stakes and its public spectacle: a father trying to defend his family, whose testimony is powerful precisely because it can be both moving and contested.
