The way of it
SCOTTISH ROMANCE: My Sinful Surrender to a Highlander Werewolf (Scottish Werewolf Pregnancy Romance) (Historical Medieval Shape Shifter Paranormal Science Fiction Short Stories)“The way of it” is a fatalistic expression whose force in the narrative comes from treating social custom as unavoidable reality. Spoken by the highlander while Freya is held captive, it reduces a violent transaction to the language of ordinary necessity, while Freya’s refusal exposes the phrase as an excuse for power rather than a neutral description of how life must be.
Meaning and Immediate Context
The expression first acquires its full menace after the highlander tells Freya that she will remain with him until morning and then places her in a small thatched house. When she asks what will happen next, he answers that she will be sold to the highest bidder and slams the door. The phrase therefore belongs to a world in which a captured woman can be treated as property, with the sale presented as the expected continuation of her captivity rather than as an extraordinary crime.
Repetition as Social Justification
When Freya protests that she will not be bought and sold like meat and insists that she is a married woman, the highlander answers, “It is the way of it.” His short reply does not address her marriage, her consent, or the injustice of the proposed sale. Instead, it shifts the argument from morality to custom: because the practice exists, he implies that it needs no defense. The expression functions as a verbal closure, ending inquiry by making the existing order sound self-evident.
Freya immediately rejects that closure. She answers, “No, it is not the way of it,” and defines the true obligation as a marriage recognized by the Lord, one that neither the highlander nor anyone else should disregard for a few coins. The contrast places the two speakers in conflict over who has the authority to define reality. For the highlander, “the way of it” means the established practice of captivity and sale; for Freya, it cannot mean anything that violates marriage, agency, and moral law.
The Phrase in Captivity
The highlander repeats the expression after Freya asks what alternative remains to her. She fears that, as a married woman, she will be condemned if another man takes her, yet if she is sold she will become another man’s woman. The highlander challenges whether God would damn her for a choice she cannot control, but when Freya returns his bread and insists that her God would not do so, he again says, “It is the way of it.” The repetition shows that the phrase is not an argument reached through reflection; it is a reflexive formula that survives even when the moral contradiction has been plainly stated.
Its placement beside the bread intensifies the contradiction. The highlander tears a round of bread in two, pushes one piece toward Freya, and tells her to eat, while accepting the larger structure of coercion surrounding them. Freya refuses and says she would rather starve. Material sustenance and moral submission become linked: accepting the bread might mean accepting the conditions he declares inevitable, whereas refusing it preserves her immediate act of resistance.
Narrative and Thematic Significance
“The way of it” gives the scene its central ideological conflict. The highlander is not shown merely announcing a personal desire; he speaks as an agent of a custom that turns a person into a commodity and then hides behind tradition. His shrug and repeated wording make the injustice appear banal, which is precisely what gives the expression its power. It converts a choice made by people into an impersonal rule, allowing those who enforce it to deny responsibility.
Freya’s counterstatement transforms the phrase into a contested object. She does not simply reject the highlander’s plan; she rejects his claim that custom determines what is permissible. Her anger draws together her captivity, her abusive marriage, the threat of being sold, and the religious fear attached to becoming another man’s partner. Against the fatalism of “the way of it,” she asserts that a social practice can be judged and resisted. The expression thus marks the point where oppressive common sense meets explicit refusal, making language itself part of Freya’s struggle for control.