Conan
Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Genre and Rating GuideConan is presented in the guide as a durable heroic figure whose identity anchors a substantial cluster of sword-and-sorcery fiction. The listings connect him with stories of rebellion, kingship, barbarism, and swordplay, while the guide’s classification system places these works within its broader map of fantasy, science fiction, supernatural fantasy, superhero fiction, and related genres.
Identity and Literary Domain
Conan’s defining place in the catalogue is as a protagonist of sword-and-sorcery fiction. The guide explicitly distinguishes “SO” as “Sorcery Fantasy,” and Conan titles repeatedly carry that code, establishing the character’s primary generic home. The adjacent classification vocabulary also includes “SW,” meaning “Swords,” so Conan’s identity is associated not merely with fantastic settings but with a specifically martial form of fantasy in which swordsmanship is a central narrative instrument.
The character’s catalogue identity is not confined to one title or one authorial version. The guide lists Conan the Rebel by Poul Anderson, Conan of Aquilonia by L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter, Conan the Barbarian by L. Sprague de Camp, and Conan the Swordsman by L. Sprague de Camp. Taken together, these entries show Conan functioning as a continuing literary character whose adventures can be reframed through different historical, political, and heroic emphases.
Titles and Narrative Possibilities
The title Conan the Barbarian foregrounds the character’s foundational image: a hero defined by distance from conventional civilization and by a direct, forceful mode of action. Conan the Swordsman narrows that emphasis toward martial expertise, making the weapon and the warrior’s practiced skill central to the character’s presentation. The two titles therefore suggest complementary aspects of the same figure: the outsider whose identity is marked by barbarism and the combatant whose authority is expressed through the sword.
Other titles expand Conan beyond a simple image of wandering violence. Conan of Aquilonia places him in relation to a named realm, implying a political or territorial dimension, while Conan the Rebel frames him through opposition to established power. Conan the Rebel and Conan of Aquilonia consequently create a productive contrast: one title emphasizes resistance, the other attachment to a political world. The catalogue supports a Conan who can move between the margins of civilization and its centers without losing the force of his defining identity.
Authors and Continuity
Poul Anderson’s Conan the Rebel appears alongside several other works by Anderson, including Cold Victory, The Corkscrew of Space, and The Corridors of Time. Its placement among Anderson’s entries demonstrates that Conan’s world can be taken up by an author otherwise represented in science-fiction listings as well as fantasy ones. The character thus participates in a wider tradition of genre writing rather than belonging to an isolated bibliographic corner.
L. Sprague de Camp is associated with multiple Conan titles in the guide. Conan of Aquilonia is credited to de Camp and Lin Carter, whereas Conan the Barbarian and Conan the Swordsman are listed under de Camp alone. This distribution records both individual and collaborative forms of continuation. It also shows how Conan’s identity persists across changing authorial arrangements: the character remains recognizable while the credited hands, titles, and narrative emphases vary.
Genre Classification and Significance
The guide gives Conan titles different subcodes and ratings: Conan the Rebel is marked SO-N-3.5, Conan of Aquilonia SO-C-3.0, Conan the Barbarian SO-N-2.5, and Conan the Swordsman SO-C-3.5. The evidence does not define every second-position code, but it does establish that the catalogue differentiates works within the same broad sorcery-fantasy field rather than treating all Conan fiction as identical. The ratings likewise register variation among individual books while preserving the character’s central generic affiliation.
Conan’s significance in this record lies in his adaptability. He can be presented as barbarian, swordsman, rebel, or figure connected with Aquilonia; he can appear in works by Poul Anderson, L. Sprague de Camp, or the de Camp–Lin Carter collaboration; and his books can occupy several positions within the guide’s internal classification system. The result is a character defined less by one fixed episode than by a recurring narrative capacity: Conan carries the sword-and-sorcery mode across different authors and across different versions of heroic action.
