From Weinstein’s Leave to Institutional Collapse
She SaidThis flow tracks how the first public report triggered a rapid crisis for Weinstein and the company that had long protected him.
increasing
Bearing strength in each event
decreasing
A Leave of Absence Announced

A Leave of Absence Announced
A statement arrives
As the reporters prepared to publish, Weinstein said he would take leave from The Weinstein Company to focus on personal issues. He also issued a rambling statement mixing contrition with denial.
A signal of crisis
The leave suggested that the findings had immediate consequences even before the public response fully developed. The company now had to decide whether Weinstein could continue to lead.
An Emergency Board Meeting

An Emergency Board Meeting
The board reacts
The company’s board convened after publication. Bob Weinstein and others urged Harvey to follow through with leave and treatment, while Harvey resisted and threatened to sell the company.
Competing priorities
Some directors focused on protecting the company and separating it from responsibility for older conduct. Their discussion revealed how liability concerns continued to outweigh attention to the women.
A Unified Front Fails

A Unified Front Fails
Board members divide
Directors disagreed over whether to protect Weinstein, remove him, or distance the company. The prior strategy of minimizing and containing complaints could no longer hold after public exposure.
A brother breaks away
Bob Weinstein told Harvey that he was finished. His confrontation marked a late rupture in their partnership, after years in which he had failed to use his influence decisively.
Defenders Depart

Defenders Depart
Public relations alliance collapses
Lisa Bloom and Lanny Davis left Weinstein’s team amid criticism. Bloom’s earlier work to manage reputation and undermine accusers became a public controversy of its own.
A narrative turns against itself
The planned image of Weinstein as a man learning from a women’s rights advocate failed. The people hired to protect him became part of the story about the machinery of concealment.
A Company Cannot Recover

A Company Cannot Recover
Financial and reputational damage
The company faced a crisis after the allegations became public. Board members resigned, and the business could not separate itself from the leader whose conduct it had failed to address.
A warning about complicity
The company’s collapse showed that protecting a powerful executive did not ultimately protect the institution. Its own efforts to contain risk had allowed the risk to grow.
October 5, 2017
October 5, 2017
October 2017
October 2017
Late 2017 to 2018