The persistent love of an ugly woman
The metaphor of 'the persistent love of an ugly woman' is a central rhetorical device employed by Inoue, the Lord of Chikugo, to frame the Christian mission in Japan as an unwelcome and oppressive imposition. It encapsulates the novel's core conflict between a foreign faith and a resistant culture, portraying the missionary effort not as a noble endeavor but as a suffocating, unwanted attachment that the object of its affection—Japan—must finally cast off.
Origin and First Use in the Argument
Inoue first deploys the metaphor during his second meeting with Sebastian Rodrigues, after the priest has been imprisoned. The magistrate, having just spoken of the historical quarrels among European nations in Japan, compares the country to a man named Takenobu Matsuura of Hirado, who expelled his four quarreling concubines. Inoue then directly applies the analogy to Christianity: 'Father, don't you think it is better for this man called Japan to stop thinking about women from foreign countries and to be united with a woman born in the same country, a woman who has sympathy for his way of thinking.' When Rodrigues counters that the Church's nationality is irrelevant, Inoue refines his metaphor, stating that 'the persistent affection of an ugly woman is an intolerable burden for a man.' He thus casts the missionaries as an ugly, persistent woman whose love is not only unwanted but actively burdensome, and Japan as the man who must free himself from this oppressive attachment.
The Metaphor's Thematic Expansion
Inoue later expands the metaphor into a broader critique of the mission's fruitlessness. He tells Rodrigues to consider two things: 'the persistent affection of an ugly woman is an intolerable burden for a man' and 'a barren woman should not become a wife.' The second part of the analogy—barrenness—directly attacks the mission's claim to spiritual fecundity, suggesting that Christianity has failed to produce genuine, lasting converts in Japan and is therefore unfit to be the country's spiritual partner. This framing transforms the missionary project from a tragic failure into a fundamentally misguided and even repulsive relationship. The interpreter later echoes this sentiment, accusing Rodrigues and Garrpe of causing the deaths of Japanese peasants because of their 'selfish dream,' a dream that Inoue's metaphor has already characterized as an ugly, barren, and insufferable love.
The Swamp and the Persistent Love
The metaphor of the persistent love of an ugly woman is intimately connected to the novel's other central image: Japan as a 'swamp' that rots the roots of Christianity. Inoue tells Rodrigues, 'Father, you were not defeated by me. You were defeated by this swamp of Japan.' The swamp is the passive, absorptive, and transformative environment that makes the foreign faith unsustainable. The persistent love of an ugly woman, by contrast, is the active, aggressive, and unwanted force that the swamp—or the man Japan—must reject. Together, the two images form a complementary diagnosis: the swamp explains why Christianity cannot take root, while the persistent love explains why its continued presence is experienced as an intolerable imposition. The metaphor thus serves as Inoue's final, cynical verdict on the entire missionary enterprise, reducing its spiritual aspirations to the level of a grotesque and unwelcome courtship.
Narrative Significance and Rodrigues' Internal Echo
The metaphor haunts Rodrigues after his apostasy. As he reflects on the interpreter's accusation that the missionaries' 'selfish dream' has caused the bloodshed, he recalls Inoue's words: 'The Lord of Chikugo had compared this selfish dream to the excessive love of an ugly woman.' The metaphor becomes a weapon of self-doubt, forcing Rodrigues to question whether his mission was ever a genuine act of love or merely a stubborn, self-serving imposition on a people who did not want it. The persistent love of an ugly woman thus functions as the narrative's most potent articulation of the Japanese authorities' perspective, a perspective that Rodrigues, in his moments of despair, cannot fully dismiss. It stands as a permanent challenge to the very idea of a universal, transcendent truth that can be forcibly planted in alien soil.