Hank Devereaux and Tony Coniglia’s Racquetball-and-Talk Friendship
Straight ManWilliam Henry Devereaux, Jr. and Tony Coniglia’s friendship takes shape through ritualized competition and talk that can move from teasing to consequential professional questions. Their racquetball games make the bond visible in a comic imbalance: Tony’s heart condition limits his movement, so Hank must play according to rules that let Tony compete. Yet the friendship is not merely a private routine. When Tony agrees to chair an internal review of the English Department, he insists that he and Hank are not friends, turning their closeness into the very complication the review must confront.
A Friendship Built on the Court
Hank and Tony play racquetball twice a week. Tony is fifty-eight, compactly built, and powerful on the serve; he can send the ball low and hard to either side, while disguising whether he will pass, dink, or kill it. The game gives him room to compete through precision and unpredictability, even though his movement is restricted. His play is designed not just to score but to make Hank look foolish, a pleasure Tony takes openly.
The rules that permit Tony to play also reverse the ordinary balance between athletic ability and advantage. With heart trouble recurring over five years and his doctor limiting him to mild exercise, Tony allows himself no more than one step from the center of the court. Hank must return the ball within that radius; otherwise Tony calls it unplayable and takes the point. Hank may hit directly in front of Tony, but cannot use angles, despite angles being central to racquetball. The handicap is so severe that Tony gives Hank six to eight points in a game, and Hank still seldom wins. Tony’s physical limit thus becomes the organizing rule of their shared recreation: the contest is real, but its fairness depends on rules they both know are tilted.
Tony’s competitiveness persists within that arrangement. When he is ahead, he turns toward Hank with knitted brows and urges him to try harder, as though the handicap has slipped from view. His deadpan insistence may be deliberate irony or genuine absorption in the contest; Hank cannot be sure. The uncertainty belongs to their friendship’s humor: Tony can make a joke sound like a serious demand, while Hank recognizes the performance without claiming to know exactly where the joke ends.
Wagers and Their Private Humor
Competition extends beyond the court. Tony would like to wager money on their games, but Hank declines because he cannot reliably tell who has won a point until Tony tells him. Instead, Tony devises other bets, including a season-long wager about the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. His sister lives in Tampa, and he follows the team; in one proposed bet, Tony would take the Buccaneers against a team of Hank’s choosing, with twenty dollars at stake and the season’s best record deciding the winner. The wager shows how Tony turns ordinary loyalties into elaborate contests, while Hank’s account of it preserves the pair’s familiar difference: Tony sets the terms, and Hank finds the arrangement difficult to follow.
Their joking can also touch on the boundaries of friendship itself. After Tony says he has been asked to lead the English Department’s internal review, he explains that Jacob Rose questioned whether he could be objective because he and Hank are friends. Tony says he assured Jacob that he could be objective by denying that he considered Hank a friend and claiming they had never been friends. Hank hears the joke in the denial and grins; he knows Jacob would not take the claim at face value. Their closeness is therefore acknowledged indirectly, through the very line that refuses to acknowledge it.
Work, Loyalty, and Departmental Strain
Tony’s review assignment gives the friendship an institutional consequence. He is not simply joking with Hank about their relationship: he has agreed to chair a review of the English Department, where grievances are already multiplying. He identifies fifteen pending grievances against Hank, the dean, and the campus executive officer—more than the grievances of all other faculty combined. Tony regards this conflict as evidence that the department’s members cannot get along, and he sees a danger that the university may respond by replacing older faculty with younger scholars at lower salaries.
Hank answers from a different angle. He suggests that the grievances, however disruptive, may be the only sign of life from colleagues who have been inactive for years. Their disagreement is not a rupture between friends so much as a difference in what they see in the same evidence: Tony reads the grievances as a threat to the department’s survival, while Hank also sees them as proof that its members remain engaged. The exchange places private banter beside institutional vulnerability. The department’s conflicts could make the friendship harder to navigate, but their conversation remains candid enough to hold competing interpretations without reducing either man to an opponent.
Tony’s denial of friendship is especially pointed because he accepts a role that requires him to assess matters involving Hank. The joke acknowledges the appearance of partiality even as Tony claims he can set it aside. The evidence does not establish how the review proceeds or what conclusion Tony reaches; what it does show is that the friendship is tested at the level of professional trust before any outcome is known.
Conversation Beyond the Game
The relationship also extends into shared time away from the court. After playing, Hank and Tony dress and continue talking; Tony discusses his personal life and his decision to take on the internal review. Their conversation moves easily between teasing, work, and more private subjects, a range that makes their closeness apparent without requiring either man to name it plainly.
In another social setting, Tony’s attention turns to Missy Blaylock when he orders raw clams and demonstrates how he prefers them eaten. He insists on showing her his method, and she responds with interest. The scene presents Tony as a confident performer among companions, while Hank remains part of the group’s company rather than the focus of Tony’s attention. Later, Hank, Tony, and Missy travel together in the front seat of Tony’s Nissan Stanza, an awkward arrangement for three that leaves little room for discreet affection between the other two. Hank treats the situation with comic detachment. These moments broaden the friendship beyond their regular match: Hank accompanies Tony through social occasions, observes his manner with others, and remains present even when Tony’s attention is elsewhere.
The friendship’s defining pattern is thus not solemn declaration but repeated contact: twice-weekly games, eccentric wagers, frank talk, and the willingness to enter a professional situation complicated by personal ties. Tony and Hank can compete under rules that make victory lopsided, argue over what departmental grievances mean, and joke that they are not friends. The denial carries its own proof. Their bond is legible in how readily they keep showing up to play, talk, and take one another seriously beneath the teasing.