Readify

Achille Lauro hijacking

The Andy Warhol Diaries

The Achille Lauro hijacking appears in Andy Warhol’s diary as a news event whose significance shifts quickly from television coincidence to political anxiety. His entries of October 9 and 10, 1985, register not a detailed account of the seizure but the way it entered daily conversation, unsettled his sense of what might follow, and changed the tone of his writing.

News and the television coincidence

On October 9, Warhol wrote that the news was dominated by the Achille Lauro seajacking in Egypt. He expected the story might lead more people to watch The Love Boat that week, since an episode featuring him was due to air. People were already telling him they planned to tune in. The connection was an accidental overlap between a crisis in the news and his own television exposure: the same event that commanded public attention might also direct viewers toward his episode.

Distrust and apprehension

By the following day, the entry had turned sharply. Warhol described the governments involved as lying about the hijacking and imagined a furious response on behalf of the Klinghoffer family. This was a hypothetical expression of anger, not a report of any action taken. He then set that imagined response against his recent distress after killing a cockroach, distinguishing his sensitivity to the insect from his reaction to those he associated with the hijacking.

The diary’s alarm widened into anticipation of war. Warhol proposed stockpiling silk stockings and candy bars, an abrupt, practical inventory that gives his fear a domestic scale. The entry does not establish that war followed; it records his apprehension in the immediate aftermath of the news.

A crisis in the diary’s everyday register

The two entries place the hijacking beside ordinary concerns: a television appearance, viewers’ plans, and the small preparations Warhol imagined making. That juxtaposition captures how a major news story could move through his diary without displacing its daily register, while still changing its mood. The television coincidence first makes the event part of celebrity conversation; the next day, suspicion and war anxiety take over.