John Travolta
The Andy Warhol DiariesJohn Travolta enters these diary scenes as a star whose appeal is intensely physical and whose presence reorganizes the room around him. At the Houston premiere of Urban Cowboy, the diarist’s close attention to Travolta’s appearance sits beside an account of the fans, photographers, and crowds drawn to him. The contrast is central to the portrait: Travolta is observed both as an attractive individual and as a public figure whose fame becomes an event in itself.
The Houston premiere
The first detailed encounter comes at a dinner at Lynn Wyatt’s home, held for Diane von Furstenberg and Barry Diller. Travolta arrived with thirty people after Wyatt had declined to accommodate that many additional dinner guests. He wore a black silk shirt, a bright green linen jacket, and black pants; the diarist singled out his blue eyes and noted the bodyguards accompanying him. He was also with Jim Bridges, director of Urban Cowboy. The description makes his looks immediately conspicuous, but the entourage and the dinner arrangement show how celebrity affected even the practical shape of the evening: his planned attendance had to be refused, then his arrival brought a large group into the gathering anyway.
The next day, the diarist met Travolta again at lunch and obtained his autograph on a napkin. That small keepsake connects the private encounter to the larger machinery of fandom surrounding him. Later, at the Gay Lynn theater, thousands of paparazzi and fans gathered for the world premiere, an unusually large occasion for Houston. Their attention fell especially on Travolta as the guests arrived. Diane von Furstenberg walked the aisles in a sheriff’s badge marked with a slogan, while Barry Diller sat behind the diarist; then Travolta came in surrounded by people and sat close behind them. The guests joined the photographers in taking pictures, and the screening began amid the same atmosphere of public excitement. The diary presents the premiere not simply as a film showing but as a crowded social performance in which the star’s entrance was one of the main attractions.
At Gilley’s: proximity and spectacle
After the screening, the group took a limousine to Gilley’s, where the movie had been filmed. They left just before the crowd and arrived ahead of the rush, but Travolta’s presence soon made the gathering difficult to manage. The diarist described him as sitting only inches away, again emphasizing his blue-green eyes, smile, teeth, and skin, and described him as kind and attentive in conversation. That close physical distance did not diminish his celebrity; it made the disparity between personal proximity and public access sharper. Once people recognized him, they pressed toward the table, and a police officer stood behind the group trying to protect it.
The crowd’s pressure also produced an absurdly intimate episode. The officer, who was drunk, repeatedly asked whether he could help, brought food and drinks to the table, and stayed with the group as people pushed in around Travolta. The diarist’s account makes the scene comic and unruly, but its details also show how quickly the star’s presence transformed an ordinary meal into a situation requiring a guard and improvised crowd control. Travolta’s friendliness, as the diarist perceived it, did not quiet the audience; it intensified the evening’s closeness to him without making him any less inaccessible as a celebrity.
The diarist placed himself second only to Travolta in the evening’s attention, while stressing that the gap was considerable. Fans were calling for Travolta to be given room, and the crowd’s response made the hierarchy plain. This comparison is a measure of the diarist’s own position in a world organized by recognition: he was famous enough to be noticed, but Travolta was the figure who could stop the proceedings. In the diary, that distinction is neither hidden nor softened. Travolta’s star power is registered through concrete consequences—the crush of people, the photographers, and the demands made on the theater staff—rather than through an abstract claim about fame.
The performer and the career
A year later, while recovering from pneumonia and distressed about Jon Gould, the diarist watched Urban Cowboy and focused on Travolta’s dancing, which he admired. The film became part of an evening of acute personal sadness: its connection to Paramount Pictures brought Jon to mind, and the diarist cried himself to sleep. Travolta is not presented as the cause of that distress; instead, the movie’s performance and its associations with the diarist’s private life occupy the same scene. The earlier fascination with the star’s looks and public magnetism thus has a quieter counterpart: his dancing remains compelling in a solitary viewing, even as the film intensifies the diarist’s sense of loss.
In 1982, after attending the premiere of Grease II, the diarist praised the movie and criticized Travolta for not appearing in it. He wondered why a star would choose not to work, framing the omission as an apparent waste of opportunity. The remark differs in tone from the unqualified admiration of the Houston encounters: Travolta remains an object of interest, but now the diary evaluates his professional choices rather than his appearance or manners. Taken together, the episodes give him a compact but changing presence—first a magnetic performer whose arrival commands a crowd, then a dancer whose film accompanies private grief, and finally a star whose absence from a sequel prompts reproach.