Readify

Catholic teaching on suicide as a sin

The Bell Jar

The Catholic teaching that suicide is a grave sin becomes, for Esther Greenwood, a possible reason to seek help when she is considering suicide. She does not present herself as a convinced Catholic; instead, she weighs the doctrine pragmatically, hoping that confession and repentance might interrupt her suicidal thinking. The episode makes the teaching a tentative resource rather than a settled faith, and exposes the limits Esther sees in religious authority as a solution to a continuing crisis.

A Possible Restraint

Esther considers entering the Catholic Church because she understands that Catholics regard suicide as a serious sin. She wonders whether that belief could help persuade her not to kill herself. Her interest is conditional: she imagines concentrating on the sin and letting a priest help her repent, without disclosing that she rejects central Catholic beliefs.

The possibility emerges against a family history of shifting religious affiliations. Esther recalls that she was raised Methodist for the first nine years of her life, before her father’s death and the family’s move coincided with a change to Unitarianism. Her mother had also once been Catholic and later Methodist; Esther’s aunt had left the Catholic Church, then returned to it after falling in love with an Italian Catholic. This background makes religious identity appear changeable rather than an unquestioned inheritance.

Belief and Practical Limits

Esther names doctrines she does not believe, including life after death, the virgin birth, the Inquisition’s legitimacy, and papal infallibility. Yet she does not regard disbelief as necessarily preventing her from approaching a priest. The contemplated appeal is focused on one moral teaching and its possible effect: she might accept the Church’s help in resisting suicide without accepting its wider theology.

That distinction also reveals the limited scope she attributes to religious practice. Even the Catholic Church, she thinks, cannot occupy a person’s whole life: prayer does not remove the need to eat, work, and live in the world. The doctrine may offer a reason to pause or repent, but it cannot by itself settle the everyday circumstances that remain after prayer.

Significance in Esther’s Crisis

The teaching is therefore neither a simple expression of Esther’s faith nor an assurance that she will be safe. It enters her thinking as an improvised possible safeguard, considered while she searches for something that might dissuade her from suicide. Her willingness to entertain help alongside her explicit disbelief captures the instability of the moment: she is not persuaded by an entire religious system, but is testing whether one of its prohibitions can still matter to her.