Ephrata
The Boys in the BoatEphrata, then a town of just 516 people in Washington’s desolate scablands, became the setting for a gathering that gave a national public-works project a local and collective meaning. On August 4, twenty thousand people converged there to hear Franklin D. Roosevelt present the proposed Grand Coulee Dam as a way to bring water, power, and jobs to an arid region—and to make people’s shared effort a response to hard times.
Setting and Convergence
Ephrata lay not far from the Columbia River and the fifty-mile dry canyon called Grand Coulee. Its isolation made the scale of the gathering striking: early in the morning, Seattle residents drove east over the Cascades, while people from Spokane headed west with picnic hampers and sandwiches. Chief George Friedlander and a delegation of Colville Indians traveled south in buckskins, moccasins, and ceremonial headdresses. By late morning, automobiles arriving from different directions crowded the roads into the small town.
Roosevelt’s Address
By midafternoon, the visitors had gathered behind a rope line. George Pocock and his family were among them when Roosevelt appeared on a platform, his cigarette holder angled upward. The crowd greeted him with a roar, and repeatedly interrupted his measured speech with applause and cheers. He described what the dam’s $175 million in public spending was intended to accomplish: reclaiming 1.2 million acres of desert for farming, supplying irrigation water to millions more acres of existing farmland, generating abundant low-cost electricity for use across the West, and creating thousands of jobs to build the hydroelectric and irrigation infrastructure.
The address framed the Columbia’s unused flow not as a problem confined to Washington or Idaho, but as a task shared across the country. Roosevelt also held out the prospect that electricity could become an ordinary resource for every home within reach of a transmission line. He closed by praising the people before him for grasping their opportunities and expressing confidence that the project would be carried through for the country’s benefit. The crowd answered with another roar of approval.
A Place of Collective Hope
The gathering took place against a summer of persistent hardship: although employment had risen slightly and the stock market had stabilized, the hard times still felt much the same to most Americans, while debate over Roosevelt’s policies had grown heated. In Ephrata, the proposed dam offered a more affirmative public vision—not an immediate resolution of hardship, but the possibility that people could address it together through a large undertaking.
Many who attended would remember the day as a first real hint of hope. The scene’s significance lies in the contrast between individual powerlessness and collective action: if people could do little alone to change their circumstances, the gathering suggested, they might still contribute by pitching in and pulling together. Ephrata thus became more than the location of a presidential appearance; for those present, it was where a promise of shared work briefly took visible form.