Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper
The Boys in the BoatThe Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper was both a news outlet and a civic megaphone: through its sports coverage and Royal Brougham’s promotion of rowing, it helped make the University of Washington crew a source of shared identity and growing recognition. The paper’s role extended beyond reporting results. It presented the team as a way for a city long accustomed to being overlooked to claim a place in the national sporting imagination.
The paper and its promoter
Since joining the paper in 1910, Royal Brougham had become a conspicuous presence in public life. His reputation rested on tenacious reporting, extensive connections, and an ability to draw information from celebrated figures. He was also a promoter, intent on replacing outsiders’ image of a gray logging-and-fishing town with something more sophisticated. He saw a world-class rowing team as one means of doing so: success in the sport could bring prestige not only to the university but to the city around it.
That ambition took shape against a wider rowing culture. In the 1920s and 1930s, college crew attracted large crowds and sustained national press attention, while elite Eastern schools drew on traditions associated with Eton College and sent oarsmen to universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. The University of Washington and the University of California at Berkeley had built a following of their own through a rivalry dating to 1903, but Western programs had fewer resources, little access to wealthy patrons, and limited recognition beyond the coast. Brougham believed that the center of American collegiate rowing might shift west—and that the Seattle crew could help bring it to the city.
Rowing as public news
The paper’s interest in the crew belonged to a period when collegiate rowing could command attention on a national scale. Major regattas drew enormous crowds, and radio carried their results to listeners well beyond the course. At Poughkeepsie, attendance reached as many as 125,000 in 1929. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper’s promotion of Washington’s rowing therefore joined a sport whose contests already had the power to make a university team a public event.
The team’s victories gave residents a subject to follow across ordinary routines. Readers could encounter the crew in the morning paper, then return to the story in The Seattle Times that evening; they could talk about it with a barber who cared about the same races. After the Washington crews swept in California and found success at Poughkeepsie, the prospect of future Olympic victories further enlarged the stakes. Length by length, the team made the city more visible and gave people there a reason to feel connected to one another during a deeply troubled period.
Reporting hardship and uncertainty
The paper also carried news of the economic pressures reshaping the region. As conditions worsened after the devastating dust storm of April 14, job notices that had begun appearing again gave way to anxiety about new arrivals and competition for work. On May 4, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper announced an approaching westward migration. Employment agencies received inquiries from Missouri and Arkansas for any kind of work, while farmers asked about cheap land near the Puget Sound. The paper’s reporting conveyed both the hope attached to the Northwest and the strain likely to accompany that influx.
In its sports coverage, the paper could also challenge decisions made by the rowing program. Royal Brougham backed the sophomores for months, even after their performances had grown sloppy. When trials showed that they started poorly but became smoother and closed strongly, he and other sportswriters questioned whether Al Ulbrickson had correctly judged their prospects. The distinction mattered because the varsity course at Poughkeepsie was four miles long: the sophomores’ late-race strength might count for more there than their faltering starts suggested.
After Washington’s varsity finished third, Brougham directly pressed Ulbrickson about demoting the sophomores. Ulbrickson defended his decision by emphasizing the strength and size of the opposition; the next morning, Brougham returned to the issue, noting that the sophomores had looked fresher late in their trial than the varsity. The exchange made the paper more than a celebrant of victories: it was also a public forum in which the coach’s judgment and the team’s prospects could be contested.
The coaching story as headline
The paper’s sports desk gave the uncertainty around Washington’s coaching staff prominent treatment. On June 21, it ran a banner announcing that a $10,000 offer would be made to freshman coach Tom Bolles by an unnamed Eastern college. Bolles denied having been approached that afternoon, and rumors circulated that he might instead replace Al Ulbrickson in Seattle. The report brought the program’s unsettled leadership into public view just as Bolles’s reputation was rising and Ulbrickson’s was falling.
Two days later, Royal Brougham sought to quiet the speculation, telling readers that Bolles had promised not to take Ulbrickson’s position unless Ulbrickson had already moved on. The assurance did not resolve the matter for people outside the university administration, and even Ulbrickson did not know what would happen. In this episode, the newspaper’s influence lay in both its capacity to set a story in motion and its effort to shape how readers understood the rumors. Across sports, civic promotion, and economic reporting, it made distant contests and immediate uncertainties part of the same local conversation.