Cisco
The Brass VerdictCisco is Mickey Haller’s investigator and a trusted partner in the inquiry surrounding the Walter Elliot trial. His work on juror number seven begins with a quiet phone call from the stacks of Book Soup and develops into an effort to verify whether the juror is who the court records say he is. The assignment places Cisco at the boundary between investigation and risk: what he uncovers could matter to the defense, but being caught could imperil both him and Haller.
Role and Working Relationship
Haller contacts Cisco from an empty alcove at Book Soup, choosing a place where Patrick Henson will not overhear the conversation. The setting underscores that this is not an ordinary request for background information: Haller wants the inquiry kept private. When Cisco jokes about whom he is supposed to kill, the two laugh, easing the tension that has built through the night before Haller explains the actual assignment.
The Juror Investigation
Haller asks Cisco to shadow juror number seven and find out everything he can, warning that discovery could cost them both their opportunity to continue. The target is a seated juror, making the task unusually sensitive. Cisco accepts the assignment and later calls Haller at home at ten o’clock, saying that he is nearby in Hollywood and can come over with news.
At Haller’s house, Cisco reports that the juror’s name is David McSweeney and that he believes almost everything on McSweeney’s J-sheet is false. The form had supplied the starting point for Cisco’s work: it contained a juror’s name, profession, residential ZIP code, and answers to basic questions used during jury selection. Cisco’s initial conclusion therefore raises more than a question about inaccurate paperwork; it puts the juror’s presented identity under suspicion. The available account stops before Cisco gives examples, leaving the full extent and explanation of the apparent falsifications unresolved.
Secrecy, Trust, and Narrative Function
Cisco’s investigation depends on Haller’s confidence in his discretion. Haller arranges a private call and later meets him on the deck rather than discussing the findings where others might hear. Cisco, in turn, brings preliminary news directly to Haller and frames it as something to be checked carefully rather than presenting suspicion as proof.
The assignment shifts the trial’s uncertainty from the evidence against Elliot to the reliability of the jury process itself. Cisco’s discovery does not, by itself, establish who McSweeney is or why the J-sheet is false. It does create a new investigative lead: before the defense can understand what juror number seven means for the case, Cisco must establish the facts behind the identity the court has been given.