Readify

Honor and Sexual Restraint

The Decameron

Honor and Sexual Restraint in the Decameron is not simply a synonym for chastity. Across the stories, honor can be imposed as a penalty or a means of controlling women, but it can also be freely chosen: a husband trusts his wife, a suitor renounces an opportunity to possess her, and a king masters an appetite that his power could otherwise satisfy. These contrasting cases make restraint meaningful not as submission to a single sexual rule, but as a test of how people use power over themselves and others.

Gendered Conditions of Honor

The book’s opening account of its purpose describes women in love as having fewer ways to escape distress than men. Daughters, wives, and sisters are subject to the wishes of fathers, mothers, brothers, and husbands, and often remain confined within their chambers, turning inward thoughts over without the diversions available to men. The promised stories are offered as comfort to women in that restricted position. Honor therefore belongs to a social world in which women’s desires are acknowledged but their opportunities for acting on them are sharply limited.

That constraint appears again in the debate over women’s need for male guidance. Pampinea proposes that the women leave the plague-stricken city, while Filomena warns that a company of women cannot safely govern itself without other direction; Elisa likewise describes men as women’s heads. Such claims frame the social assumptions against which the stories’ women act. Their resourcefulness is not evidence that external restrictions are absent: it develops within households, marriages, legal systems, and clerical authority that can limit movement and define acceptable conduct.

Law, Reputation, and Female Self-Defense

Madam Filippa’s case exposes the violence that can hide behind the language of sexual honor. In Prato, a statute prescribed burning for any wife caught by her husband in adultery, without distinguishing her from a woman who sold sex. When Rinaldo de' Pugliesi discovers Madam Filippa with Lazzerino de' Guazzagliotri, he is angry enough to contemplate killing them, then turns to the law to obtain his wife’s death. The legal penalty makes a husband’s claim over his wife’s sexuality a matter of public punishment.

Madam Filippa refuses the escape her friends and relatives urge. She appears before the provost and chooses to admit the charge rather than flee into exile or deny her lover. Her answer puts her own speech at the center of a proceeding designed to punish her, and the story makes her composure and candor the means by which she confronts the law. The contrast between her willing confession and the statute’s indiscriminate severity shows that sexual honor is not a neutral standard: it can be enforced against women even when their own understanding of loyalty and desire differs from the law’s.

The account of jealous husbands makes domestic control another form of coercion. Fiammetta argues that wives already spend the week confined by household duties, while jealous men make even their holidays more restrictive and doleful. In her judgment, a wife’s resistance to a husband who is jealous without cause should not be condemned. The argument does not treat every act of adultery as equivalent; it asks readers to consider the confinement and suspicion against which such acts occur.

Restraint Against Sexual Pressure

Madam Piccarda’s encounter with the rector of Fiesole presents a different imbalance of power. A young widow of noble birth, she is approached by the old rector, who is her spiritual father as well as a priest. He is presumptuous and ill-conditioned, and his desire is unwanted. She answers by invoking the obligations attached to his position and age, as well as the discretion expected of her as a widow, and makes clear that she will not return his advances in the manner he seeks. Her refusal distinguishes affection in the abstract from sexual consent: she can acknowledge his professed love without granting him the intimacy he demands.

Madam Catalina’s rescue by Messer Gentile de' Carisendi gives restraint a more transformative form. Believed dead and abandoned by her family, she is brought out of her tomb by Gentile, who discovers that she still lives. His mother restores her with hot baths and fires, and Catalina, pregnant by her husband Niccoluccio Caccianimico, asks that Gentile protect her honor and allow her to return home. Gentile promises to treat her as a dear sister, not as an object of his former desire. He asks her to remain until he can present her publicly to her husband, then returns secretly to Modena while she gives birth.

At a banquet in Bologna, Gentile recounts how he found and cared for Catalina before placing her and her son in Niccoluccio’s arms. He releases her from every promise she made him and assures her husband that she lived chastely in his mother’s house. His restraint protects Catalina’s dignity and restores a family relationship that her relatives had assumed ended in death. The resolution also changes Gentile’s relation to Niccoluccio: he remains a friend to the husband and both families. Honor here is secured not by seclusion or punishment, but by a rescuer’s refusal to exploit a woman who depends on his protection.

Trust, Generosity, and Mutual Renunciation

In the story of Dianora, a promise made under pressure tests the difference between bodily compliance and freely given desire. After Messer Ansaldo creates a miraculous garden in winter, Dianora fears that she is bound by her promise to grant his request. Her husband, Gilberto, first criticizes her for listening to Ansaldo and making terms about her chastity. Yet, knowing her intention was pure, he tells her to seek release from the promise; if that proves impossible, she may yield her body for this one occasion without yielding her soul. His response combines a warning about the danger of the bargain with trust in his wife and concern for the consequences Ansaldo might bring upon them.

Dianora goes to Ansaldo at daybreak and explains that she has come not through love or a pledge of her own, but at her husband’s command. That knowledge immediately changes Ansaldo’s conduct. Moved by Gilberto’s generosity, he refuses to take advantage of her and receives her as a sister, allowing her to leave freely. He later gives up the payment promised to the magician who made the garden; after three days the garden disappears. Gilberto and Ansaldo become close friends, and Ansaldo’s desire changes into an honorable affection. The episode makes restraint reciprocal: Gilberto risks his own honor to release his wife from danger, and Ansaldo answers that trust by renouncing his claim.

Self-Mastery as a Measure of Power

The story of Charles the Old sets sexual restraint on a political scale. Enamored of Ginevra the Fair, he also desires her sister, Isotta the Blonde, and considers taking both daughters from their father, Messer Neri. Guy de Montfort rebukes him for contemplating such a betrayal after receiving Neri’s hospitality. He also reminds the king that the violence Manfred committed against women helped open the way for Charles’s conquest of the kingdom. A ruler who repeated that violence, Guy argues, would damage the honor won through victory and betray a host who had trusted him.

Charles recognizes the force of the rebuke. Rather than use royal power to seize the women, he arranges magnificent dowries and marries Ginevra to Messer Maffeo da Palizzi and Isotta to Messer Guglielmo della Magna. He then leaves for Apulia and disciplines his desire. The story presents his renunciation as more than courteous behavior: a king’s honor depends on governing the appetite that his authority could satisfy without consent. Alongside Catalina’s protection, Dianora’s release, and Madam Filippa’s defiance of unjust law, this episode shows the ideal at its most demanding when power is voluntarily limited.