Jehannot de Chevigné
The DecameronJehannot de Chevigné is a wealthy Parisian merchant whose friendship with Abraham, a Jewish merchant, sets in motion a conversion story built around a sharp paradox: Abraham finds the Christian clergy corrupt, yet takes the continued growth of Christianity as evidence of divine support. Jehannot’s persistence brings Abraham to Rome to judge the faith by its leading representatives; his return leads not to the rejection Jehannot feared, but to baptism and a new life as a Christian.
Identity and Friendship
Jehannot is introduced as a great merchant in Paris, trading in silks and fabrics and described as loyal and upright. He is a close friend of Abraham, himself wealthy, honest, and trustworthy. Jehannot’s concern for his friend is religious as well as personal: he fears that Abraham’s Jewish faith will leave his soul lost, and urges him to embrace what Jehannot regards as Christian truth.
The story presents their friendship as the ground for Jehannot’s efforts. He does not approach Abraham as a stranger to be won by a single argument; he returns to the subject repeatedly, relying on their bond even when Abraham firmly says that he will live and die in the faith in which he was born.
Persuasion and the Journey to Rome
Jehannot first makes his case in the manner of a merchant, with arguments the narrator characterizes as rather crude. Abraham nevertheless finds these arguments increasingly persuasive, whether because of his affection for Jehannot or because, as the story’s religious framing suggests, words placed in Jehannot’s mouth may have had a higher source. Persuasion does not immediately produce conversion: Abraham remains attached to his own faith and declines to be hurried into a decision.
Instead, Abraham proposes a test. He will go to Rome to observe the pope, whom Jehannot calls God’s vicar on earth, together with the cardinals and the rest of the papal court. If their conduct confirms Jehannot’s claims, Abraham will become Christian; if it does not, he will remain Jewish. Jehannot continues to press him, but the journey gives Abraham a standard of judgment that goes beyond his friend’s words: the conduct of the people who lead the Church.
The Clergy’s Failure and Abraham’s Conclusion
Abraham’s observations in Rome seem, at first, to refute Jehannot’s appeal. He sees churchmen given to lust, gluttony, drunkenness, and greed. He judges that they traffic in money and sell sacred things and church offices, disguising simony as “procuration” and gluttony as “sustentation.” The language of religious duty, he concludes, does not conceal the intentions behind their conduct. Displeased by what he has witnessed, he returns to Paris.
Jehannot asks what he made of the pope, the cardinals, and their court, expecting nothing less than Abraham’s conversion. Abraham instead condemns their lack of piety, devotion, good works, and exemplary lives, and says that the papal court seems more like a workshop of the devil than a divine institution. Yet he draws a conclusion opposite to the one Jehannot anticipates: if the Church’s leaders labor to undermine Christianity and fail, while the religion continues to grow brighter and more widespread, then the Holy Spirit must be its foundation and support. The observed corruption becomes, in Abraham’s reasoning, evidence not against the faith but for its endurance beyond the conduct of its clergy.
Baptism and Narrative Significance
Abraham tells Jehannot that he now wishes to become Christian and asks to be baptized. Jehannot, who had expected the journey to produce the contrary result, is overjoyed. He accompanies Abraham to the Church of Our Lady of Paris, where the clergy baptize him; Jehannot stands sponsor at the font and gives him the name Giovanni. He then arranges for men of learning to instruct the new convert in Christian doctrine, which Abraham quickly understands. The story reports that he thereafter lives as a good and worthy man devoted to religion.
Jehannot’s role is therefore that of friend, persistent advocate, and sponsor, but the conversion does not simply validate his initial arguments. Abraham’s decision arises from confronting the gulf between Christian teaching and clerical behavior, then interpreting the survival of the faith despite that gulf as a sign of divine support. In the tale told by Neifile, Jehannot’s sincere concern begins the inquiry; Abraham’s independent judgment supplies its decisive turn.
