Grant Dow
The DryGrant Dow’s significance lies in the gap between the crude, conspicuous bully first seen by Aaron Falk and the calculating accomplice revealed in the account of Ellie Deacon’s death. Mal Deacon’s nephew and Ellie’s cousin, Grant is positioned to inherit Mal’s farm, a prospect that connects him to the land disputes surrounding the Hadlers. His hostility makes him an immediate suspect in the present-day investigation, but the evidence ultimately establishes a more specific and disturbing role in the older crime: he helped conceal Ellie’s body and proposed using a note naming Falk to implicate him.
Identity and Background
At Luke Hadler’s funeral, Grant is a large, ruddy-faced man in his midforties, with a scruffy beard and a defiant manner. His appearance is a marked change from Falk’s memory of him as a lean, muscular twenty-five-year-old. Gretchen Schoner identifies him to Falk, who has not recognized him among the mourners. Grant’s silent challenge to the crowd after an accusation about Luke draws attention to his capacity to intimidate: people meet his stare, then look away. Barb Hadler and Gerry Hadler do not appear to hear the remark, sparing them a direct confrontation at the funeral.
Grant is Ellie Deacon’s cousin and Mal Deacon’s nephew. He works as a laborer, taking odd jobs in plumbing and building rather than caring for Mal full-time. Mal’s mental decline leaves him wandering into town for drinks or scowling at people with his dog; Grant is not described as his constant caregiver. He nevertheless moves alongside his uncle in public and, when Mal mistakes Falk for his dead father, Grant briefly seems to consider correcting him before giving up and easing him into a chair. The gesture is gentle, but it also leaves the confusion intact.
Confrontations with Falk
Grant’s hostility toward Falk is established at the wake and sharpened when he encounters him at the Fleece bar. On that first meeting, he blocks the view from Falk’s table, raises his glass in a mock salute, and taunts him for attending. He invokes Mal as an audience to the provocation, then turns Falk’s presence into a challenge about whether he belongs in town. When Mal becomes upset after mistaking Falk for his father, Grant blames Falk rather than explaining the mistake. Greg Raco answers by displaying his Victoria Police badge and turning the question of who should be there back on Grant.
The hostility is not confined to one encounter. On a later visit to the bar, Grant arrives in the same shorts and Balinese-beer T-shirt he wore the previous day, sets down a half-empty glass with a bang, and brushes aside the idea that he has been barred. His return makes the pub’s rules seem ineffective against him. When Falk reacts angrily to the discovery of Ellie’s body and insists that he had nothing to do with her death, Grant confronts him with the old accusation and points out that Luke Hadler, the person Falk invokes, is no longer alive to speak. The taunt links Falk’s unresolved past to the current investigation while showing Grant’s readiness to use grief and suspicion as weapons.
The Farm and the Hadler Investigation
Grant’s expected inheritance gives his antagonism a material context. David McMurdo reports that Mal is leaving him the farm, a property that could be valuable to Asian investment groups interested in land. The Hadler land borders the Deacon farm; together, the parcels could be more attractive to a buyer. With Luke dead, a sale of the Hadler property seems less unlikely than it would have been while he was alive and managing it. Falk notes the potential value of the adjoining land, but the circumstances do not establish that Grant caused the Hadler killings to obtain it.
Suspicion nevertheless gathers around Grant during the investigation. Karen Hadler’s library receipt carries the handwritten name “Grant??” and, beneath it, Falk’s own phone number. The name is a clue that points toward Grant but does not explain what Karen suspected or why she recorded Falk’s number beside it. Raco later warns Falk that his focus on Grant and Mal may be shaped by his hatred of Mal over what happened to him more than twenty years earlier. He also says both men have alibis for the Hadler shootings: Mal’s phone call appears genuine, supported by a pharmacy worker who remembers it, while police are seeking the phone records. The investigation therefore does not confirm Grant’s involvement in the Hadler murders, even as Karen’s note and his inheritance keep him in view.
Ellie’s Death and Grant’s Role
The revelation about Ellie’s death changes the meaning of Grant’s connection to Mal. In the account of the killing, Mal remembers that he had to promise the farm to Grant while they searched the riverbank for stones to weigh Ellie’s body down. Grant had found the note in Ellie’s pocket that named Falk and suggested it would be useful to leave it in Ellie’s room. They searched until the light disappeared, but did not find her backpack. The evidence describes Grant participating in the concealment and proposing the use of the note; it does not establish that he killed Ellie. Mal’s account, by contrast, centers on his own violence and later uncertainty about whether he had meant to hold his daughter so tightly.
The farm promise and the planted note give Grant’s actions a double consequence. He receives the prospect of inheritance as Mal and Grant conceal Ellie’s body, while Falk’s name is made to look like evidence against him. The scheme helps explain why Falk was blamed and driven from Kiewarra, and why his return is met with hostility. Grant’s later taunts are therefore not just the outbursts of an unpleasant local man: they come from someone whose earlier suggestion helped sustain the false accusation at the center of Falk’s history.
Narrative Role
Grant is first made legible through public behavior: a heckle at a funeral, a stare that silences other mourners, and repeated provocations at the pub. His coarse manner encourages suspicion, but the novel separates that impression from proof in the Hadler case. Karen’s uncertain notation raises questions; the reported alibis prevent those questions from becoming a confirmed accusation. The eventual account of Ellie’s death supplies a different kind of evidence, clarifying Grant’s complicity in concealment and framing without making him the killer.
That distinction makes Grant an important link between the novel’s two strands of suspicion. In the present, he is a plausible suspect because of his hostility and his expected inheritance. In Falk’s past, he is more concretely implicated in the deliberate manipulation of evidence after Ellie’s death. The contrast between those roles preserves uncertainty around the Hadler killings while exposing the practical harm behind the old lie: Grant helped direct blame toward Falk, and the farm he stood to inherit was part of the price Mal promised for his assistance.


