Readify

Engagement Ring

The Greatest Beer Run Ever: A Memoir of Friendship, Loyalty, and War

The Engagement Ring is the object through which Susan McGahern’s long engagement to Francis (Frank) McGahern becomes visible as both a promise kept and a promise put to the test. For years it binds Susan to an absent fiancé; when she returns it, the gesture abruptly changes the course of their relationship. Francis comes back to Ballinamore the following day, and the engagement moves toward a wedding after seven years of delay.

An Engagement Sustained Across Distance

Susan and Francis became engaged before he left Ballinamore for his next posting, in Burtonport. Political unrest kept young guards moving from one station to another, and Francis’s work took him to different parts of the country. The engagement consequently lasted many years, while Susan remained in Ballinamore, teaching at Lisacarn School and helping Maggie in the shop. She had admirers, but treated the ring she wore as binding, as though its promise were as plain and durable as gold.

The object held two lives in unequal suspension. Francis had repeated opportunities to postpone visits and, over the years, had dalliances with other women; Susan, though not without attention from others, continued to wear the ring. The memoir gives no account of the ring’s design or physical appearance. Its force lies instead in what Susan made it mean: a commitment that endured despite distance, delay, and the uncertain conduct of the person who had given it.

The Return in May 1932

In May 1932, the year of the Eucharistic Congress, Susan returned the ring. The narrator does not claim certainty about why. Rumours of Francis’s other relationships may have mattered; so may Susan’s interest in a young teacher who loved her, or the pressure of family and friends who considered the engagement’s length improper. The narrator suspects that all these influences may have converged, while distinguishing that uncertainty about motive from the certainty of the act itself: the return was not done for effect.

Its effect was immediate. Francis, who had found excuses to delay visits, was in Ballinamore the very next day. He did not leave until Susan agreed that they would marry in August. The ring’s return thus reverses the pattern of the preceding years: rather than waiting for Francis to decide when to visit or advance the marriage, Susan’s action forces a decision. The object that had quietly signified her fidelity now makes the cost of continued postponement impossible to ignore.

A Promise Reaffirmed, Not Simply Recovered

The surviving account of the relationship is framed by correspondence, much of it concerned with practical arrangements for the wedding. Susan wrote from Ballinamore while Francis was stationed at Shanaglish in Galway. The letters dealt with the required letters of freedom, the location of the wedding, the honeymoon, clothes, and guests. In their ordinary details, the correspondence records a relationship being converted from a prolonged engagement into a planned marriage.

The letters also register Susan’s happiness. Her sign-offs retain the nationalist flavour of the time, and she wrote of spending a day at the convent listening to a broadcast of the Eucharistic Congress on the Athlone station. From a pilgrimage to St Patrick’s Purgatory on Lough Derg, undertaken to ask God’s blessing on the marriage, she described feeling low after the vigil but happy afterward. These details place the ring’s meaning within a wider set of actions through which Susan prepared for the wedding: correspondence, pilgrimage, and the practical work of arranging a shared future.

Francis was both incensed and shaken by the ring’s return. Once Susan had agreed to marry him in August, he wanted to give the ring back immediately. She refused that offer, explaining that they would soon be married and that then he would give her a plain gold band. The distinction matters: she did not treat an immediate return of the old ring as an adequate answer to the rupture. Her response locates its proper renewal in the marriage they had now agreed to make.

The Ring and the Couple’s Uneasy Balance

The exchange reveals a difference in how the two approached the promise. Susan had worn the ring as binding through years of separation; Francis’s insistence on returning it immediately came only after her gesture had made the engagement’s uncertainty concrete. The ring could be restored, but the sequence gave its restoration a new condition: marriage in August, rather than another indefinite postponement.

The aftermath also shows how Francis reacted when placed on the defensive. Instead of staying with the question raised by the returned ring, he shifted to Susan’s supposed extravagance after noticing a jar of powder on her dressing table. Susan answered that the powder belonged to Maggie, that it had been a gift, and that she only sometimes used it on her hands. This separate accusation does not alter the ring’s central role, but it places the reconciliation alongside a continuing imbalance in their exchanges: a decisive act by Susan brings Francis back, while his response turns briefly toward an unrelated reproach.

As an object in the memoir, the Engagement Ring is consequential without being described as precious or visually distinctive. Its significance accumulates through use: Susan wears it while Francis is away, returns it after seven years, and refuses its immediate restoration until marriage is imminent. The ring records the change from endurance to insistence, and from a promise sustained largely by Susan to a future that both have finally agreed to enter.

Related StoryFlow