2007 Amager Island Police Shooting
The Hanging GirlThe 2007 Amager Island Police Shooting was an attack on three police officers on January 26, 2007: Anker Høyer was murdered, Hardy Henningsen suffered permanent physical damage, and Carl Mørck was shot. The case returned forcefully to public view more than seven years later, when police displayed the weapon they had identified and announced that the Amager crimes were likely connected to nail-gun murders elsewhere.
The attack and its consequences
The officers’ ordeal is described through its lasting consequences as well as the attack itself. Anker Høyer was killed, Hardy Henningsen remained severely marked by the episode and could not attend the later press conference, and Carl Mørck had been shot. The violence did not end with the incident: the injuries endured by the survivors and the case’s long investigative afterlife made it a defining event in their lives.
Carl’s response at the press conference made the past present again. As the weapon was held up, he recognized the muzzle from which five 9mm projectiles had been fired, projectiles that had damaged several lives, including his own. His hands and arms would have been shaking, and he felt cold in the forehead and feverish in his body. When asked how it felt to see the weapon, he pushed its muzzle aside with his index finger. The gesture was brief, but it answered the question physically rather than verbally.
The weapon and the renewed investigation
At the press conference, Terje Ploug identified the weapon as a PAMAS G1, a semi-heavy automatic pistol and a variant of the better-known Beretta 92, produced for the French Gendarmerie Nationale. Its serial number had been filed off. Because many such pistols had disappeared from military arsenals over the years, investigators had no way to establish the history of this particular weapon. Ballistic testing, however, confirmed that it was the pistol used in the 2007 shooting.
The weapon’s display turned an old investigation into a public statement of renewed commitment. Lars Bjørn said the police treated the killing of officers on duty as a high-priority matter and would continue investigating until those responsible were brought to trial. The announcement also revised the apparent boundaries between cases: police now considered it likely that the nail-gun murders in Schiedam, the Netherlands, and the crimes on Amager and in Sorø were connected after all. The connection was presented as a likelihood, not as a completed determination.
The event’s place in the story
The press conference joined official procedure to Carl’s personal history. The pistol was evidence, but its appearance also confronted him with the physical trace of the shooting: the same muzzle, the five bullets, and the damage still carried by those involved. Around him, reporters reacted as he moved the weapon away, while police officials used the occasion to explain both the case’s priority and its possible links to other murders.
The shooting therefore functions as more than a past crime revisited. Its consequences remain embodied in Carl and Hardy, while the recovery and ballistic identification of the pistol open a wider investigative possibility. The case moves from an isolated attack on officers toward a suspected connection spanning Denmark and the Netherlands, without diminishing the original loss and injury at its centre.