Christian Habersaat–Bjarke Habersaat Father–Son Relationship
The Hanging GirlChristian Habersaat and Bjarke Habersaat’s father–son relationship is the hidden human cost at the center of Christian’s long pursuit of Alberte Goldschmid’s killer. Bjarke knows enough to understand the family secret behind the case, but keeps silent; Christian, convinced that his son may be responsible, cannot bring himself to pursue that suspicion to its conclusion. Their bond is therefore marked not by a direct confrontation but by years of concealment, divided loyalties, and a final confession that leaves the family’s fate to others.
Family and the Alberte case
Christian’s connection to the case began when, as a uniformed officer, he found Alberte’s body in a tree beside the road. At the Bornholm Folk High School, the students had experienced November 20, 1997, as an ordinary day, unaware that Alberte had been killed that morning. More than a day passed before she was found. For Christian, the discovery became an enduring fixation; for Bjarke, it became a crime whose clues would reach directly into his own household.
Christian’s investigation repeatedly returned to the people and relationships around Alberte. He questioned witnesses at the school, including Inge Dalby, about the man Alberte had been seeing, and his insistence left some of them feeling that he wanted them to identify someone among themselves as the culprit. He also pursued the possibility that Alberte had been struck by a VW Kombi. In later years, that line of inquiry would become entangled with suspicions about Frank Brennan, June Habersaat’s former lover. Christian’s official investigation was thus also a family investigation, though its most consequential evidence remained within the family for years.
Bjarke’s knowledge and silence
The decisive private turning point came after June had borrowed a vehicle and used its plow. Karin Kofoed saw June put the plow back in her trunk. June later said that Karin had told Bjarke what she had seen. By then the search for Alberte had begun, and that evening Christian told the family that he had found her in a tree. June understood from Bjarke’s reaction that he had worked out what had happened. The account does not describe a conversation in which father and son addressed the matter; instead, it emphasizes what Bjarke did not say. He never told his father.
That silence divided Bjarke’s loyalties. June recalled that he hated her for what had happened but did not expose her; in her telling, by keeping the secret, he let his father down instead. The burden also altered where Bjarke could live. When June moved out a few months later, he could not remain under the same roof as Christian. He stayed for a time with Karin and with June in Aakirkeby, then found a place of his own. The family’s fracture followed the secret without resolving it: distance replaced an accusation that never came.
Christian’s competing suspicions
Christian’s eventual account shows that his suspicion of Bjarke had existed alongside, not instead of, his pursuit of the VW Kombi man. He found an object Bjarke had apparently used in selling Christmas trees and remembered that Bjarke had been working on something of that kind. At first, the discovery strengthened his suspicion, but a splint at the crime scene and other clues gave him hope that his son was not involved. He also believed he could find no motive: he saw Bjarke as uninterested in women, a subject that had caused arguments between Christian and June, and could not understand why Bjarke would kill a girl he did not know.
The investigation’s uncertainty is central to the relationship. Christian’s suspicion of his son was serious, but he also had reason to pursue the possibility that the VW Kombi belonged to the man connected to Alberte and June. He knew about June’s relationship with that man, and information circulating on the island seemed to support the connection. The false trail did not simply distract Christian from the truth; it offered an alternative that allowed him to keep investigating without having to act against Bjarke. When he later admitted that he had been determined to pin the crime on an innocent man, he acknowledged how his own loyalties had shaped the pursuit.
Recognition and the unresolved bond
Christian’s understanding changed when he found a poem in a box of old PC games in Bjarke’s former room. The poem concerned Bjarke’s fascination with Frank Brennan. Christian then recognized that Bjarke had been in love with the same man as June and concluded that Alberte had been killed because her relationship with Frank displaced Bjarke. The motive he had once considered absent became, through the poem, the missing explanation. Christian’s realization was not only that his son was the killer, but that he had misread the emotional stakes in Bjarke’s life.
In his letter to the investigators, dated April 29, 2014, Christian apologized for insisting on the guilt of an innocent man when Bjarke had committed the crime. He said he could not bring himself to go after his own son and left Bjarke’s fate in the investigators’ hands. The decision neither absolves Bjarke nor resolves the father’s conflict: it records the limit of what Christian can do as both policeman and parent. Their relationship ends in silence once more, but this time Christian’s written admission makes the truth explicit. The case that had consumed him for years concludes with a recognition he cannot turn into an arrest himself.