Barrymore—Selden
The Hound of the BaskervillesBarrymore—Selden is a hidden alliance between the Baskerville Hall butler and his fugitive relative. Barrymore’s concern is expressed through practical, secret assistance: he leaves food for the man on the moor and hopes he has escaped the area. The connection also draws the household into legal danger, although the account does not specify the exact degree of their kinship or definitively identify Barrymore as the servant who supplied Selden’s clothes.
Kinship and Concealment
Watson’s questioning establishes that Selden is Barrymore’s relative, but the family relationship is never named more precisely. That distinction matters: Barrymore’s conduct is plainly personal, yet the narrative supplies no further family history to explain it. The relationship is revealed not through a formal introduction but through a guarded exchange about whether the fugitive has gone.
The conversation occurs after Watson asks whether this “precious relation” has departed or is still hiding nearby. Barrymore replies that he does not know, and hopes Selden has gone because his presence has brought trouble to the house. His words combine resentment at the disruption with evident concern for the relative’s fate. Barrymore does not announce the assistance as a confession; its extent emerges through Watson’s probing.
Food Left on the Moor
Barrymore says he has not heard from Selden since he last left food for him, three days earlier. He did not see the fugitive take it: when he returned, the food was gone. The detail makes the aid concrete while preserving uncertainty. Barrymore can report what he left and what he later found, but cannot say who collected it.
Watson presses the inference that Selden must therefore have been there. Barrymore qualifies it: another man might have taken the food. That possibility turns a seemingly straightforward clue into an unresolved one. The missing provisions indicate that someone may be using the hiding place, but do not establish that Selden himself remains nearby. Barrymore’s limited knowledge also leaves open whether the fugitive has moved on or whether another concealed presence has entered the mystery.
Clothes and Household Risk
After Selden’s death, Sherlock Holmes reveals that the body was wearing Sir Henry Baskerville’s clothes. He warns that the servant who gave them to Selden may get into trouble with the police. The servant is not named in that exchange, so the text does not directly confirm that Barrymore handed over the clothes. The incident nevertheless places the household’s assistance to Selden in a more dangerous light: aid that had helped him remain concealed also entangled the household in the consequences of the mistaken identity surrounding his death.
Holmes goes further, observing that the household is on the wrong side of the law in the matter and that Dr. Watson’s reports are incriminating. His remark frames the assistance not as a private family concern beyond public reach, but as conduct with possible legal consequences. The narrative thus distinguishes between Barrymore’s clear role in leaving food and the less specifically attributed act of providing clothes, while showing how the secret support around Selden could expose more than one person.
Secrecy and Significance
The relationship is disclosed in stages. First, Barrymore’s mention of a relative who has brought trouble prompts Watson to recognize that he knows of another man on the moor. Later, the discovery that Selden wore Sir Henry Baskerville’s clothes reveals the dangerous reach of the household’s aid. The initial uncertainty over who took the food and the later uncertainty over which servant supplied the clothes both keep the assistance partly concealed even as its consequences become clearer.
Barrymore’s connection to Selden helps explain why information about the fugitive is not immediately available to the investigators: the person questioned is also someone with a personal stake in his safety. Yet the relation is not presented as a full account of Selden’s life or as a detailed family history. Its significance lies in the conflict it creates between household loyalty and the demands of the investigation, and in the material traces—food left on the moor and clothes taken from Sir Henry—that make concealed aid visible.