Pierre and the Meaning of Absence
The ImaginaryThis flow follows Pierre as Sartre’s recurring example of how a real person can be intended through an image while appearing as absent.
increasing
Bearing strength in each event
decreasing
Pierre Is Remembered

The Friend as an Example
An absent person intended
Sartre asks what happens when someone forms an image of Pierre. The object of consciousness is Pierre himself, not an internal portrait that merely points outward to him.
The example makes the central problem tangible: an actual person can be directly intended even when he is not present to perception.
Two manners of relation
The same Pierre can be perceived when encountered and imagined when absent. The difference lies in consciousness’s mode of relation, not in there being two people.
An Image Combines Times

The Friend Beyond One Moment
Knowledge and feeling diverge
Sartre observes that an image of Pierre may show him in a familiar room even when knowledge places him elsewhere. The image can combine present beliefs with affective impressions formed across earlier encounters.
It does not necessarily represent one precise moment in Pierre’s life. Its appearance can gather several aspects into an unstable synthesis.
A meaningful tension
This mismatch helps explain the image’s ambiguity. Consciousness intends the real Pierre through material that gives him a different, condensed presence.
Absence Becomes the Image’s Sense

Pierre as Absent
A situation gives meaning
The desire to see Pierre defines a situation in which he is not presently given. His absence is not an accidental detail added after the image forms; it helps motivate what the image is.
The person intended remains the real Pierre, but he appears to consciousness precisely as unavailable here.
A general claim
Pierre’s example carries Sartre’s account from psychology into the relation between world, situation, and negation. An image makes a particular absence explicit against a real background.
Early in Part I, Chapter 1
During Part II’s analysis of the affective analogon
In the Conclusion’s analysis of world and image