Lord Montague and Geoffrey Pole's Alliance as Brothers
The King's CurseLord Montague and Geoffrey Pole’s alliance as brothers turns a close family bond into a proposed political front against Henry VIII’s treatment of Katherine of Aragon and Princess Mary. Montague frames their shared duty as a responsibility of the Plantagenet family; Geoffrey joins him in planning, carrying messages, and coordinating with Reginald Pole. Their partnership is purposeful but unequal in manner: Montague weighs the risks and directs the plan, while Geoffrey brings urgency and confidence.
Family Bonds and Political Identity
The brothers belong to a wider web of Plantagenet kinship, in which marriage, shared households, and blood relations connect people who might otherwise appear to be separate political actors. Margaret Pole describes the family as tightly interwoven, its members joined through cousins and marriages across England. She also recognizes the danger in that closeness: what sustains a family’s resources and influence can look, to a suspicious ruler, like a faction or conspiracy. The brothers’ alliance is therefore both personal and political before they make any explicit plan; their connections give them potential allies, but also make their family network vulnerable to scrutiny.
Their identity as Plantagenets gives the alliance its larger claim. When the brothers discuss acting together, Montague presents them as members of the White Rose and as the natural rulers of England, while describing Henry VIII as their cousin whom they hope to bring back to the right course. This appeal joins kinship to political legitimacy: their stated purpose is not simply to oppose the king, but to defend the queen and princess and restore what they regard as the proper relationship between ruler, family, and kingdom.
The pressure on that identity is visible in the contrast between family solidarity and royal power. Henry VIII has made the Church subject to his own rule, and Princess Mary recognizes that this places its wealth, laws, and courts under his possession. Montague brings her the news that the Church has surrendered and that the king intends to rule it himself, while Thomas More has resigned as Lord Chancellor. In the brothers’ political world, the crisis is no longer confined to a disputed marriage: religious authority, the princess’s standing, and the future of the royal succession are connected.
From Alarm to a Shared Plan
Montague takes the initiative in proposing action. He tells Margaret that the time has come to defend the queen and princess, and explains that he is under orders to travel to Calais. He proposes taking Geoffrey in his household so that Geoffrey can slip away there, meet Reginald, report on their friends and kinsmen in England, and carry messages to the Pope and a letter from Katherine to her nephew, Charles V. The plan gives the brothers complementary roles: Montague provides the route and political purpose; Geoffrey is to act as a discreet messenger between the family’s English connections and its allies abroad.
The intended intervention depends on foreign pressure as well as domestic support. Geoffrey reports that Reginald expects Charles V to invade if Henry publicly marries Anne Boleyn and sets Princess Mary aside. Montague presents the prospect of war as a consequence of the king’s actions, not as a conflict the brothers can control. Their own proposed contribution is to prepare a network of supporters and to communicate the situation to Reginald, the Pope, and the emperor.
Montague also explains why he believes the responsibility falls to their family. He lists figures who might have checked the king but, in his view, are dead, silenced, compromised, or unwilling to oppose him: the Duke of Buckingham has been executed, Wolsey and Warham are dead, John Fisher is ignored, and Thomas More has resigned. He sees the court’s advice as increasingly dominated by those serving the king’s immediate interests. Geoffrey’s response is to insist that Montague cannot act alone. When Montague says they must act together, Geoffrey answers with conviction, and Montague describes them as a united Plantagenet cause. Their brotherhood becomes the basis for sharing a political burden that neither claims to be able to carry by himself.
Secrecy, Messages, and Coordination
The alliance operates through guarded communication. Montague and Margaret arrange to speak privately; he listens at the door, goes down to the stable yard, and returns with Geoffrey before Margaret locks the room behind them. Geoffrey kneels before his mother, visibly excited, and produces a letter from Katherine for Princess Mary. His arrival makes the family plan tangible: the brothers’ political work is carried not only through declarations of loyalty but through a message entrusted to Geoffrey for delivery.
Geoffrey’s role extends beyond carrying that letter. He tells Margaret that Reginald is well connected and influential, moving between Rome, Paris, and Padua and listened to by the Pope. When asked what Reginald advises, Geoffrey conveys the emperor’s conditional promise to intervene and Montague confirms that war appears likely. Montague, for his part, reports having spoken with Arthur Plantagenet and describes other lords seeking his advice or speaking with the Spanish ambassador. The brothers are trying to connect private family allegiance to a broader political network, though the evidence shows plans and contacts rather than a completed uprising.
They agree that, for the present, they must wait. Geoffrey expects Reginald to send a signal early enough for supporters to arm their tenants. Montague insists that the matter remain within the family and among people already sworn to the queen or princess. The restriction reveals how closely their cooperation depends on secrecy: the network they hope will protect the royal family could also be interpreted as a conspiracy if exposed. Their confidence in kinship therefore exists alongside a clear awareness of the danger attached to acting together.
Shared Loyalty and Unequal Temperaments
The brothers’ alliance is marked by a difference in temperament rather than a difference in purpose. Montague speaks as the planner: he identifies the political crisis, proposes the journey to Calais, sets conditions for secrecy, and warns Geoffrey against treating the undertaking as a game. Geoffrey, by contrast, is eager for the scale and stakes of the enterprise. He insists that Montague cannot act alone and later reports the proposed imperial intervention with enthusiasm. The contrast gives their cooperation its shape: Montague’s caution organizes the effort, while Geoffrey’s ardor helps sustain it.
Margaret’s response underscores what their partnership asks of the family. She initially fears the consequences, but recognizes that she can no longer remain outside decisions about the princess in her care or her loyalty to Katherine. Her recollection that she taught Henry VIII to walk and loved his mother complicates a simple division between family loyalty and opposition to the king. She believes the brothers are right to defend the princess, yet also hopes Henry can be brought back from what she considers destructive counsel. The alliance is thus presented not as a rejection of kinship with the king, but as an attempt to act on competing obligations within the same extended family.
The brothers’ relationship ultimately supplies the human structure for the political argument: Montague and Geoffrey treat shared descent as a duty to act together, while the surrounding crisis turns that solidarity into a source of both influence and risk. The account establishes their plan, their division of roles, and their decision to wait for a signal; it does not, in these scenes, establish that their contemplated rising takes place or what becomes of the alliance afterward.