The Aftermath of the Verdict
The Last DuelThe duel produces money, status, legal consequences, and enduring arguments, while its apparent finality gives way to disputes over property and memory.
increasing
Bearing strength in each event
decreasing
Royal Rewards

Royal Rewards
Recognition from Charles
After the duel, Charles VI grants Jean money, a lifelong pension, and a place in his chamber. The victor receives advancement that had eluded him at Count Pierre’s court.
Victory becomes patronage
The king’s gifts transform a private conflict into a new relationship with royal power. Jean’s success now depends on a different center of influence.
Compensation from the Estate

Compensation from the Estate
A further award
The Parlement grants Jean 6,000 livres for expenses and injuries, charging the amount against Le Gris’s estate. The judgment adds substantial wealth to the spoils of combat.
A conflict persists
The payment does not extinguish disputes over Le Gris’s lands. The dead squire’s property continues to shape the victor’s legal and financial future.
The Land Remains Out of Reach

The Land Remains Out of Reach
A renewed claim
Jean seeks Aunou-le-Faucon again, treating possession of the estate as a possible completion of his revenge. The litigation lasts nearly two years.
The count keeps his rights
The Parlement rules for Count Pierre. Jean’s new royal status cannot override the established legal claim to the fief.
A Place at Court

A Place at Court
A higher rank
Jean becomes one of Charles VI’s chevaliers d’honneur and receives an additional royal payment. His career moves beyond the local court where he had repeatedly lost influence.
An old rival’s place
The new position resembles the royal access Le Gris once enjoyed. Jean’s ascent gives his victory a long political afterlife.
A Memory Still Disputed

A Memory Still Disputed
Stories diverge
Chronicles disagree about whether Le Gris was guilty and whether another man later confessed. The parties’ reputations remain contested after their deaths.
An unfinished historical case
The records establish the legal process and the fatal outcome but cannot answer every factual question. The case’s legacy is the tension between a verdict and uncertainty.
29 December 1386
9 February 1387
1387–January 1389
November 1390
After 1396