Readify

Night at Hävasshütte: Tony Leike and Adele Vetlesen's Rendezvous

The Leopard (Jo Nesbø Edition)

Night at Hävasshütte: Tony Leike and Adele Vetlesen's Rendezvous is the encounter that binds several strands of the murder investigation and overturns its apparent explanation. Seen from outside as a possible rape, it is reconstructed by Harry Hole as consensual sex; the distinction changes the meaning of the evidence and exposes the private humiliation that helps set the later violence in motion.

The Journey to Hävasshütte

On November 7, Adele Vetlesen and Borgny Stem-Myhre had both booked train tickets to Ustaoset, though from different starting points: Adele from Drammen and Borgny from Kongsberg. Ustaoset was not a town so much as a mountain region, and the journey continued through a chain of hiking cabins. Records tied to Iska Peller's account showed charges for two beds at four cabins, roughly a day's walk apart; Hävasshütte, the last stop in the route, lay about half a day's walk from Ustaoset. The records give the night a specific geography: a remote mountain refuge reached along a shared route, rather than an encounter in an ordinary urban setting.

At Hävasshütte, Adele and her traveling companion were among a group that included Marit Olsen, Elias Skog, Borgny Stem-Myhre, Charlotte Lolles, and Iska Peller. Iska was feverish and asleep alone in a separate room. After dinner, the fireplace was lit and wine was opened; some of the guests went to bed. Adele's companion was already in his room, waiting for her, while she stayed up. Tony arrived later. His arrival matters because it changed the night for the person who recognized his voice: to Adele's companion, the familiar sound carried the force of an earlier injury returning.

What Elias Saw

Elias Skog was woken by noises outside his bedroom window. In the moonlight, he saw a woman beneath the overhang of the outhouse and a man standing behind her, his face hidden from view. The woman faced Elias and seemed, to him, to be dancing; the man held a hand over her mouth. When he pulled her into the outhouse, Elias assumed they were preparing to have sex and that the hand was meant to keep them from waking the other guests. Disappointed that the view had been cut short, he went back to sleep.

The next morning Tony was gone. Elias did not initially treat what he had seen as an emergency or report that he believed a crime had occurred. Only after reading about the murders in the newspaper did he revisit the scene and wonder whether the woman had been struggling to escape, and whether the hand over her mouth had been meant to silence a call for help. By then, the image had changed in his memory: the apparent dance could be read as resistance, and the same gesture could appear coercive rather than intimate. His account therefore preserves both the observation and the uncertainty created by seeing it from a darkened room at a distance.

A Crime Scene Reinterpreted

The investigation seemed at first to support Elias's later suspicion. Tony Leike's DNA profile was matched through hairs from his hairbrush, and the reported encounter was treated as a rape. Harry Hole initially found that conclusion plausible, given the account of a man holding Adele's mouth and pulling her into the outhouse. But the evidence did not settle the question simply by identifying Tony; it had to be interpreted alongside the circumstances of the night.

Harry's reconstruction was that Tony and Adele had wanted one another. Tony arrived late, while Adele's companion had gone to bed angry. With the other guests nearby, Adele and Tony went outside to be alone. They kissed and touched one another, and Tony stood behind her. Harry inferred that fluid from Tony's arousal had reached Adele's ski pants before they had sex. Their cries woke Elias, who saw the scene but could not hear or know what had passed between them. Tony covered Adele's mouth to muffle the sounds, not because she was pleading for help. The gesture that had looked like proof of assault was also the detail most vulnerable to misreading when stripped of what the couple themselves were doing.

Adele's previous behavior helped Harry explain why she did not seem concerned that her companion might see or hear her. Her friends had described her as someone who changed partners spontaneously; on one occasion, she had sent a message to a boyfriend while another man was having sex with her. Harry also noted that she did not see the man from Hävasshütte again after the trip. Those details informed his reading of her choices without turning Elias's limited view into certainty: his window offered a glimpse, while the later reconstruction assembled motive and context from evidence and testimony.

The Encounter's Consequences

The cabin night gathered together people whose paths would matter to the case: Adele, reported missing by her partner in November; Borgny, who disappeared after leaving the Mono; and Marit, Charlotte, and Elias, whose names also became connected to murders. Elias's observation offered the investigators a possible account of what had happened to Adele, but it also threatened to fasten the wrong explanation onto Tony. The DNA link placed him at the center of the encounter; it did not, by itself, distinguish rape from consensual sex.

For Adele's companion, the sight of Tony with her was not an isolated episode. Harry's later account describes him listening to Tony speak with Marit and then Adele, hearing the voices grow quieter, and watching the couple outside. He recognized Tony and experienced the scene as a repetition of an earlier humiliation, with other people again positioned as witnesses. In Harry's reconstruction, that repetition helped turn shame into a plan for revenge, directed at those present and especially at Tony. The rendezvous thus occupies two sharply opposed positions in the story: for Adele and Tony, an encounter they chose; for Elias, an apparent assault; and for the watcher who recognized Tony, a renewed injury. Its significance rests on how one night could be intimate in fact, incriminating in appearance, and catastrophic in the meaning someone else gave it.