The Tahir Tan confrontation at the Huzur restaurant
The Museum of InnocenceBackground and Journey to Tarabya
The confrontation grew out of a social evening that Kemal had helped shape. As he and Füsun were leaving the Pelür Bar with Feridun, a friend of Feridun’s asked to come along. Kemal brusquely said there was no room in the car because they would be collecting Füsun’s parents for dinner. After reaching Çukurcuma, he persuaded her parents to join them, with some help from Füsun, and the group set out for the Huzur Restaurant in Tarabya. Kemal’s account presents the original excuse as a small, deliberate exclusion; the person left behind was not simply absent from the dinner but soon appeared there anyway.
By the time they had been eating and drinking for a while, Füsun’s tense manner had made the evening uneasy. Kemal turned to look for tombala players or sellers of fresh walnuts and saw the man with dark green eyes sitting two tables away with a companion, watching their table as he drank. Feridun recognized him as Tahir Tan, a performer in Turkish photoromans and action films whom he disliked, rather than a friend. The sight of Tahir’s presence changed a family outing into a confrontation whose subject was Füsun’s future in film.
The Confrontation
Tahir approached the table and addressed Kemal before explaining that he wanted to speak with Füsun’s parents. He presented himself as a courteous young man seeking parental permission, then said that two prominent producers, Muzaffer Bey and Hayal Hayati, had offered Füsun important roles. According to him, they understood that her parents would refuse because the films included kissing scenes. Feridun denied that account coldly, while Tarık Bey either did not hear Tahir or behaved as though he had not. The restaurant was noisy, and the exchange unfolded amid the ordinary activity of the dinner rather than in a private conversation.
Tahir’s manner grew rougher as he pressed the issue. He challenged Füsun to say whether she wanted a role, but she looked away and continued smoking calmly. Kemal stood, as did Feridun, and they placed themselves between Tahir and the table. Around them, other diners began turning to watch; Tahir’s companion also rose. An experienced waiter intervened, urging the men to step back and warning that drink and tempers could lead to trouble. No fight followed: Tahir’s companion took him away, and Feridun guided Kemal back to his seat. Kemal later expressed gratitude for Feridun’s gesture, which ended the standoff without further escalation.
The encounter therefore disclosed a conflict without resolving its underlying question. Tahir had made the offers and parental objections explicit, but Füsun did not answer his challenge in front of the table. Her silence cannot by itself establish what she wanted; later, however, she admitted to Kemal that she had at least encouraged the interest. Kemal interpreted this as a betrayal. His retrospective account makes the confrontation both a dispute over Füsun’s access to work and a moment when his own assumptions about her choices were unsettled.
Aftermath and Restrictions
Although the party eventually resumed the evening, the incident had consequences beyond the restaurant. Tarık Bey joined a song drifting from the neighboring gazino, and the group sang together on the drive home; for a time, the unpleasant scene seemed to recede. Kemal, however, did not forget it. He understood that Tahir had become interested in Füsun at the Pelür and had helped secure the offers, or that the producers had approached her after noticing Tahir’s interest. Füsun’s admission that she had encouraged them made the question of her acting ambitions harder for Kemal to dismiss as merely Tahir’s intrusion.
After the dinner, Füsun was barred from the film world’s gathering places in Beyoğlu, especially the Pelür. Her parents had been frightened by the confrontation, and the restrictions extended for a time to her neighborhood friends: she could not go out without asking her mother’s permission, as though she were still unmarried. Feridun tried to ease her anger by promising that he too would stay away from the Pelür. The measures were described as short-lived, but they sharply limited Füsun’s independence at a point when film work mattered to her.
The family’s response also exposed how an evening framed as protection could function as control. Tahir had publicly challenged the parents’ authority; their response was not to support Füsun’s participation but to narrow her opportunities and movements. The resulting conflict involved more than whether a particular film included kissing scenes: it placed Füsun’s desire to pursue acting within a household where her parents and husband could regulate her social access, while she herself had little room to state her position openly.
Film Work and Narrative Significance
Kemal came to regard getting an art film underway as the only hope of restoring Füsun’s spirits. That hope was uncertain: the project was not ready to pass the censors, and Kemal doubted that Feridun could repair it soon. Füsun was painfully aware of the film’s weakness and had begun painting a seagull in the back room. Her changing moods shaped Kemal’s visits; he sometimes found her listless and angry, and tried to read what she thought through her looks rather than ask directly. The restaurant episode thus carried into the repeated domestic visits, where her thwarted prospects and his effort to interpret her remained present without being openly settled.
The later production of Broken Lives connects the dispute to the couple’s continuing investment in cinema. In May 1981, Feridun began filming his screenplay, which used the title of Halit Ziya’s novel but moved its story into the streets and gazinos of 1970s Istanbul. Füsun did not play its heroine: Papatya took the role. The film became a box-office hit despite hostile critical reviews, and its success revived cinema audiences and activity at the Pelür. This later outcome gives the earlier argument an irony: the film business that had prompted restrictions on Füsun became central to the family’s hopes, even though the evidence does not show that the success restored her own opportunity to act.
The episode also belongs to Kemal’s larger account of film melodrama and sexual honor. Earlier, an open-air screening had made him conscious of how stories about women’s honor, marriage, and shame could draw a crowd into silence and emotion. At the Huzur Restaurant, those questions shifted from the screen to a family table, where a real acting offer became a matter of parental permission and social respectability. The public audience around the table, the men preparing to fight, and the waiter’s intervention made the dinner briefly resemble a performance; but Füsun’s future, rather than a fictional heroine’s, was at stake. Kemal narrates the event as a turning point partly because it revealed how little of her choice he could know or control.