Loughborough
The Pale Blue EyeLoughborough is a West Point cadet whose testimony gives Augustus Landor an intimate but incomplete account of Leroy Fry’s growing estrangement before Fry’s death. Once Fry’s roommate and, in Loughborough’s words, a friend of sorts, he can describe changed habits and a warning about a “bad bunch,” but cannot identify the people or events behind them. His evidence makes him a useful witness precisely because it shows both what a close companion observed and what Fry chose not to disclose.
Identity and Introduction
Edgar Allan Poe directs Landor’s attention to Loughborough after noticing that his steps were amiss at evening parade. The observation prompts Landor to request a conversation, which takes some arranging: Loughborough is called away from a section in natural and experimental philosophy, where he has been standing at the blackboard. When he enters, he finds Landor and Ethan Allen Hitchcock waiting to speak with him about Fry.
Landor describes Loughborough as short-limbed, with rounded cheeks and shiny, obsidian-like eyes. His manner in the interview supplies another contrast: once a question gives him a subject, he can talk at length. His account of a letter from his sister—announcing her marriage and setting out the timing and route of his reply—unfolds in such detail that Landor interrupts him to return to the investigation. The digression gives concrete form to Poe’s earlier description of a cadet who talks more than people listen to; it also establishes that Loughborough is not initially a concise or effortless witness.
Fry’s Roommate and the Investigation
Loughborough tells Landor that he and Fry were roommates in former days, until a falling out whose nature remains uncertain. Poe knows of the estrangement, but Loughborough’s account does not explain its cause. The friendship was not entirely severed: he describes them as “best pals of a sort,” and recalls trying to discover whether he had offended Fry when the other cadet became difficult to talk to.
Asked what happened on the evening when Fry went out, Loughborough says, “Leroy ran it.” He cannot say where Fry went. Fry had only told him to cover for him as best he could. The statement establishes that Loughborough was asked to conceal Fry’s absence, but it does not establish the destination, the purpose of the outing, or what Loughborough knew at the time. His testimony therefore adds a specific piece to the account of Fry’s movements without resolving the mystery around them.
Withdrawal and the “Bad Bunch”
Loughborough dates a revealing conversation to sometime in July. By then, Fry had become unwilling to speak, even to a former roommate who tried to ask whether something was wrong between them. He eventually told Loughborough that he had “fallen in with a bad bunch.” The phrase gives Landor and Hitchcock a troubling lead, but Fry did not name anyone, and Loughborough cannot say who the group was or what Fry meant by it.
The change in Fry’s conduct extended beyond conversation. According to Loughborough, Fry no longer wanted to loiter in their room or go swimming; he also stayed away from the cadet hops. He then joined the Prayer Squad. These details make the withdrawal visible as a series of departures from shared routines and social life, followed by a turn toward a religious group. Loughborough reports the sequence, not a proven explanation for it: the evidence does not show that the Prayer Squad was the “bad bunch,” or clarify how Fry’s warning related to his later membership.
Relationships and Narrative Significance
Loughborough’s account is valuable because it comes from a person close enough to notice Fry’s habits, yet it is bounded by the friendship’s breakdown. He can recall that Fry avoided him, that Fry denied the problem was personal, and that he eventually offered a vague explanation. He cannot supply the missing names or motive. The former roommate thus becomes a measure of the distance between observation and knowledge: even a companion who tried to draw Fry out was left with an unexplained warning and a request to cover an absence.
The testimony also complicates the picture of Fry circulating among his fellow cadets. Later, at a gathering, Randolph Ballinger invokes his sister while taunting Artemus Marquis about whether she had dazzled Fry. That exchange concerns the rumors and tensions surrounding Fry, but does not answer Loughborough’s unanswered question about the “bad bunch” or explain the former roommates’ falling out. Loughborough’s part in the narrative remains narrower and more consequential: he supplies a timeline of Fry’s increasing isolation, while the central causes stay beyond his knowledge.