Jagna’s settlement document
The PeasantsJagna’s settlement document is the paper record of Maciej Boryna’s promise of six morgen of land to Jagusia, but its authority proves sharply contested. It is presented first as a signed, witnessed claim to property and later dismissed by Antek as ineffective because it was not signed over at a notary. Its changing hands, and Jagusia’s decision to throw it away, make the document a physical focus for a dispute over what was promised, what can be claimed, and what can be enforced.
The land claim and its witnesses
In a discussion about Jagusia’s claim, Dominikowa stresses that the matter concerns six morgen written over to her by the deceased Maciej Boryna, not merely words. Hanka answers that they have the settlement, officially signed and witnessed. The exchange establishes the paper’s practical importance: it is offered as evidence that Jagusia’s land claim rests on a specific act and a document, rather than on an informal recollection alone.
The surrounding conversation connects the land to other property Jagusia could take immediately. She is said to have a cow with a calf, a pig, and geese. These goods are distinct from the six morgen, but the discussion places both land and household property within the same contest over what belongs to her and what she may take. The document therefore represents a substantial claim, not an abstract token.
Jagusia rejects the paper
When her mother moves to remonstrate and explain, Jagusia dismisses her and takes a piece of paper from the bottom of a chest. She identifies it as the settlement for the morgen, then throws it in Hanka’s face and tells her, contemptuously, to take it and gorge herself on it. Instead of protecting her claim by holding on to the paper, Jagusia repudiates it in the heat of the confrontation.
She then hurriedly ties up her bundles and carries them out into the yard. Hanka is so astonished that she struggles to take in what has happened: Jagusia has cast aside all six morgen as if they were worthless. Hanka picks up the document, while Jagusia turns to taking down the pictures. The paper has not vanished or been destroyed; it has passed from Jagusia’s possession into Hanka’s hands, even as Jagusia’s conduct makes clear that she does not want to assert the claim in that moment.
Antek questions its legal force
Later, Hanka recounts the circumstances to Antek, though the narration notes that she omits much. She gives him the settlement. Antek recognizes it as the very document Maciej Boryna had given Jagusia, but responds with a bitter laugh and calls it as useful as a broken stick. In his view, the writing would mean something if Jagusia had signed it over at the notary; throwing it down, he says, was a joke.
The exchange exposes a difference between two kinds of authority. Hanka has emphasized signatures and witnesses as proof, while Antek insists that notarization is necessary for the document to have legal effect. The evidence does not show a court ruling on the settlement, so his judgment should not be mistaken for a final adjudication. It does show that the paper’s status is disputed even among those discussing its value: it can substantiate what Maciej Boryna gave, yet still fail, in Antek’s assessment, to secure an enforceable transfer.
A document caught between property and choice
The settlement’s course gives the object a double significance. It carries a precise promise of land, but its presence does not settle who can claim that land or what legal form the claim requires. In one scene it is retrieved from the bottom of a chest and flung at Hanka; later Hanka presents it to Antek, who examines the same paper and finds it inadequate. Its material survival contrasts with the instability of the rights it is supposed to represent.
Jagusia’s rejection also complicates the document’s role. The land is valuable enough to be the subject of a pointed dispute, and Hanka is stunned that Jagusia would give up the claim. Yet Jagusia’s act makes the settlement more than evidence in a property argument: it becomes something she actively refuses to use as leverage. The document records a transfer, but the scenes surrounding it leave open whether that written promise can be translated into possession or whether Jagusia will choose to pursue it.


