Heinrich Himmler
The Plot Against AmericaHeinrich Himmler is the chief architect of Nazi pressure on the United States in the novel’s account of Lindbergh’s presidency. As head of the Schutzstaffel and the Gestapo, he seeks to bend American policy toward the persecution and eventual removal of the country’s Jews; when Charles A. Lindbergh resists, Himmler uses the president’s family as leverage and Berlin arranges his disappearance. The account gives Himmler power not merely as a distant Nazi official but as a strategist who probes the limits of American institutions and exploits the weaknesses of the man elected to lead them.
Position and Reach
Himmler is introduced as commander of the Schutzstaffel, which controlled the concentration camps, and chief of the Gestapo. He oversees racial-purification programs and stands second in power only to Adolf Hitler. The political narrative gives this institutional authority a direct foreign reach: Hitler, meeting weekly with Himmler and Hermann Göring, prepares a foreign policy for the United States that serves Germany’s wartime objectives and imperial ambitions.
Himmler’s involvement is not confined to diplomacy between governments. He presses Lindbergh to impose repressive measures on the four and a half million Jews in the United States, making American domestic policy a target of Nazi direction. His staff’s dismissive label for the president, an American Gauleiter, captures the contradiction at the heart of this project: Lindbergh holds office through American institutions, yet Himmler expects him to act as an instrument of German power.
Pressure on Lindbergh
Lindbergh initially responds to Himmler’s demands with measures he considers limited enough to leave Jews essentially unharmed while appearing to satisfy Berlin. The Office of American Absorption and its programs, including Just Folks and Homestead 42, serve as tokens of compliance in this account. Himmler sees through the maneuver. He does not mistake an outward appearance of cooperation for the systematic persecution he wants, and he presses for more forceful action.
To intensify that pressure, Himmler sends Joachim von Ribbentrop to Washington on the pretext of a ceremonial state visit. The visit is meant to help bring Lindbergh into line on anti-Jewish policy. Lindbergh invokes the United States Constitution and democratic traditions as barriers to carrying out a Final Solution in the United States with the speed and efficiency possible under Nazi rule in Europe. Himmler’s response is conveyed through a cable delivered to the president during the state dinner: it reminds him that his son, Charles Lindbergh Jr., is in German custody and implies that the boy’s safety depends on his father’s conduct. Political disagreement is thus converted into personal blackmail.
Lindbergh’s Failure and Berlin’s Response
Himmler reads Lindbergh’s resistance as evidence that the president will not fulfill the role Berlin had assigned him. The narrative contrasts the American leader’s constitutional objections with Himmler’s expectation of a committed persecutor, describing Lindbergh in the internal Nazi view as insufficiently reliable. Lindbergh’s earlier victory over Franklin D. Roosevelt and the anti-Nazi interventionists had already served German interests by buying Germany time against Soviet resistance and delaying a confrontation with American industrial and military power. But, in Himmler’s calculation, that usefulness does not make Lindbergh dependable as an agent of persecution.
Berlin consequently decides that Lindbergh’s plane must disappear. The account links that decision to the failure to secure the president’s cooperation and to Himmler’s preference for a government that will carry out the measures he demands. After Lindbergh vanishes, Acting President Burton K. Wheeler assumes power and rapidly implements measures that von Ribbentrop had proposed to Lindbergh. The succession makes Himmler’s pressure consequential beyond the White House: the central question is no longer whether the president will comply, but who will exercise power in his place and how far that government will go.
Himmler’s leverage over Lindbergh’s son also extends to Anne Morrow Lindbergh. Within an hour of the disappearance, the German embassy tells her that responsibility for Charles Jr.’s well-being rests with her alone and threatens to send the boy from his military academy to the Russian front if she does not leave the White House and withdraw from public life. Her subsequent radio address challenges Wheeler’s seizure of power, but the account leaves the child’s actual fate unsettled. Himmler’s threat therefore shapes the crisis without resolving the mystery at its center.
Narrative Account and Historical End
The story of Himmler’s intervention reaches Philip Roth through Aunt Evelyn’s explanation to his mother after Lionel Bengelsdorf is arrested. Bengelsdorf later presents a fuller version in My Life Under Lindbergh, a postwar book described as an insider’s diary. A Lindbergh family spokesman rejects it as a false account, and Philip’s mother initially interprets her sister’s story as evidence that the shock of the arrest has unsettled her. The frame leaves the allegations contested within the fictional history: Himmler’s alleged role is narrated in detail, but the source of that account is itself disputed. That uncertainty makes the political revelation inseparable from the question of who can be believed after the crisis.
The reference account records that Himmler dies in May 1945 after British troops capture him; he poisons himself in custody. This brief historical endpoint stands apart from the extended account of his imagined American influence, but it fixes the fate of a figure otherwise presented through orders, pressure, and the political consequences of his plans. His role in the novel is defined by that reach: the Atlantic does not keep Nazi power at a distance when American leaders and institutions can be made to carry its demands.