Readify

U.S. War on Drugs

The Power of the Dog

The U.S. War on Drugs is a campaign against narcotics that the novel presents as both a genuine law-enforcement mission and a flexible language of national security. It sends troops into Mexico to destroy opium production, but also supplies political cover for military assistance aimed at left-wing insurgencies. Meanwhile, the Mexican drug trade grows entangled with the state itself: the same political order ostensibly fighting traffickers can be financed, manipulated, and constrained by them.

A military front in Mexico

The campaign opens in the mountains near Badiraguato, where ten thousand Mexican Army troops move through a valley alongside the Municipal Judicial Federal Police and a dozen Drug Enforcement Administration advisers, including Art Keller. Soldiers advance on foot and horseback, while their orders are to poison poppy fields, burn what remains, and scatter the people who grow the crop. The target is the source of Mexican heroin, a cheap and potent product reaching American cities. The campaign’s scale makes the valley feel like a theater of war: a military sweep, supported by aircraft, bombing, and defoliants, is being directed against agricultural production and the communities around it.

Art is not indifferent to the stated purpose. Growing up in Barrio Logan in San Diego, he witnessed heroin’s damage to a poor neighborhood and believes in getting drugs off the streets. But his pursuit of Don Pedro Áviles is not free of personal ambition. Capturing the trafficker would make Art a professional success, and Art recognizes that this career motive complicates the righteous purpose he gives the mission. The tension becomes institutional as well as personal: after large areas of poppy and the Sinaloan growers’ infrastructure have been destroyed, the Drug Enforcement Administration continues to demand Don Pedro’s capture as the operation’s defining achievement. The campaign risks making a single arrest into a trophy, as if the destruction already accomplished cannot count without a famous man to symbolize it.

Its costs are not abstract. Art encounters nineteen dead people in the course of the wider war: ten men, three women, and six children. He has seen many bodies during his fourteen-year conflict with Adán Barrera, but the number and the presence of women, children, and babies break through his accustomed way of viewing casualties. The scene gives the campaign’s broad language of victory a human measure, without making its victims interchangeable with fields destroyed or targets pursued.

From anti-drug policy to counterinsurgency

The novel later shows how the drug war’s authority can be redirected toward an explicitly political purpose. John Hobbs describes Nicaragua as a strategic threat and invokes the danger of a Communist presence in Central America. He frames the conflict through the image of a Communist camel entering the tent, then argues that instability could spread from Nicaragua through neighboring countries and toward Mexico. His case treats geography as an urgent security problem and presents intervention as a choice forced by the risk of a wider conflict.

Art objects to the proposed allies, pointing to Contras involved in drug pushing and to Salvadoran death squads that kill civilians, priests, and nuns. Hobbs answers that the covert operation, Cerberus, comes from the highest authority in the country. In this account, the drug war is not simply the subject of the operation; it is also a route through which support for anti-Communist forces can be made politically possible. Hobbs’s argument exposes the moral trade at the heart of the security rhetoric: military and covert action are justified as necessities, while the conduct of the forces used to pursue them becomes something the argument asks its audience to accept.

The same logic returns when the Mexican government faces left-wing insurgencies. Hobbs sees the Zapatistas in Chiapas gaining strength and the Popular Revolutionary Army emerging after attacks that kill sixteen police officers and wound twenty-three. He also connects unrest to the economic damage of the peso crisis and the disruptions associated with the North American Free Trade Agreement. His assessment includes secret U.S. contingency plans for a possible invasion of Mexico if social and economic breakdown becomes total, but he recognizes that neither the Mexican government nor the United States Congress can openly accept military assistance framed as intervention against insurgents. Aid can instead be presented as a contribution to the War on Drugs.

Under that cover, Congress funds seventy-five Huey helicopters and twelve C-26 aircraft for the stated purpose of combating traffickers; Hobbs expects the equipment to be transferred quietly to the Mexican Army for use against insurgents in Chiapas and Guerrero. When Art challenges Hobbs over allowing weapons to reach Communist insurgents in Colombia and over increasing Chinese influence in Panama, Hobbs replies that Art himself will let the shipment proceed. The exchange makes the campaign’s double use concrete: a familiar anti-drug rationale can unlock resources for a covert political strategy, while responsibility for the resulting decision is shifted onto the person being pressured to carry it out.

A campaign shaped by trafficking power

The drug war’s official opposition to traffickers exists alongside a Mexican political order that the novel depicts as vulnerable to their influence. In a conversation with García Abrego, Adán Barrera defines Guadalajara as a safe place from which to serve the Federation. He offers to share his protection and contacts, explaining that the arrangement carries a fee. The exchange presents protection not merely as a personal favor but as a resource that can be organized and sold across the Federation’s network.

That reach becomes unmistakably political in the account of the 1988 election. The Federation helped the governing Institutional Revolutionary Party preserve its position after computers counting the votes malfunctioned, when the opposition candidate Cárdenas had appeared likely to win. The episode links organized crime to the mechanisms of political succession, rather than treating corruption as an isolated bribe to an individual official. Later, the Federation uses its financial power on a national scale. After the new president takes office on December 1, 1994, two Federation-controlled brokerage houses begin buying government bonds; the cartels then withdraw funds from the national bank, helping force a 50 percent devaluation of the peso. The Federation cashes in its bonds and buys property, businesses, land, and pesos at reduced values.

The president subsequently invites the narco lords to return their money to the country to support its economy. Adán accepts, but demands a favorable trade environment: the government may speak about breaking the cartels, but must not act against them. The contrast is central to the novel’s treatment of the War on Drugs. Public declarations of enforcement coexist with a private bargain that limits enforcement, while criminal wealth becomes a lever over both national policy and the economy.

The wider architecture of the war

The drug-war framework is also connected to Red Mist, a coordinated set of operations intended to neutralize left-wing movements across Latin America. Sal Scachi’s role is to share intelligence, distribute assets, coordinate targets, and prevent participating agencies from interfering with one another. The network spans hundreds of right-wing militias and their drug-lord sponsors, military officers and troops, intelligence agencies, and police forces. Its scale shows the reach of a system in which anti-Communist coordination and drug trafficking are not cleanly separated from one another.

Taken together, these episodes make the U.S. War on Drugs more than a contest between law enforcement and traffickers. In Mexico it destroys crops and pursues a high-profile target; in the United States it supplies a politically acceptable rationale for aid with other uses; and within Mexico, the Federation turns money and protection into influence over elections, policy, and economic life. The campaign’s declared objective remains intelligible, especially through Art’s experience of heroin’s harm, but the novel repeatedly sets that objective against the uses to which governments and criminal organizations put the war.