Fujiya Hotel shooting
Tokyo ViceThe Fujiya Hotel shooting was the killing of Eiju Kim outside the Fujiya Hotel by Naoto Kametani, a fellow member of the Yamaguchi-gumi. The attack was striking not only for its suddenness but because the two men were close friends and led factions within the same larger organization; the account describes violence between those factions as rare.
Participants and Background
Eiju Kim, whose actual age was unknown but was estimated to be in his late forties, was a Japanese citizen of Korean ancestry and head of the Osaka yakuza group Kyoyou-kai. Kyoyou-kai belonged to the Yamaguchi-gumi. Naoto Kametani, who headed the Rokkorengo gang, was also part of the Yamaguchi-gumi. Despite their positions at the heads of separate groups, Kim and Kametani were close friends.
Kim was accompanied by Kenichi Takanuki, his thirty-year-old underling and driver. The scene therefore brought together two group leaders with a personal bond, as well as the subordinate responsible for driving Kim. Their shared organizational affiliation did not prevent the confrontation from ending in lethal violence.
The Shooting
Kim and Kametani had a heated conversation in front of the Fujiya Hotel. Kim then broke off the exchange and briskly climbed into the back seat of a large black car parked nearby. Takanuki took the driver’s seat, while Kametani remained standing beside the vehicle.
As the car pulled into traffic, Kametani drew a handgun and fired into the back seat, killing Kim instantly. Takanuki got out of the car and was shot as well; the account does not state that he died. Kametani fled on foot, but went only about two hundred feet before police officers who happened to be nearby tackled and arrested him for attempted murder.
Arrest and Significance
The immediate arrest made the incident appear, on the surface, to be a straightforward homicide. Yet the attack was described as highly unusual because violence between factions of the same organization was rare. The contrast between the men’s close friendship and the abrupt shooting gives the event its central tension, while the account supplies no motive for Kametani’s attack.
The narrator later confirms having been at the scene and having seen Kim’s body. That witness detail anchors the account in direct observation, but does not resolve why the conversation turned deadly. The event consequently presents a clear sequence of actions and an arrest, while leaving the underlying cause unexplained.